Cargando…

In office management of optic capture of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses

INTRODUCTION: Optic capture of sutured scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PC IOLs) is an occasional complication resulting in blurred vision and discomfort. METHODS: A retrospective study of the management of 18 eyes (3.6%) with optic capture out of 495 eyes with scleral fixated I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kokame, Gregg T., Card, Kevin, Pisig, Alex U., Shantha, Jessica G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35146208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101356
_version_ 1784646047004360704
author Kokame, Gregg T.
Card, Kevin
Pisig, Alex U.
Shantha, Jessica G.
author_facet Kokame, Gregg T.
Card, Kevin
Pisig, Alex U.
Shantha, Jessica G.
author_sort Kokame, Gregg T.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Optic capture of sutured scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PC IOLs) is an occasional complication resulting in blurred vision and discomfort. METHODS: A retrospective study of the management of 18 eyes (3.6%) with optic capture out of 495 eyes with scleral fixated IOLs during the study period. 54 procedures were performed in the management of optic capture of sutured scleral fixated PC IOLs. An in-office technique was utilized to relieve the optic capture by repositioning the optic posterior to the iris. This technique was performed after topical anesthesia and topical 5% betadine with the patient stably positioned at the slit lamp. Using a 30-gauge needle, sometimes after a 15-degree paracentesis blade, the needle was advanced in a parallel plane above the iris until the tip reached the edge of the captured optic. The optic is engaged in the inferior periphery away from the central visual axis, and pushed gently posteriorly just enough to reposition the optic posterior to the iris. In some cases, pilocarpine 2% drops were utilized after the procedure to decrease the risk of recapture of the optic. RESULTS: All 54 procedures were successfully performed in the office without significant pain or discomfort. Vision before optic capture, during optic capture, and at the first office visit after optic capture were comparable. There were not any cases of endophthalmitis, hyphema, iris trauma, iris prolapse or keratitis. While eight patients only had one episode of optic capture, 10 patients had multiple episodes of optic capture, all managed with this in office procedure. Recurrent optic capture occurred more frequently in eyes with fixation at less than 2 mm from the limbus than eyes with scleral fixation at 2 mm from the limbus. CONCLUSION: Reposition of the optic after pupillary capture of a scleral fixated PC IOL can be successfully performed in the office without discomfort or significant complications and is an alternative management option to a return to the operating room. This procedure may be especially important when there is poor access to the operating room or restricted access to the operating room as during the COVID19 pandemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8819374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88193742022-02-09 In office management of optic capture of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses Kokame, Gregg T. Card, Kevin Pisig, Alex U. Shantha, Jessica G. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep Case Report INTRODUCTION: Optic capture of sutured scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PC IOLs) is an occasional complication resulting in blurred vision and discomfort. METHODS: A retrospective study of the management of 18 eyes (3.6%) with optic capture out of 495 eyes with scleral fixated IOLs during the study period. 54 procedures were performed in the management of optic capture of sutured scleral fixated PC IOLs. An in-office technique was utilized to relieve the optic capture by repositioning the optic posterior to the iris. This technique was performed after topical anesthesia and topical 5% betadine with the patient stably positioned at the slit lamp. Using a 30-gauge needle, sometimes after a 15-degree paracentesis blade, the needle was advanced in a parallel plane above the iris until the tip reached the edge of the captured optic. The optic is engaged in the inferior periphery away from the central visual axis, and pushed gently posteriorly just enough to reposition the optic posterior to the iris. In some cases, pilocarpine 2% drops were utilized after the procedure to decrease the risk of recapture of the optic. RESULTS: All 54 procedures were successfully performed in the office without significant pain or discomfort. Vision before optic capture, during optic capture, and at the first office visit after optic capture were comparable. There were not any cases of endophthalmitis, hyphema, iris trauma, iris prolapse or keratitis. While eight patients only had one episode of optic capture, 10 patients had multiple episodes of optic capture, all managed with this in office procedure. Recurrent optic capture occurred more frequently in eyes with fixation at less than 2 mm from the limbus than eyes with scleral fixation at 2 mm from the limbus. CONCLUSION: Reposition of the optic after pupillary capture of a scleral fixated PC IOL can be successfully performed in the office without discomfort or significant complications and is an alternative management option to a return to the operating room. This procedure may be especially important when there is poor access to the operating room or restricted access to the operating room as during the COVID19 pandemic. Elsevier 2022-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8819374/ /pubmed/35146208 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101356 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Kokame, Gregg T.
Card, Kevin
Pisig, Alex U.
Shantha, Jessica G.
In office management of optic capture of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses
title In office management of optic capture of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses
title_full In office management of optic capture of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses
title_fullStr In office management of optic capture of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses
title_full_unstemmed In office management of optic capture of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses
title_short In office management of optic capture of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses
title_sort in office management of optic capture of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35146208
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101356
work_keys_str_mv AT kokamegreggt inofficemanagementofopticcaptureofscleralfixatedposteriorchamberintraocularlenses
AT cardkevin inofficemanagementofopticcaptureofscleralfixatedposteriorchamberintraocularlenses
AT pisigalexu inofficemanagementofopticcaptureofscleralfixatedposteriorchamberintraocularlenses
AT shanthajessicag inofficemanagementofopticcaptureofscleralfixatedposteriorchamberintraocularlenses