Cargando…
Regional anaesthesia practices in India: A nationwide survey
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There are no surveys documenting the existing regional anaesthesia (RA) practices in our country. This nationwide survey aims to record the existing RA practices, identify any lacunae that might exist and project the future direction of evolution. METHODS: This online survey con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35221356 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_803_21 |
_version_ | 1784646202745159680 |
---|---|
author | Ramachandran, Srinivasan Malhotra, Naveen Velayudhan, Savitri Singh Bajwa, Sukhminder Jit Joshi, Muralidhar Mehdiratta, Lalit Hiremath, Vishwanath R. |
author_facet | Ramachandran, Srinivasan Malhotra, Naveen Velayudhan, Savitri Singh Bajwa, Sukhminder Jit Joshi, Muralidhar Mehdiratta, Lalit Hiremath, Vishwanath R. |
author_sort | Ramachandran, Srinivasan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There are no surveys documenting the existing regional anaesthesia (RA) practices in our country. This nationwide survey aims to record the existing RA practices, identify any lacunae that might exist and project the future direction of evolution. METHODS: This online survey consisting of 31 questions was sent to all members of the Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists and addressed participants’ demographic features, central neuraxial block and peripheral nerve block practices, drug selection, RA training and safety measures. The data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 24.0. All categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 2141 responses were received, with participants distributed across the country. Forty-two per cent of the respondents reported that more than 60% of surgeries were performed under RA. Most of the participants use ‘traditional’ test dose for epidural space confirmation. Fifty participants (2.4%) use ultrasound for neuraxial space identification. Twenty per cent of the participants use a checklist for monitoring post-operative epidural analgesia. 6.7% have undergone specialised training in RA. Around 3.5% of the respondents have performed a wrong-side block. 31.4% of the respondents store intralipid in the operating room. CONCLUSION: The current survey highlights the prevailing practices, various deficiencies in monitoring and the need for RA training programmes. The data accrued can serve as a baseline for future comparison. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8820327 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88203272022-02-24 Regional anaesthesia practices in India: A nationwide survey Ramachandran, Srinivasan Malhotra, Naveen Velayudhan, Savitri Singh Bajwa, Sukhminder Jit Joshi, Muralidhar Mehdiratta, Lalit Hiremath, Vishwanath R. Indian J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There are no surveys documenting the existing regional anaesthesia (RA) practices in our country. This nationwide survey aims to record the existing RA practices, identify any lacunae that might exist and project the future direction of evolution. METHODS: This online survey consisting of 31 questions was sent to all members of the Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists and addressed participants’ demographic features, central neuraxial block and peripheral nerve block practices, drug selection, RA training and safety measures. The data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 24.0. All categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 2141 responses were received, with participants distributed across the country. Forty-two per cent of the respondents reported that more than 60% of surgeries were performed under RA. Most of the participants use ‘traditional’ test dose for epidural space confirmation. Fifty participants (2.4%) use ultrasound for neuraxial space identification. Twenty per cent of the participants use a checklist for monitoring post-operative epidural analgesia. 6.7% have undergone specialised training in RA. Around 3.5% of the respondents have performed a wrong-side block. 31.4% of the respondents store intralipid in the operating room. CONCLUSION: The current survey highlights the prevailing practices, various deficiencies in monitoring and the need for RA training programmes. The data accrued can serve as a baseline for future comparison. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-12 2021-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8820327/ /pubmed/35221356 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_803_21 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ramachandran, Srinivasan Malhotra, Naveen Velayudhan, Savitri Singh Bajwa, Sukhminder Jit Joshi, Muralidhar Mehdiratta, Lalit Hiremath, Vishwanath R. Regional anaesthesia practices in India: A nationwide survey |
title | Regional anaesthesia practices in India: A nationwide survey |
title_full | Regional anaesthesia practices in India: A nationwide survey |
title_fullStr | Regional anaesthesia practices in India: A nationwide survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Regional anaesthesia practices in India: A nationwide survey |
title_short | Regional anaesthesia practices in India: A nationwide survey |
title_sort | regional anaesthesia practices in india: a nationwide survey |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820327/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35221356 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_803_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ramachandransrinivasan regionalanaesthesiapracticesinindiaanationwidesurvey AT malhotranaveen regionalanaesthesiapracticesinindiaanationwidesurvey AT velayudhansavitri regionalanaesthesiapracticesinindiaanationwidesurvey AT singhbajwasukhminderjit regionalanaesthesiapracticesinindiaanationwidesurvey AT joshimuralidhar regionalanaesthesiapracticesinindiaanationwidesurvey AT mehdirattalalit regionalanaesthesiapracticesinindiaanationwidesurvey AT hiremathvishwanathr regionalanaesthesiapracticesinindiaanationwidesurvey |