Cargando…

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the detection of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients

BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a commonly used test to detect prostate cancer. Attention has mostly focused on the use of PSA in screening asymptomatic patients, but the diagnostic accuracy of PSA for prostate cancer in patients with symptoms is less well understood. METHODS: A syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merriel, Samuel W. D., Pocock, Lucy, Gilbert, Emma, Creavin, Sam, Walter, Fiona M., Spencer, Anne, Hamilton, Willie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02230-y
_version_ 1784646155128274944
author Merriel, Samuel W. D.
Pocock, Lucy
Gilbert, Emma
Creavin, Sam
Walter, Fiona M.
Spencer, Anne
Hamilton, Willie
author_facet Merriel, Samuel W. D.
Pocock, Lucy
Gilbert, Emma
Creavin, Sam
Walter, Fiona M.
Spencer, Anne
Hamilton, Willie
author_sort Merriel, Samuel W. D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a commonly used test to detect prostate cancer. Attention has mostly focused on the use of PSA in screening asymptomatic patients, but the diagnostic accuracy of PSA for prostate cancer in patients with symptoms is less well understood. METHODS: A systematic database search was conducted of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library. Studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of PSA for prostate cancer in patients with symptoms were included. Two investigators independently assessed the titles and abstracts of all database search hits and full texts of potentially relevant studies against the inclusion criteria, and data extracted into a proforma. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool by two investigators independently. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy were calculated with meta-analysis using bivariate mixed effects regression. RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-three search hits were assessed by title and abstract after de-duplication, with 75 full text papers reviewed. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, 18 of which were conducted in secondary care settings with one from a screening study cohort. All studies used histology obtained by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS) as a reference test; usually only for patients with elevated PSA or abnormal prostate examination. Pooled data from 14,489 patients found estimated sensitivity of PSA for prostate cancer was 0.93 (95% CI 0.88, 0.96) and specificity was 0.20 (95% CI 0.12, 0.33). The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.72 (95% CI 0.68, 0.76). All studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias in at least one QUADAS-2 domain. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available evidence suggests PSA is highly sensitive but poorly specific for prostate cancer detection in symptomatic patients. However, significant limitations in study design and reference test reduces the certainty of this estimate. There is very limited evidence for the performance of PSA in primary care, the healthcare setting where most PSA testing is performed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-021-02230-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8819971
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88199712022-02-08 Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the detection of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients Merriel, Samuel W. D. Pocock, Lucy Gilbert, Emma Creavin, Sam Walter, Fiona M. Spencer, Anne Hamilton, Willie BMC Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a commonly used test to detect prostate cancer. Attention has mostly focused on the use of PSA in screening asymptomatic patients, but the diagnostic accuracy of PSA for prostate cancer in patients with symptoms is less well understood. METHODS: A systematic database search was conducted of Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library. Studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of PSA for prostate cancer in patients with symptoms were included. Two investigators independently assessed the titles and abstracts of all database search hits and full texts of potentially relevant studies against the inclusion criteria, and data extracted into a proforma. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool by two investigators independently. Summary estimates of diagnostic accuracy were calculated with meta-analysis using bivariate mixed effects regression. RESULTS: Five hundred sixty-three search hits were assessed by title and abstract after de-duplication, with 75 full text papers reviewed. Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria, 18 of which were conducted in secondary care settings with one from a screening study cohort. All studies used histology obtained by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS) as a reference test; usually only for patients with elevated PSA or abnormal prostate examination. Pooled data from 14,489 patients found estimated sensitivity of PSA for prostate cancer was 0.93 (95% CI 0.88, 0.96) and specificity was 0.20 (95% CI 0.12, 0.33). The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.72 (95% CI 0.68, 0.76). All studies were assessed as having a high risk of bias in at least one QUADAS-2 domain. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available evidence suggests PSA is highly sensitive but poorly specific for prostate cancer detection in symptomatic patients. However, significant limitations in study design and reference test reduces the certainty of this estimate. There is very limited evidence for the performance of PSA in primary care, the healthcare setting where most PSA testing is performed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12916-021-02230-y. BioMed Central 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8819971/ /pubmed/35125113 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02230-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Merriel, Samuel W. D.
Pocock, Lucy
Gilbert, Emma
Creavin, Sam
Walter, Fiona M.
Spencer, Anne
Hamilton, Willie
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the detection of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients
title Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the detection of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients
title_full Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the detection of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients
title_fullStr Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the detection of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the detection of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients
title_short Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the detection of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of prostate-specific antigen (psa) for the detection of prostate cancer in symptomatic patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8819971/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35125113
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02230-y
work_keys_str_mv AT merrielsamuelwd systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofprostatespecificantigenpsaforthedetectionofprostatecancerinsymptomaticpatients
AT pococklucy systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofprostatespecificantigenpsaforthedetectionofprostatecancerinsymptomaticpatients
AT gilbertemma systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofprostatespecificantigenpsaforthedetectionofprostatecancerinsymptomaticpatients
AT creavinsam systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofprostatespecificantigenpsaforthedetectionofprostatecancerinsymptomaticpatients
AT walterfionam systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofprostatespecificantigenpsaforthedetectionofprostatecancerinsymptomaticpatients
AT spenceranne systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofprostatespecificantigenpsaforthedetectionofprostatecancerinsymptomaticpatients
AT hamiltonwillie systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofthediagnosticaccuracyofprostatespecificantigenpsaforthedetectionofprostatecancerinsymptomaticpatients