Cargando…

Pleasantness Only?: How Sensory and Affective Attributes Describe Touch Targeting C-Tactile Fibers

Abstract. When gently stroked with velocities between 0.1 and 30 cm/s, participants typically rate velocities around 3 cm/s as most pleasant, and the ratings follow an inverted u-shape. This pleasantness curve correlates often, but not always, with the firing rate of unmyelinated C-tactile (CT) affe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sailer, Uta, Hausmann, Marlene, Croy, Ilona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hogrefe Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33111658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000492
_version_ 1784646188851527680
author Sailer, Uta
Hausmann, Marlene
Croy, Ilona
author_facet Sailer, Uta
Hausmann, Marlene
Croy, Ilona
author_sort Sailer, Uta
collection PubMed
description Abstract. When gently stroked with velocities between 0.1 and 30 cm/s, participants typically rate velocities around 3 cm/s as most pleasant, and the ratings follow an inverted u-shape. This pleasantness curve correlates often, but not always, with the firing rate of unmyelinated C-tactile (CT) afferents, leading to the notion that CT afferents code for the hedonic or emotional aspect of gentle touch. However, there is also evidence that CT firing does not necessarily equal pleasantness, and the range of attributes that CT afferents code for is not known. Here, participants were stroked with different velocities assumed to activate CT afferents to a different extent while they rated the touch on several sensory and emotional attributes. We expected an inverted u-shaped rating curve for pleasantness and other emotional attributes, but not for sensory attributes. Inverted u-shaped rating patterns were found for the emotional attributes “pleasant” and “not burdensome,” but also for the sensory attribute “rough.” CT-directed stimulation is thus not only experienced as hedonic. The sensations arising from CTs together with all other types of mechanoreceptors might be centrally integrated into a percept that represents those aspects which are most salient for the stimulation at hand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8820238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hogrefe Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88202382022-02-08 Pleasantness Only?: How Sensory and Affective Attributes Describe Touch Targeting C-Tactile Fibers Sailer, Uta Hausmann, Marlene Croy, Ilona Exp Psychol Short Research Article Abstract. When gently stroked with velocities between 0.1 and 30 cm/s, participants typically rate velocities around 3 cm/s as most pleasant, and the ratings follow an inverted u-shape. This pleasantness curve correlates often, but not always, with the firing rate of unmyelinated C-tactile (CT) afferents, leading to the notion that CT afferents code for the hedonic or emotional aspect of gentle touch. However, there is also evidence that CT firing does not necessarily equal pleasantness, and the range of attributes that CT afferents code for is not known. Here, participants were stroked with different velocities assumed to activate CT afferents to a different extent while they rated the touch on several sensory and emotional attributes. We expected an inverted u-shaped rating curve for pleasantness and other emotional attributes, but not for sensory attributes. Inverted u-shaped rating patterns were found for the emotional attributes “pleasant” and “not burdensome,” but also for the sensory attribute “rough.” CT-directed stimulation is thus not only experienced as hedonic. The sensations arising from CTs together with all other types of mechanoreceptors might be centrally integrated into a percept that represents those aspects which are most salient for the stimulation at hand. Hogrefe Publishing 2020-10-27 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC8820238/ /pubmed/33111658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000492 Text en © 2020 Hogrefe Publishing https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Distributed as a Hogrefe OpenMind article under the license [CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) )]
spellingShingle Short Research Article
Sailer, Uta
Hausmann, Marlene
Croy, Ilona
Pleasantness Only?: How Sensory and Affective Attributes Describe Touch Targeting C-Tactile Fibers
title Pleasantness Only?: How Sensory and Affective Attributes Describe Touch Targeting C-Tactile Fibers
title_full Pleasantness Only?: How Sensory and Affective Attributes Describe Touch Targeting C-Tactile Fibers
title_fullStr Pleasantness Only?: How Sensory and Affective Attributes Describe Touch Targeting C-Tactile Fibers
title_full_unstemmed Pleasantness Only?: How Sensory and Affective Attributes Describe Touch Targeting C-Tactile Fibers
title_short Pleasantness Only?: How Sensory and Affective Attributes Describe Touch Targeting C-Tactile Fibers
title_sort pleasantness only?: how sensory and affective attributes describe touch targeting c-tactile fibers
topic Short Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820238/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33111658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000492
work_keys_str_mv AT saileruta pleasantnessonlyhowsensoryandaffectiveattributesdescribetouchtargetingctactilefibers
AT hausmannmarlene pleasantnessonlyhowsensoryandaffectiveattributesdescribetouchtargetingctactilefibers
AT croyilona pleasantnessonlyhowsensoryandaffectiveattributesdescribetouchtargetingctactilefibers