Cargando…

Combined Photoactivated Chromophore for Infectious Keratitis-Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (PACK-CXL) and Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty for Resistant Bacterial Keratitis

PURPOSE: To report the results of treating resistant bacterial keratitis by corneal collagen cross-linking followed by therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty and to compare with those of therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty alone. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the medical records of 33 eyes of 33...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bor’i, Ashraf, El-Haig, Wael M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35140457
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S348835
_version_ 1784646219934466048
author Bor’i, Ashraf
El-Haig, Wael M
author_facet Bor’i, Ashraf
El-Haig, Wael M
author_sort Bor’i, Ashraf
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To report the results of treating resistant bacterial keratitis by corneal collagen cross-linking followed by therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty and to compare with those of therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty alone. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the medical records of 33 eyes of 33 patients diagnosed with resistant bacterial keratitis. Fourteen eyes (14 patients) were treated with photoactivated chromophore for infectious keratitis corneal collagen cross-linking (PACK-CXL) followed by therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK) (group I) and 19 eyes (19 patients) were treated by TPK alone (group II). The main outcome measures were graft clarity and the mean best corrected visual acuity at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after penetrating keratoplasty. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 53.6 ± 1.9 years and 52.3 ± 1.8 years in group I and group II, respectively (p = 0.374), the mean ulcer size was 49.9 ± 16.2 mm(2) and 54.7.1 ± 15.1 mm(2) in group I and group II, respectively (p = 0.239), the mean corneal infiltrate size was 58.2 ± 17mm(2) and 59.9 ± 15.7 mm(2) in group I and group II, respectively (p = 0.384). Hypopyon was seen in 6 eyes (41.7%) in group I and in 8 eyes (42.1%) in group II. At the last follow-up visit, 12 corneal grafts (85.7%) maintained their clarity in group I while 13 corneal grafts (68.4%) maintained their clarity in group II (p = 0.037) and the mean best corrected visual acuity was 0.84 ± 0.63 log MAR in group I and 1.27 ± 0.81 log MAR in group II (p = 0.024). Postoperatively, one eye (7%) showed graft reinfection in group I that was controlled medically while 5 eyes (26.3%) showed resistant graft reinfection and ended in graft opacification in group II (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: In resistant bacterial keratitis, priming infected corneas with PACK-CXL before performing TPK improve the results in such cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8820449
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88204492022-02-08 Combined Photoactivated Chromophore for Infectious Keratitis-Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (PACK-CXL) and Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty for Resistant Bacterial Keratitis Bor’i, Ashraf El-Haig, Wael M Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: To report the results of treating resistant bacterial keratitis by corneal collagen cross-linking followed by therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty and to compare with those of therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty alone. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the medical records of 33 eyes of 33 patients diagnosed with resistant bacterial keratitis. Fourteen eyes (14 patients) were treated with photoactivated chromophore for infectious keratitis corneal collagen cross-linking (PACK-CXL) followed by therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty (TPK) (group I) and 19 eyes (19 patients) were treated by TPK alone (group II). The main outcome measures were graft clarity and the mean best corrected visual acuity at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months after penetrating keratoplasty. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 53.6 ± 1.9 years and 52.3 ± 1.8 years in group I and group II, respectively (p = 0.374), the mean ulcer size was 49.9 ± 16.2 mm(2) and 54.7.1 ± 15.1 mm(2) in group I and group II, respectively (p = 0.239), the mean corneal infiltrate size was 58.2 ± 17mm(2) and 59.9 ± 15.7 mm(2) in group I and group II, respectively (p = 0.384). Hypopyon was seen in 6 eyes (41.7%) in group I and in 8 eyes (42.1%) in group II. At the last follow-up visit, 12 corneal grafts (85.7%) maintained their clarity in group I while 13 corneal grafts (68.4%) maintained their clarity in group II (p = 0.037) and the mean best corrected visual acuity was 0.84 ± 0.63 log MAR in group I and 1.27 ± 0.81 log MAR in group II (p = 0.024). Postoperatively, one eye (7%) showed graft reinfection in group I that was controlled medically while 5 eyes (26.3%) showed resistant graft reinfection and ended in graft opacification in group II (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: In resistant bacterial keratitis, priming infected corneas with PACK-CXL before performing TPK improve the results in such cases. Dove 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8820449/ /pubmed/35140457 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S348835 Text en © 2022 Bor’i and El-Haig. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Bor’i, Ashraf
El-Haig, Wael M
Combined Photoactivated Chromophore for Infectious Keratitis-Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (PACK-CXL) and Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty for Resistant Bacterial Keratitis
title Combined Photoactivated Chromophore for Infectious Keratitis-Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (PACK-CXL) and Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty for Resistant Bacterial Keratitis
title_full Combined Photoactivated Chromophore for Infectious Keratitis-Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (PACK-CXL) and Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty for Resistant Bacterial Keratitis
title_fullStr Combined Photoactivated Chromophore for Infectious Keratitis-Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (PACK-CXL) and Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty for Resistant Bacterial Keratitis
title_full_unstemmed Combined Photoactivated Chromophore for Infectious Keratitis-Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (PACK-CXL) and Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty for Resistant Bacterial Keratitis
title_short Combined Photoactivated Chromophore for Infectious Keratitis-Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking (PACK-CXL) and Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty for Resistant Bacterial Keratitis
title_sort combined photoactivated chromophore for infectious keratitis-corneal collagen cross-linking (pack-cxl) and therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty for resistant bacterial keratitis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35140457
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S348835
work_keys_str_mv AT boriashraf combinedphotoactivatedchromophoreforinfectiouskeratitiscornealcollagencrosslinkingpackcxlandtherapeuticpenetratingkeratoplastyforresistantbacterialkeratitis
AT elhaigwaelm combinedphotoactivatedchromophoreforinfectiouskeratitiscornealcollagencrosslinkingpackcxlandtherapeuticpenetratingkeratoplastyforresistantbacterialkeratitis