Cargando…

Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant

The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) system for variant classification is score based with five classes: benign, likely benign, variant of unknown significance (VUS), likely pathogenic, and pathogenic. Here, we present a variant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houge, Gunnar, Laner, Andreas, Cirak, Sebahattin, de Leeuw, Nicole, Scheffer, Hans, den Dunnen, Johan T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00903-z
_version_ 1784646434724773888
author Houge, Gunnar
Laner, Andreas
Cirak, Sebahattin
de Leeuw, Nicole
Scheffer, Hans
den Dunnen, Johan T.
author_facet Houge, Gunnar
Laner, Andreas
Cirak, Sebahattin
de Leeuw, Nicole
Scheffer, Hans
den Dunnen, Johan T.
author_sort Houge, Gunnar
collection PubMed
description The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) system for variant classification is score based with five classes: benign, likely benign, variant of unknown significance (VUS), likely pathogenic, and pathogenic. Here, we present a variant classification model that can be an add-on or alternative to ACMG classification: A stepwise system that can classify any type of genetic variant (e.g., hypomorphic alleles, imprinted alleles, copy number variants, runs of homozygosity, enhancer variants, and variants related to traits). We call it the ABC system because classification is first functional (A), then clinical (B), and optionally a standard comment that fits the clinical question is selected (C). Both steps A and B have 1–5 grading when knowledge is sufficient, if not, class “zero” is assigned. Functional grading (A) only concerns biological consequences with the stages normal function (1), likely normal function (2), hypothetical functional effect (3), likely functional effect (4), and proven functional effect (5). Clinical grading (B) is genotype–phenotype focused with the stages “right type of gene” (1), risk factor (2), and pathogenic (3–5, depending on penetrance). Both grades are listed for each variant and combined to generate a joint class ranging from A to F. Importantly, the A–F classes are linked to standard comments, reflecting laboratory or national policy. In step A, the VUS class is split into class 0 (true unknown) and class 3 (hypothetical functional effect based on molecular predictions or de novo occurrence), providing a rationale for variant-of-interest reporting when the clinical picture could fit the finding. The system gives clinicians a better guide to variant significance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8821602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88216022022-02-17 Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant Houge, Gunnar Laner, Andreas Cirak, Sebahattin de Leeuw, Nicole Scheffer, Hans den Dunnen, Johan T. Eur J Hum Genet Article The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) system for variant classification is score based with five classes: benign, likely benign, variant of unknown significance (VUS), likely pathogenic, and pathogenic. Here, we present a variant classification model that can be an add-on or alternative to ACMG classification: A stepwise system that can classify any type of genetic variant (e.g., hypomorphic alleles, imprinted alleles, copy number variants, runs of homozygosity, enhancer variants, and variants related to traits). We call it the ABC system because classification is first functional (A), then clinical (B), and optionally a standard comment that fits the clinical question is selected (C). Both steps A and B have 1–5 grading when knowledge is sufficient, if not, class “zero” is assigned. Functional grading (A) only concerns biological consequences with the stages normal function (1), likely normal function (2), hypothetical functional effect (3), likely functional effect (4), and proven functional effect (5). Clinical grading (B) is genotype–phenotype focused with the stages “right type of gene” (1), risk factor (2), and pathogenic (3–5, depending on penetrance). Both grades are listed for each variant and combined to generate a joint class ranging from A to F. Importantly, the A–F classes are linked to standard comments, reflecting laboratory or national policy. In step A, the VUS class is split into class 0 (true unknown) and class 3 (hypothetical functional effect based on molecular predictions or de novo occurrence), providing a rationale for variant-of-interest reporting when the clinical picture could fit the finding. The system gives clinicians a better guide to variant significance. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-13 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8821602/ /pubmed/33981013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00903-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Houge, Gunnar
Laner, Andreas
Cirak, Sebahattin
de Leeuw, Nicole
Scheffer, Hans
den Dunnen, Johan T.
Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant
title Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant
title_full Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant
title_fullStr Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant
title_full_unstemmed Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant
title_short Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant
title_sort stepwise abc system for classification of any type of genetic variant
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00903-z
work_keys_str_mv AT hougegunnar stepwiseabcsystemforclassificationofanytypeofgeneticvariant
AT lanerandreas stepwiseabcsystemforclassificationofanytypeofgeneticvariant
AT ciraksebahattin stepwiseabcsystemforclassificationofanytypeofgeneticvariant
AT deleeuwnicole stepwiseabcsystemforclassificationofanytypeofgeneticvariant
AT schefferhans stepwiseabcsystemforclassificationofanytypeofgeneticvariant
AT dendunnenjohant stepwiseabcsystemforclassificationofanytypeofgeneticvariant