Cargando…

Assessment of standing balance in normal versus cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients

BACKGROUND: The Romberg test is used to identify balance issues in patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM), but has subjective interpretation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate force plate pressure readings during a Romberg test to quantify postural control. METHODS: Quantitative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ver, Mikhail Lew Perez, Gum, Jeffrey L., Glassman, Steven D., Carreon, Leah Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2020.100023
_version_ 1784646165221867520
author Ver, Mikhail Lew Perez
Gum, Jeffrey L.
Glassman, Steven D.
Carreon, Leah Y.
author_facet Ver, Mikhail Lew Perez
Gum, Jeffrey L.
Glassman, Steven D.
Carreon, Leah Y.
author_sort Ver, Mikhail Lew Perez
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Romberg test is used to identify balance issues in patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM), but has subjective interpretation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate force plate pressure readings during a Romberg test to quantify postural control. METHODS: Quantitative Romberg force plate readings with eyes open and closed in patients with CSM were obtained and changes in balance measurements were compared to a normal population (N = 28, mean age 39 ± 7 years). RESULTS: We identified 30 CSM patients with a mean age of 58 ± 10 years. Majority of patients presented with pain (90%) and neurologic symptoms (83%). Cord compression on imaging was identified in 90%. Mean eyes closed Romberg measurements were larger compared to eyes open measurements in CSM patients (p < 0.01). There was a larger change in Romberg (∆R) measurements in CSM compared to normals for total sway area (TSA, 14.18 vs 0.02 cm(2), p < 0.001) and average speed (AS, 2.07 vs 0.23 cm/s, p < 0.001). The presence of long tract signs produced larger ∆R (TSA, 15.35 vs 0.02 cm(2), p = 0.003; AS, 2.21 vs 0.23 cm/s, p = 0.001), and those with identified cord compression on imaging also had larger ∆R (TSA, 15.1 vs 0.02 cm(2), p < 0.001; AS, 2.17 vs 0.23 cm/s, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Standing balance can be quantified in patients with CSM and is worse when compared to a normal population. Long tract signs and cord compression in imaging translates to worse balance in myelopathic patients. The use of quantitative Romberg measurements help evaluate balance in CSM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8820038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88200382022-02-08 Assessment of standing balance in normal versus cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients Ver, Mikhail Lew Perez Gum, Jeffrey L. Glassman, Steven D. Carreon, Leah Y. N Am Spine Soc J Clinical Studies BACKGROUND: The Romberg test is used to identify balance issues in patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM), but has subjective interpretation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate force plate pressure readings during a Romberg test to quantify postural control. METHODS: Quantitative Romberg force plate readings with eyes open and closed in patients with CSM were obtained and changes in balance measurements were compared to a normal population (N = 28, mean age 39 ± 7 years). RESULTS: We identified 30 CSM patients with a mean age of 58 ± 10 years. Majority of patients presented with pain (90%) and neurologic symptoms (83%). Cord compression on imaging was identified in 90%. Mean eyes closed Romberg measurements were larger compared to eyes open measurements in CSM patients (p < 0.01). There was a larger change in Romberg (∆R) measurements in CSM compared to normals for total sway area (TSA, 14.18 vs 0.02 cm(2), p < 0.001) and average speed (AS, 2.07 vs 0.23 cm/s, p < 0.001). The presence of long tract signs produced larger ∆R (TSA, 15.35 vs 0.02 cm(2), p = 0.003; AS, 2.21 vs 0.23 cm/s, p = 0.001), and those with identified cord compression on imaging also had larger ∆R (TSA, 15.1 vs 0.02 cm(2), p < 0.001; AS, 2.17 vs 0.23 cm/s, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Standing balance can be quantified in patients with CSM and is worse when compared to a normal population. Long tract signs and cord compression in imaging translates to worse balance in myelopathic patients. The use of quantitative Romberg measurements help evaluate balance in CSM. Elsevier 2020-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8820038/ /pubmed/35141591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2020.100023 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Studies
Ver, Mikhail Lew Perez
Gum, Jeffrey L.
Glassman, Steven D.
Carreon, Leah Y.
Assessment of standing balance in normal versus cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients
title Assessment of standing balance in normal versus cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients
title_full Assessment of standing balance in normal versus cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients
title_fullStr Assessment of standing balance in normal versus cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of standing balance in normal versus cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients
title_short Assessment of standing balance in normal versus cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients
title_sort assessment of standing balance in normal versus cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients
topic Clinical Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35141591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2020.100023
work_keys_str_mv AT vermikhaillewperez assessmentofstandingbalanceinnormalversuscervicalspondyloticmyelopathypatients
AT gumjeffreyl assessmentofstandingbalanceinnormalversuscervicalspondyloticmyelopathypatients
AT glassmanstevend assessmentofstandingbalanceinnormalversuscervicalspondyloticmyelopathypatients
AT carreonleahy assessmentofstandingbalanceinnormalversuscervicalspondyloticmyelopathypatients