Cargando…

Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?

Dopamine receptor partial agonists (DRPAs; aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine) constitute a novel class of antipsychotics. Although they share a similar mechanism of action, DRPAs differ in their pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, or safety and tolerability. The antipsy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohr, Pavel, Masopust, Jirí, Kopeček, Miloslav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35145438
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.781946
_version_ 1784646357495054336
author Mohr, Pavel
Masopust, Jirí
Kopeček, Miloslav
author_facet Mohr, Pavel
Masopust, Jirí
Kopeček, Miloslav
author_sort Mohr, Pavel
collection PubMed
description Dopamine receptor partial agonists (DRPAs; aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine) constitute a novel class of antipsychotics. Although they share a similar mechanism of action, DRPAs differ in their pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, or safety and tolerability. The antipsychotic efficacy of all three drugs was established in several placebo-controlled randomized trials (RCTs) in schizophrenia, both acute phase and relapse prevention. In addition, each of the DRPA agents has been tested in other psychiatric disorders, including bipolar disorder or major depression. However, a few studies have examined their comparative clinical efficacy. There are no head-to-head comparisons between aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, or cariprazine. In two acute schizophrenia RCTs of cariprazine and brexpiprazole, aripiprazole was used as an indirect comparator to control for study sensitivity. To assess potential differences in the efficacy of DRPAs, we reviewed data from controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Our results showed that the acute antipsychotic effects of DRPAs, as measured by the number needed to treat, are comparable. The three agents were superior to placebo in acute treatment, and cariprazine was found to be effective in the reduction of primary negative symptoms of schizophrenia. In the therapy of bipolar disorder, aripiprazole and cariprazine showed antimanic efficacy, cariprazine was also effective in the management of bipolar depression, and aripiprazole was effective for relapse prevention. The addon administration of aripiprazole or brexpiprazole reduced symptoms of major depression. Aripiprazole can control acute agitation associated with psychosis or bipolar disorder; brexpiprazole showed the potential to manage agitation in dementia patients. Aripiprazole has also established evidence of efficacy in children and adolescents and other conditions: OCD, tic disorders, and autism spectrum disorder. Our review of published data suggests that in terms of clinical efficacy, DRPAs are a heterogeneous group, with each drug possessing its own therapeutic benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8821167
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88211672022-02-09 Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy? Mohr, Pavel Masopust, Jirí Kopeček, Miloslav Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Dopamine receptor partial agonists (DRPAs; aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine) constitute a novel class of antipsychotics. Although they share a similar mechanism of action, DRPAs differ in their pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, drug interactions, or safety and tolerability. The antipsychotic efficacy of all three drugs was established in several placebo-controlled randomized trials (RCTs) in schizophrenia, both acute phase and relapse prevention. In addition, each of the DRPA agents has been tested in other psychiatric disorders, including bipolar disorder or major depression. However, a few studies have examined their comparative clinical efficacy. There are no head-to-head comparisons between aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, or cariprazine. In two acute schizophrenia RCTs of cariprazine and brexpiprazole, aripiprazole was used as an indirect comparator to control for study sensitivity. To assess potential differences in the efficacy of DRPAs, we reviewed data from controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. Our results showed that the acute antipsychotic effects of DRPAs, as measured by the number needed to treat, are comparable. The three agents were superior to placebo in acute treatment, and cariprazine was found to be effective in the reduction of primary negative symptoms of schizophrenia. In the therapy of bipolar disorder, aripiprazole and cariprazine showed antimanic efficacy, cariprazine was also effective in the management of bipolar depression, and aripiprazole was effective for relapse prevention. The addon administration of aripiprazole or brexpiprazole reduced symptoms of major depression. Aripiprazole can control acute agitation associated with psychosis or bipolar disorder; brexpiprazole showed the potential to manage agitation in dementia patients. Aripiprazole has also established evidence of efficacy in children and adolescents and other conditions: OCD, tic disorders, and autism spectrum disorder. Our review of published data suggests that in terms of clinical efficacy, DRPAs are a heterogeneous group, with each drug possessing its own therapeutic benefits. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8821167/ /pubmed/35145438 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.781946 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mohr, Masopust and Kopeček. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Mohr, Pavel
Masopust, Jirí
Kopeček, Miloslav
Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?
title Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?
title_full Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?
title_fullStr Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?
title_full_unstemmed Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?
title_short Dopamine Receptor Partial Agonists: Do They Differ in Their Clinical Efficacy?
title_sort dopamine receptor partial agonists: do they differ in their clinical efficacy?
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821167/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35145438
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.781946
work_keys_str_mv AT mohrpavel dopaminereceptorpartialagonistsdotheydifferintheirclinicalefficacy
AT masopustjiri dopaminereceptorpartialagonistsdotheydifferintheirclinicalefficacy
AT kopecekmiloslav dopaminereceptorpartialagonistsdotheydifferintheirclinicalefficacy