Cargando…

Biomechanical evaluation of a novel decompression surgery: Transforaminal full-endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD)

BACKGROUND: Transforaminal full endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD) can decompress lateral recess stenosis transforaminally under the endoscopy procedure. However, the biomechanical effects of the TE-LRD compared to the conventional decompression techniques are not reported. The purpose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsumoto, Koji, Shah, Anoli, Kelkar, Amey, Parajuli, Dikshya, Sudershan, Sushil, Goel, Vijay K., Sairyo, Koichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2020.100045
_version_ 1784646151413170176
author Matsumoto, Koji
Shah, Anoli
Kelkar, Amey
Parajuli, Dikshya
Sudershan, Sushil
Goel, Vijay K.
Sairyo, Koichi
author_facet Matsumoto, Koji
Shah, Anoli
Kelkar, Amey
Parajuli, Dikshya
Sudershan, Sushil
Goel, Vijay K.
Sairyo, Koichi
author_sort Matsumoto, Koji
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transforaminal full endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD) can decompress lateral recess stenosis transforaminally under the endoscopy procedure. However, the biomechanical effects of the TE-LRD compared to the conventional decompression techniques are not reported. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical effects of TE-LRD with conventional decompression techniques using finite element method. METHODS: Three finite element models of lumbar functional spinal unit (FSU) of the L4-L5 levels were created: 1) normal disc 2) moderate grade disc degeneration 3) severe grade disc degeneration. For each of these three models, the following decompression techniques were simulated, 1) 50% TE-LRD, 2) 100% TE-LRD, 3) Unilateral laminectomy, 4) Bilateral laminectomy. The lower endplate of the fifth lumbar vertebra was fixed and 10Nm of moment in flexion/extension, left/right bending and axial rotation was applied to the upper endplate of the fourth lumbar vertebra, under a follower load of 400N. The range of motion, intervertebral disc stress, and facet joint stress were compared. RESULTS: 50% TE-LRD was found to be the most stable decompression technique in all intervertebral disc models. Though the increase in the range of motion of 100% TE-LRD was higher than other decompression techniques in the normal disc model, it was not significantly different from 50% TE-LRD or unilateral laminectomy techniques in the degenerated disc models. The increase in the intervertebral disc stress was lowest for the 50% TE-LRD surgery in all intervertebral disc models. The increase in the facet stresses for 50% TE-LRD was lower than in the conventional decompression techniques for all intervertebral disc models. CONCLUSIONS: 50% TE-LRD was the decompression surgical technique with the least effect on spinal instability. 100% TE-LRD showed to be effective for cases with degenerative discs. 50% TE-LRD may decrease the risk of postoperative intervertebral disc and facet joint degeneration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8819954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88199542022-02-08 Biomechanical evaluation of a novel decompression surgery: Transforaminal full-endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD) Matsumoto, Koji Shah, Anoli Kelkar, Amey Parajuli, Dikshya Sudershan, Sushil Goel, Vijay K. Sairyo, Koichi N Am Spine Soc J Basic Science BACKGROUND: Transforaminal full endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD) can decompress lateral recess stenosis transforaminally under the endoscopy procedure. However, the biomechanical effects of the TE-LRD compared to the conventional decompression techniques are not reported. The purpose of this study is to compare the biomechanical effects of TE-LRD with conventional decompression techniques using finite element method. METHODS: Three finite element models of lumbar functional spinal unit (FSU) of the L4-L5 levels were created: 1) normal disc 2) moderate grade disc degeneration 3) severe grade disc degeneration. For each of these three models, the following decompression techniques were simulated, 1) 50% TE-LRD, 2) 100% TE-LRD, 3) Unilateral laminectomy, 4) Bilateral laminectomy. The lower endplate of the fifth lumbar vertebra was fixed and 10Nm of moment in flexion/extension, left/right bending and axial rotation was applied to the upper endplate of the fourth lumbar vertebra, under a follower load of 400N. The range of motion, intervertebral disc stress, and facet joint stress were compared. RESULTS: 50% TE-LRD was found to be the most stable decompression technique in all intervertebral disc models. Though the increase in the range of motion of 100% TE-LRD was higher than other decompression techniques in the normal disc model, it was not significantly different from 50% TE-LRD or unilateral laminectomy techniques in the degenerated disc models. The increase in the intervertebral disc stress was lowest for the 50% TE-LRD surgery in all intervertebral disc models. The increase in the facet stresses for 50% TE-LRD was lower than in the conventional decompression techniques for all intervertebral disc models. CONCLUSIONS: 50% TE-LRD was the decompression surgical technique with the least effect on spinal instability. 100% TE-LRD showed to be effective for cases with degenerative discs. 50% TE-LRD may decrease the risk of postoperative intervertebral disc and facet joint degeneration. Elsevier 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC8819954/ /pubmed/35141612 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2020.100045 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of North American Spine Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Basic Science
Matsumoto, Koji
Shah, Anoli
Kelkar, Amey
Parajuli, Dikshya
Sudershan, Sushil
Goel, Vijay K.
Sairyo, Koichi
Biomechanical evaluation of a novel decompression surgery: Transforaminal full-endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD)
title Biomechanical evaluation of a novel decompression surgery: Transforaminal full-endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD)
title_full Biomechanical evaluation of a novel decompression surgery: Transforaminal full-endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD)
title_fullStr Biomechanical evaluation of a novel decompression surgery: Transforaminal full-endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD)
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical evaluation of a novel decompression surgery: Transforaminal full-endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD)
title_short Biomechanical evaluation of a novel decompression surgery: Transforaminal full-endoscopic lateral recess decompression (TE-LRD)
title_sort biomechanical evaluation of a novel decompression surgery: transforaminal full-endoscopic lateral recess decompression (te-lrd)
topic Basic Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141612
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2020.100045
work_keys_str_mv AT matsumotokoji biomechanicalevaluationofanoveldecompressionsurgerytransforaminalfullendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressiontelrd
AT shahanoli biomechanicalevaluationofanoveldecompressionsurgerytransforaminalfullendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressiontelrd
AT kelkaramey biomechanicalevaluationofanoveldecompressionsurgerytransforaminalfullendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressiontelrd
AT parajulidikshya biomechanicalevaluationofanoveldecompressionsurgerytransforaminalfullendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressiontelrd
AT sudershansushil biomechanicalevaluationofanoveldecompressionsurgerytransforaminalfullendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressiontelrd
AT goelvijayk biomechanicalevaluationofanoveldecompressionsurgerytransforaminalfullendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressiontelrd
AT sairyokoichi biomechanicalevaluationofanoveldecompressionsurgerytransforaminalfullendoscopiclateralrecessdecompressiontelrd