Cargando…
How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory
Abstract. When individuals suppress secret information, they should keep this omission in mind to not let this information slip out in future situations. Following recent findings about automatic memory retrieval of outright lies, we hypothesized that suppression tendencies are also automatically re...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hogrefe Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000504 |
_version_ | 1784646186320265216 |
---|---|
author | Schreckenbach, Franziska Sprengholz, Philipp Rothermund, Klaus Koranyi, Nicolas |
author_facet | Schreckenbach, Franziska Sprengholz, Philipp Rothermund, Klaus Koranyi, Nicolas |
author_sort | Schreckenbach, Franziska |
collection | PubMed |
description | Abstract. When individuals suppress secret information, they should keep this omission in mind to not let this information slip out in future situations. Following recent findings about automatic memory retrieval of outright lies, we hypothesized that suppression tendencies are also automatically retrieved from memory when being confronted with a question to which one has previously omitted secret information. In an online study, participants first had to withhold information about a fictitious love affair during a simulated chat with their relationship partner. To assess automatic suppression tendencies, we developed an indirect response time measure wherein a key that had previously been established to indicate suppression now had to be pressed in response to word stimuli that were presented in a specific color. We found implicit suppression tendencies for words that had been withheld during the interview if they were presented following the prime that involved the question which the secret answer referred to. The question primes or the secret information alone did not elicit a suppression tendency, indicating that suppression responses were automatically retrieved from memory after re-encountering the combination of the question and the critical answer. The results are discussed regarding the theoretical implications for automatic memory processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8820223 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hogrefe Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88202232022-02-08 How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory Schreckenbach, Franziska Sprengholz, Philipp Rothermund, Klaus Koranyi, Nicolas Exp Psychol Research Article Abstract. When individuals suppress secret information, they should keep this omission in mind to not let this information slip out in future situations. Following recent findings about automatic memory retrieval of outright lies, we hypothesized that suppression tendencies are also automatically retrieved from memory when being confronted with a question to which one has previously omitted secret information. In an online study, participants first had to withhold information about a fictitious love affair during a simulated chat with their relationship partner. To assess automatic suppression tendencies, we developed an indirect response time measure wherein a key that had previously been established to indicate suppression now had to be pressed in response to word stimuli that were presented in a specific color. We found implicit suppression tendencies for words that had been withheld during the interview if they were presented following the prime that involved the question which the secret answer referred to. The question primes or the secret information alone did not elicit a suppression tendency, indicating that suppression responses were automatically retrieved from memory after re-encountering the combination of the question and the critical answer. The results are discussed regarding the theoretical implications for automatic memory processes. Hogrefe Publishing 2021-03-04 2020-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8820223/ /pubmed/33661039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000504 Text en © 2020 Hogrefe Publishing Distributed under the Hogrefe OpenMind License (https://doi.org/10.1027/a000001/) |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schreckenbach, Franziska Sprengholz, Philipp Rothermund, Klaus Koranyi, Nicolas How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory |
title | How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory |
title_full | How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory |
title_fullStr | How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory |
title_full_unstemmed | How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory |
title_short | How to Remember Something You Didn't Say: Lies of Omission Can Be Stored and Retrieved from Memory |
title_sort | how to remember something you didn't say: lies of omission can be stored and retrieved from memory |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820223/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000504 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schreckenbachfranziska howtoremembersomethingyoudidntsayliesofomissioncanbestoredandretrievedfrommemory AT sprengholzphilipp howtoremembersomethingyoudidntsayliesofomissioncanbestoredandretrievedfrommemory AT rothermundklaus howtoremembersomethingyoudidntsayliesofomissioncanbestoredandretrievedfrommemory AT koranyinicolas howtoremembersomethingyoudidntsayliesofomissioncanbestoredandretrievedfrommemory |