Cargando…

Immediate smoking cessation support versus usual care in smokers attending a targeted lung health check: the QuLIT trial

OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer screening programmes offer an opportunity to address tobacco dependence in current smokers. The effectiveness of different approaches to smoking cessation in this context has not yet been established. We investigated if immediate smoking cessation support, including pharmacot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buttery, Sara C, Williams, Parris, Mweseli, Rebecca, Philip, Keir Elmslie James, Sadaka, Ahmed, Bartlett, Emily Catharine, Devaraj, Anand, Kemp, Samuel V, Addis, Jamie, Derbyshire, Jane, Chen, Michelle, Morris, Katie, Laverty, Anthony, Hopkinson, Nicholas S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35121633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001030
_version_ 1784646126658387968
author Buttery, Sara C
Williams, Parris
Mweseli, Rebecca
Philip, Keir Elmslie James
Sadaka, Ahmed
Bartlett, Emily Catharine
Devaraj, Anand
Kemp, Samuel V
Addis, Jamie
Derbyshire, Jane
Chen, Michelle
Morris, Katie
Laverty, Anthony
Hopkinson, Nicholas S
author_facet Buttery, Sara C
Williams, Parris
Mweseli, Rebecca
Philip, Keir Elmslie James
Sadaka, Ahmed
Bartlett, Emily Catharine
Devaraj, Anand
Kemp, Samuel V
Addis, Jamie
Derbyshire, Jane
Chen, Michelle
Morris, Katie
Laverty, Anthony
Hopkinson, Nicholas S
author_sort Buttery, Sara C
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer screening programmes offer an opportunity to address tobacco dependence in current smokers. The effectiveness of different approaches to smoking cessation in this context has not yet been established. We investigated if immediate smoking cessation support, including pharmacotherapy, offered as part of a lung cancer screening programme, increases quit rates compared to usual care (Very Brief Advice to quit and signposting to smoking cessation services). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-blind randomised controlled trial of current smokers aged 55–75 years attending a Targeted Lung Health Check. On randomly allocated days smokers received either (1) immediate support from a trained smoking cessation counsellor with appropriate pharmacotherapy or (2) usual care. The primary outcome was self-reported quit rate at 3 months. We performed thematic analysis of participant interview responses. RESULTS: Of 412 people attending between January and March 2020, 115 (27.9%) were current smokers; 46% female, mean (SD) 62.4 (5.3) years. Follow-up data were available for 84 smokers. At 3 months, quit rates in the intervention group were higher 14/48 (29.2%) vs 4/36 (11%) (χ(2) 3.98, p=0.04). Participant interviews revealed four smoking-cessation related themes: (1) stress and anxiety, (2) impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, (3) CT scans influencing desire to quit and (4) individual beliefs about stopping smoking. CONCLUSION: The provision of immediate smoking cessation support is associated with a substantial increase in quit rates at 3 months. Further research is needed to investigate longer-term outcomes and to refine future service delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12455871.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8819808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88198082022-02-08 Immediate smoking cessation support versus usual care in smokers attending a targeted lung health check: the QuLIT trial Buttery, Sara C Williams, Parris Mweseli, Rebecca Philip, Keir Elmslie James Sadaka, Ahmed Bartlett, Emily Catharine Devaraj, Anand Kemp, Samuel V Addis, Jamie Derbyshire, Jane Chen, Michelle Morris, Katie Laverty, Anthony Hopkinson, Nicholas S BMJ Open Respir Res Smoking OBJECTIVES: Lung cancer screening programmes offer an opportunity to address tobacco dependence in current smokers. The effectiveness of different approaches to smoking cessation in this context has not yet been established. We investigated if immediate smoking cessation support, including pharmacotherapy, offered as part of a lung cancer screening programme, increases quit rates compared to usual care (Very Brief Advice to quit and signposting to smoking cessation services). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-blind randomised controlled trial of current smokers aged 55–75 years attending a Targeted Lung Health Check. On randomly allocated days smokers received either (1) immediate support from a trained smoking cessation counsellor with appropriate pharmacotherapy or (2) usual care. The primary outcome was self-reported quit rate at 3 months. We performed thematic analysis of participant interview responses. RESULTS: Of 412 people attending between January and March 2020, 115 (27.9%) were current smokers; 46% female, mean (SD) 62.4 (5.3) years. Follow-up data were available for 84 smokers. At 3 months, quit rates in the intervention group were higher 14/48 (29.2%) vs 4/36 (11%) (χ(2) 3.98, p=0.04). Participant interviews revealed four smoking-cessation related themes: (1) stress and anxiety, (2) impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, (3) CT scans influencing desire to quit and (4) individual beliefs about stopping smoking. CONCLUSION: The provision of immediate smoking cessation support is associated with a substantial increase in quit rates at 3 months. Further research is needed to investigate longer-term outcomes and to refine future service delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN12455871. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8819808/ /pubmed/35121633 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001030 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Smoking
Buttery, Sara C
Williams, Parris
Mweseli, Rebecca
Philip, Keir Elmslie James
Sadaka, Ahmed
Bartlett, Emily Catharine
Devaraj, Anand
Kemp, Samuel V
Addis, Jamie
Derbyshire, Jane
Chen, Michelle
Morris, Katie
Laverty, Anthony
Hopkinson, Nicholas S
Immediate smoking cessation support versus usual care in smokers attending a targeted lung health check: the QuLIT trial
title Immediate smoking cessation support versus usual care in smokers attending a targeted lung health check: the QuLIT trial
title_full Immediate smoking cessation support versus usual care in smokers attending a targeted lung health check: the QuLIT trial
title_fullStr Immediate smoking cessation support versus usual care in smokers attending a targeted lung health check: the QuLIT trial
title_full_unstemmed Immediate smoking cessation support versus usual care in smokers attending a targeted lung health check: the QuLIT trial
title_short Immediate smoking cessation support versus usual care in smokers attending a targeted lung health check: the QuLIT trial
title_sort immediate smoking cessation support versus usual care in smokers attending a targeted lung health check: the qulit trial
topic Smoking
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35121633
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001030
work_keys_str_mv AT butterysarac immediatesmokingcessationsupportversususualcareinsmokersattendingatargetedlunghealthcheckthequlittrial
AT williamsparris immediatesmokingcessationsupportversususualcareinsmokersattendingatargetedlunghealthcheckthequlittrial
AT mweselirebecca immediatesmokingcessationsupportversususualcareinsmokersattendingatargetedlunghealthcheckthequlittrial
AT philipkeirelmsliejames immediatesmokingcessationsupportversususualcareinsmokersattendingatargetedlunghealthcheckthequlittrial
AT sadakaahmed immediatesmokingcessationsupportversususualcareinsmokersattendingatargetedlunghealthcheckthequlittrial
AT bartlettemilycatharine immediatesmokingcessationsupportversususualcareinsmokersattendingatargetedlunghealthcheckthequlittrial
AT devarajanand immediatesmokingcessationsupportversususualcareinsmokersattendingatargetedlunghealthcheckthequlittrial
AT kempsamuelv immediatesmokingcessationsupportversususualcareinsmokersattendingatargetedlunghealthcheckthequlittrial
AT addisjamie immediatesmokingcessationsupportversususualcareinsmokersattendingatargetedlunghealthcheckthequlittrial
AT derbyshirejane immediatesmokingcessationsupportversususualcareinsmokersattendingatargetedlunghealthcheckthequlittrial
AT chenmichelle immediatesmokingcessationsupportversususualcareinsmokersattendingatargetedlunghealthcheckthequlittrial
AT morriskatie immediatesmokingcessationsupportversususualcareinsmokersattendingatargetedlunghealthcheckthequlittrial
AT lavertyanthony immediatesmokingcessationsupportversususualcareinsmokersattendingatargetedlunghealthcheckthequlittrial
AT hopkinsonnicholass immediatesmokingcessationsupportversususualcareinsmokersattendingatargetedlunghealthcheckthequlittrial