Cargando…

How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory

Abstract. When individuals suppress secret information, they should keep this omission in mind to not let this information slip out in future situations. Following recent findings about automatic memory retrieval of outright lies, we hypothesized that suppression tendencies are also automatically re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schreckenbach, Franziska, Sprengholz, Philipp, Rothermund, Klaus, Koranyi, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hogrefe Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000504
_version_ 1784646186320265216
author Schreckenbach, Franziska
Sprengholz, Philipp
Rothermund, Klaus
Koranyi, Nicolas
author_facet Schreckenbach, Franziska
Sprengholz, Philipp
Rothermund, Klaus
Koranyi, Nicolas
author_sort Schreckenbach, Franziska
collection PubMed
description Abstract. When individuals suppress secret information, they should keep this omission in mind to not let this information slip out in future situations. Following recent findings about automatic memory retrieval of outright lies, we hypothesized that suppression tendencies are also automatically retrieved from memory when being confronted with a question to which one has previously omitted secret information. In an online study, participants first had to withhold information about a fictitious love affair during a simulated chat with their relationship partner. To assess automatic suppression tendencies, we developed an indirect response time measure wherein a key that had previously been established to indicate suppression now had to be pressed in response to word stimuli that were presented in a specific color. We found implicit suppression tendencies for words that had been withheld during the interview if they were presented following the prime that involved the question which the secret answer referred to. The question primes or the secret information alone did not elicit a suppression tendency, indicating that suppression responses were automatically retrieved from memory after re-encountering the combination of the question and the critical answer. The results are discussed regarding the theoretical implications for automatic memory processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8820223
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Hogrefe Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88202232022-02-08 How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory Schreckenbach, Franziska Sprengholz, Philipp Rothermund, Klaus Koranyi, Nicolas Exp Psychol Research Article Abstract. When individuals suppress secret information, they should keep this omission in mind to not let this information slip out in future situations. Following recent findings about automatic memory retrieval of outright lies, we hypothesized that suppression tendencies are also automatically retrieved from memory when being confronted with a question to which one has previously omitted secret information. In an online study, participants first had to withhold information about a fictitious love affair during a simulated chat with their relationship partner. To assess automatic suppression tendencies, we developed an indirect response time measure wherein a key that had previously been established to indicate suppression now had to be pressed in response to word stimuli that were presented in a specific color. We found implicit suppression tendencies for words that had been withheld during the interview if they were presented following the prime that involved the question which the secret answer referred to. The question primes or the secret information alone did not elicit a suppression tendency, indicating that suppression responses were automatically retrieved from memory after re-encountering the combination of the question and the critical answer. The results are discussed regarding the theoretical implications for automatic memory processes. Hogrefe Publishing 2021-03-04 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8820223/ /pubmed/33661039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000504 Text en © 2020 Hogrefe Publishing Distributed under the Hogrefe OpenMind License (https://doi.org/10.1027/a000001/)
spellingShingle Research Article
Schreckenbach, Franziska
Sprengholz, Philipp
Rothermund, Klaus
Koranyi, Nicolas
How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory
title How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory
title_full How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory
title_fullStr How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory
title_full_unstemmed How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory
title_short How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory
title_sort how to remember something you didn't say: lies of omission can be stored and retrieved from memory
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820223/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000504
work_keys_str_mv AT schreckenbachfranziska howtoremembersomethingyoudidntsayliesofomissioncanbestoredandretrievedfrommemory
AT sprengholzphilipp howtoremembersomethingyoudidntsayliesofomissioncanbestoredandretrievedfrommemory
AT rothermundklaus howtoremembersomethingyoudidntsayliesofomissioncanbestoredandretrievedfrommemory
AT koranyinicolas howtoremembersomethingyoudidntsayliesofomissioncanbestoredandretrievedfrommemory