Cargando…
Subcortical Backup Fixation in ACL Reconstruction
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries result in knee instability in a majority of patients. Repair and reconstruction techniques have continually evolved over the past several decades. ACL reconstruction outcomes are directly impacted by physical therapy with early range of motion, weightbearing...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2021.10.006 |
_version_ | 1784646370600157184 |
---|---|
author | Gee, Shawn M. Zhou, Liang Donohue, Michael A. Posner, Matthew A. |
author_facet | Gee, Shawn M. Zhou, Liang Donohue, Michael A. Posner, Matthew A. |
author_sort | Gee, Shawn M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries result in knee instability in a majority of patients. Repair and reconstruction techniques have continually evolved over the past several decades. ACL reconstruction outcomes are directly impacted by physical therapy with early range of motion, weightbearing, and progressive strengthening. Therefore, the fixation must be sufficient to withstand the tensile and shear stresses across the graft construct during the biological healing phase. Occasionally, the primary fixation device is not strong enough to withstand these stresses. In turn, supplementary fixation devices, which are important especially in cases of revision ACL reconstruction, are imperfect. They occasionally become symptomatic, requiring hardware removal. Posts and washers require bicortical fixation, with moderate-sized holes in the tibia. Biocomposite screws rely on friction in the bone–screw interface, making them susceptible to failure. Tensioning can be problematic with the use of a post-and-washer construct. Subcortical fixation, which has not previously been described as a backup fixation method, provides several advantages. It requires a smaller, unicortical hole and provides fixation with a much lower profile than post-and-washer and interference-screw constructs. This is the first description of subcortical backup fixation in ACL reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8821247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88212472022-02-11 Subcortical Backup Fixation in ACL Reconstruction Gee, Shawn M. Zhou, Liang Donohue, Michael A. Posner, Matthew A. Arthrosc Tech Technical Note Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries result in knee instability in a majority of patients. Repair and reconstruction techniques have continually evolved over the past several decades. ACL reconstruction outcomes are directly impacted by physical therapy with early range of motion, weightbearing, and progressive strengthening. Therefore, the fixation must be sufficient to withstand the tensile and shear stresses across the graft construct during the biological healing phase. Occasionally, the primary fixation device is not strong enough to withstand these stresses. In turn, supplementary fixation devices, which are important especially in cases of revision ACL reconstruction, are imperfect. They occasionally become symptomatic, requiring hardware removal. Posts and washers require bicortical fixation, with moderate-sized holes in the tibia. Biocomposite screws rely on friction in the bone–screw interface, making them susceptible to failure. Tensioning can be problematic with the use of a post-and-washer construct. Subcortical fixation, which has not previously been described as a backup fixation method, provides several advantages. It requires a smaller, unicortical hole and provides fixation with a much lower profile than post-and-washer and interference-screw constructs. This is the first description of subcortical backup fixation in ACL reconstruction. Elsevier 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8821247/ /pubmed/35155109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2021.10.006 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Technical Note Gee, Shawn M. Zhou, Liang Donohue, Michael A. Posner, Matthew A. Subcortical Backup Fixation in ACL Reconstruction |
title | Subcortical Backup Fixation in ACL Reconstruction |
title_full | Subcortical Backup Fixation in ACL Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Subcortical Backup Fixation in ACL Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Subcortical Backup Fixation in ACL Reconstruction |
title_short | Subcortical Backup Fixation in ACL Reconstruction |
title_sort | subcortical backup fixation in acl reconstruction |
topic | Technical Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2021.10.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geeshawnm subcorticalbackupfixationinaclreconstruction AT zhouliang subcorticalbackupfixationinaclreconstruction AT donohuemichaela subcorticalbackupfixationinaclreconstruction AT posnermatthewa subcorticalbackupfixationinaclreconstruction |