Cargando…

Key drivers of fertility levels and differentials in India, at the national, state and population subgroup levels, 2015–2016: An application of Bongaarts’ proximate determinants model

OBJECTIVES: The transition to small family size is at an advanced phase in India, with a national TFR of 2.2 in 2015–16. This paper examines the roles of four key determinants of fertility—marriage, contraception, abortion and postpartum infecundability—for India, all 29 states and population subgro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Susheela, Shekhar, Chander, Bankole, Akinrinola, Acharya, Rajib, Audam, Suzette, Akinade, Temitope
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263532
_version_ 1784646246464487424
author Singh, Susheela
Shekhar, Chander
Bankole, Akinrinola
Acharya, Rajib
Audam, Suzette
Akinade, Temitope
author_facet Singh, Susheela
Shekhar, Chander
Bankole, Akinrinola
Acharya, Rajib
Audam, Suzette
Akinade, Temitope
author_sort Singh, Susheela
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The transition to small family size is at an advanced phase in India, with a national TFR of 2.2 in 2015–16. This paper examines the roles of four key determinants of fertility—marriage, contraception, abortion and postpartum infecundability—for India, all 29 states and population subgroups. METHODS: Data from the most recent available national survey, the National Family Health Survey, conducted in 2015–16, were used. The Bongaarts proximate determinants model was used to quantify the roles of the four key factors that largely determine fertility. Methodological contributions of this analysis are: adaptations of the model to the Indian context; measurement of the role of abortion; and provision of estimates for sub-groups nationally and by state: age, education, residence, wealth status and caste. RESULTS: Nationally, marriage is the most important determinant of the reduction in fertility from the biological maximum, contributing 36%, followed by contraception and abortion, contributing 24% and 23% respectively, and post-partum infecundability contributed 16%. This national pattern of contributions characterizes most states and subgroups. Abortion makes a larger contribution than contraception among young women and better educated women. Findings suggest that sterility and infertility play a greater than average role in Southern states; marriage practices in some Northeastern states; and male migration for less-educated women. The absence of stronger relationships between the key proximate fertility determinants and geography or socio-economic status suggests that as family size declined, the role of these determinants is increasingly homogenous. CONCLUSIONS: Findings argue for improvements across all states and subgroups, in provision of contraceptive care and safe abortion services, given the importance of these mechanisms for implementing fertility preferences. In-depth studies are needed to identify policy and program needs that depend on the barriers and vulnerabilities that exist in specific areas and population groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8820640
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88206402022-02-08 Key drivers of fertility levels and differentials in India, at the national, state and population subgroup levels, 2015–2016: An application of Bongaarts’ proximate determinants model Singh, Susheela Shekhar, Chander Bankole, Akinrinola Acharya, Rajib Audam, Suzette Akinade, Temitope PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: The transition to small family size is at an advanced phase in India, with a national TFR of 2.2 in 2015–16. This paper examines the roles of four key determinants of fertility—marriage, contraception, abortion and postpartum infecundability—for India, all 29 states and population subgroups. METHODS: Data from the most recent available national survey, the National Family Health Survey, conducted in 2015–16, were used. The Bongaarts proximate determinants model was used to quantify the roles of the four key factors that largely determine fertility. Methodological contributions of this analysis are: adaptations of the model to the Indian context; measurement of the role of abortion; and provision of estimates for sub-groups nationally and by state: age, education, residence, wealth status and caste. RESULTS: Nationally, marriage is the most important determinant of the reduction in fertility from the biological maximum, contributing 36%, followed by contraception and abortion, contributing 24% and 23% respectively, and post-partum infecundability contributed 16%. This national pattern of contributions characterizes most states and subgroups. Abortion makes a larger contribution than contraception among young women and better educated women. Findings suggest that sterility and infertility play a greater than average role in Southern states; marriage practices in some Northeastern states; and male migration for less-educated women. The absence of stronger relationships between the key proximate fertility determinants and geography or socio-economic status suggests that as family size declined, the role of these determinants is increasingly homogenous. CONCLUSIONS: Findings argue for improvements across all states and subgroups, in provision of contraceptive care and safe abortion services, given the importance of these mechanisms for implementing fertility preferences. In-depth studies are needed to identify policy and program needs that depend on the barriers and vulnerabilities that exist in specific areas and population groups. Public Library of Science 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8820640/ /pubmed/35130319 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263532 Text en © 2022 Singh et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Singh, Susheela
Shekhar, Chander
Bankole, Akinrinola
Acharya, Rajib
Audam, Suzette
Akinade, Temitope
Key drivers of fertility levels and differentials in India, at the national, state and population subgroup levels, 2015–2016: An application of Bongaarts’ proximate determinants model
title Key drivers of fertility levels and differentials in India, at the national, state and population subgroup levels, 2015–2016: An application of Bongaarts’ proximate determinants model
title_full Key drivers of fertility levels and differentials in India, at the national, state and population subgroup levels, 2015–2016: An application of Bongaarts’ proximate determinants model
title_fullStr Key drivers of fertility levels and differentials in India, at the national, state and population subgroup levels, 2015–2016: An application of Bongaarts’ proximate determinants model
title_full_unstemmed Key drivers of fertility levels and differentials in India, at the national, state and population subgroup levels, 2015–2016: An application of Bongaarts’ proximate determinants model
title_short Key drivers of fertility levels and differentials in India, at the national, state and population subgroup levels, 2015–2016: An application of Bongaarts’ proximate determinants model
title_sort key drivers of fertility levels and differentials in india, at the national, state and population subgroup levels, 2015–2016: an application of bongaarts’ proximate determinants model
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8820640/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130319
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263532
work_keys_str_mv AT singhsusheela keydriversoffertilitylevelsanddifferentialsinindiaatthenationalstateandpopulationsubgrouplevels20152016anapplicationofbongaartsproximatedeterminantsmodel
AT shekharchander keydriversoffertilitylevelsanddifferentialsinindiaatthenationalstateandpopulationsubgrouplevels20152016anapplicationofbongaartsproximatedeterminantsmodel
AT bankoleakinrinola keydriversoffertilitylevelsanddifferentialsinindiaatthenationalstateandpopulationsubgrouplevels20152016anapplicationofbongaartsproximatedeterminantsmodel
AT acharyarajib keydriversoffertilitylevelsanddifferentialsinindiaatthenationalstateandpopulationsubgrouplevels20152016anapplicationofbongaartsproximatedeterminantsmodel
AT audamsuzette keydriversoffertilitylevelsanddifferentialsinindiaatthenationalstateandpopulationsubgrouplevels20152016anapplicationofbongaartsproximatedeterminantsmodel
AT akinadetemitope keydriversoffertilitylevelsanddifferentialsinindiaatthenationalstateandpopulationsubgrouplevels20152016anapplicationofbongaartsproximatedeterminantsmodel