Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Cost-Effectiveness, Clinical and Microbiological Parameters of Systemic Antibiotics Versus Local Drug Delivery in Aggressive Periodontitis
Background: Periodontitis is a biofilm-associated inflammatory disease of the periodontium in which microbial component contributes to its initiation that mainly includes chronic periodontitis and aggressive periodontitis (AgP). Aim: The present study aimed to ascertain a cost-effective treatment ap...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820473/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35154961 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20985 |
Sumario: | Background: Periodontitis is a biofilm-associated inflammatory disease of the periodontium in which microbial component contributes to its initiation that mainly includes chronic periodontitis and aggressive periodontitis (AgP). Aim: The present study aimed to ascertain a cost-effective treatment approach in AgP with minimal side effects by comparing systemic antibiotics (SA) and local drug delivery (LDD) as an adjunct to scaling and root planning (SRP). Furthermore, the objectives were to analyze its effect on clinical and microbial parameters. Materials and Methods: The participants were randomly divided into two groups A and B with eleven participants each. Group A was administered with Chlosite Gel [LDD] whereas group B with amoxicillin (AMX) 500 mg + metronidazole (MTZ) 400 mg [SA] thrice daily for 14 days. Clinical parameters such as plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), clinical attachment level (CAL), and pocket probing depth (PPD)] were recorded at baseline and three months postoperatively. Microbiological parameters i.e Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans (Aa) and Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) counts were also measured at baseline and after three months. Results: Statistically significant difference was observed in all clinical parameters i.e. PI, GI, CAL, and PPD after three months follow-up in groups A and B. Reduced bacterial load i.e. Aa and Pg was significant at three months in both the groups. However, on comparing the total expenditure of both the groups, group A ranged from 920-1480 ₹ while in group B it ranged from 330-360 ₹. Hence, lower expenditure in group B (3.7 fold) compared to group A was evident. Conclusions: Cost-effective approach recommended in the present study is mainly to promote awareness among periodontal patients in the public and private sectors, who refuse to get dental treatment due to fear of high expenditure. This can be attained by incorporating SA as an alternative to LDD in AgP patients. |
---|