Cargando…

Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias

Abstract. How do people judge the veracity of a message? The negativity bias in judgments of truth describes the phenomenon that the same message is more likely judged as true when framed negatively compared to positively. This manuscript investigates the negativity bias in conditions of psychologic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaffé, Mariela E., Greifeneder, Rainer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hogrefe Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33167821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000493
_version_ 1784646186563534848
author Jaffé, Mariela E.
Greifeneder, Rainer
author_facet Jaffé, Mariela E.
Greifeneder, Rainer
author_sort Jaffé, Mariela E.
collection PubMed
description Abstract. How do people judge the veracity of a message? The negativity bias in judgments of truth describes the phenomenon that the same message is more likely judged as true when framed negatively compared to positively. This manuscript investigates the negativity bias in conditions of psychological proximity and the possibility that the bias decreases when distance increases. This notion is informed by construal level theory, which holds that negative information is more salient and weighed more strongly in conditions of psychological proximity compared to distance. Against this background, we hypothesize that a negativity bias likely occurs in conditions of proximity. With increasing psychological distance, however, positively compared to negatively framed information is more likely to be judged true, therefore attenuating or even reversing the bias. Two studies provide preliminary yet weak support for this hypothesis. A final registered study put the preliminary conclusions to a critical test and yielded consistent results: We find a significant interaction between frame and distance, indicating a descriptive trend for a negativity bias in conditions of proximity, yet a positivity bias in conditions of distance. This interaction illustrates that psychological distance may impact the negativity bias in truth judgments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8820224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hogrefe Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88202242022-02-08 Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias Jaffé, Mariela E. Greifeneder, Rainer Exp Psychol Registered Report Abstract. How do people judge the veracity of a message? The negativity bias in judgments of truth describes the phenomenon that the same message is more likely judged as true when framed negatively compared to positively. This manuscript investigates the negativity bias in conditions of psychological proximity and the possibility that the bias decreases when distance increases. This notion is informed by construal level theory, which holds that negative information is more salient and weighed more strongly in conditions of psychological proximity compared to distance. Against this background, we hypothesize that a negativity bias likely occurs in conditions of proximity. With increasing psychological distance, however, positively compared to negatively framed information is more likely to be judged true, therefore attenuating or even reversing the bias. Two studies provide preliminary yet weak support for this hypothesis. A final registered study put the preliminary conclusions to a critical test and yielded consistent results: We find a significant interaction between frame and distance, indicating a descriptive trend for a negativity bias in conditions of proximity, yet a positivity bias in conditions of distance. This interaction illustrates that psychological distance may impact the negativity bias in truth judgments. Hogrefe Publishing 2020-11-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8820224/ /pubmed/33167821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000493 Text en © 2020 Hogrefe Publishing Distributed under the Hogrefe OpenMind License https://doi.org/10.1027/a000001
spellingShingle Registered Report
Jaffé, Mariela E.
Greifeneder, Rainer
Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias
title Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias
title_full Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias
title_fullStr Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias
title_full_unstemmed Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias
title_short Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias
title_sort negative is true here and now, but not so much there and then: on the impact of psychological distance on the negativity bias
topic Registered Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33167821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000493
work_keys_str_mv AT jaffemarielae negativeistruehereandnowbutnotsomuchthereandthenontheimpactofpsychologicaldistanceonthenegativitybias
AT greifenederrainer negativeistruehereandnowbutnotsomuchthereandthenontheimpactofpsychologicaldistanceonthenegativitybias