Cargando…
Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias
Abstract. How do people judge the veracity of a message? The negativity bias in judgments of truth describes the phenomenon that the same message is more likely judged as true when framed negatively compared to positively. This manuscript investigates the negativity bias in conditions of psychologic...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hogrefe Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33167821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000493 |
_version_ | 1784646186563534848 |
---|---|
author | Jaffé, Mariela E. Greifeneder, Rainer |
author_facet | Jaffé, Mariela E. Greifeneder, Rainer |
author_sort | Jaffé, Mariela E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Abstract. How do people judge the veracity of a message? The negativity bias in judgments of truth describes the phenomenon that the same message is more likely judged as true when framed negatively compared to positively. This manuscript investigates the negativity bias in conditions of psychological proximity and the possibility that the bias decreases when distance increases. This notion is informed by construal level theory, which holds that negative information is more salient and weighed more strongly in conditions of psychological proximity compared to distance. Against this background, we hypothesize that a negativity bias likely occurs in conditions of proximity. With increasing psychological distance, however, positively compared to negatively framed information is more likely to be judged true, therefore attenuating or even reversing the bias. Two studies provide preliminary yet weak support for this hypothesis. A final registered study put the preliminary conclusions to a critical test and yielded consistent results: We find a significant interaction between frame and distance, indicating a descriptive trend for a negativity bias in conditions of proximity, yet a positivity bias in conditions of distance. This interaction illustrates that psychological distance may impact the negativity bias in truth judgments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8820224 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hogrefe Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88202242022-02-08 Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias Jaffé, Mariela E. Greifeneder, Rainer Exp Psychol Registered Report Abstract. How do people judge the veracity of a message? The negativity bias in judgments of truth describes the phenomenon that the same message is more likely judged as true when framed negatively compared to positively. This manuscript investigates the negativity bias in conditions of psychological proximity and the possibility that the bias decreases when distance increases. This notion is informed by construal level theory, which holds that negative information is more salient and weighed more strongly in conditions of psychological proximity compared to distance. Against this background, we hypothesize that a negativity bias likely occurs in conditions of proximity. With increasing psychological distance, however, positively compared to negatively framed information is more likely to be judged true, therefore attenuating or even reversing the bias. Two studies provide preliminary yet weak support for this hypothesis. A final registered study put the preliminary conclusions to a critical test and yielded consistent results: We find a significant interaction between frame and distance, indicating a descriptive trend for a negativity bias in conditions of proximity, yet a positivity bias in conditions of distance. This interaction illustrates that psychological distance may impact the negativity bias in truth judgments. Hogrefe Publishing 2020-11-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8820224/ /pubmed/33167821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000493 Text en © 2020 Hogrefe Publishing Distributed under the Hogrefe OpenMind License https://doi.org/10.1027/a000001 |
spellingShingle | Registered Report Jaffé, Mariela E. Greifeneder, Rainer Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias |
title | Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and
Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias |
title_full | Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and
Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias |
title_fullStr | Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and
Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias |
title_full_unstemmed | Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and
Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias |
title_short | Negative Is True Here and Now, But Not So Much There and
Then: On the Impact of Psychological Distance on the Negativity Bias |
title_sort | negative is true here and now, but not so much there and
then: on the impact of psychological distance on the negativity bias |
topic | Registered Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33167821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000493 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jaffemarielae negativeistruehereandnowbutnotsomuchthereandthenontheimpactofpsychologicaldistanceonthenegativitybias AT greifenederrainer negativeistruehereandnowbutnotsomuchthereandthenontheimpactofpsychologicaldistanceonthenegativitybias |