Cargando…
Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant
The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) system for variant classification is score based with five classes: benign, likely benign, variant of unknown significance (VUS), likely pathogenic, and pathogenic. Here, we present a variant...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00903-z |
_version_ | 1784646434724773888 |
---|---|
author | Houge, Gunnar Laner, Andreas Cirak, Sebahattin de Leeuw, Nicole Scheffer, Hans den Dunnen, Johan T. |
author_facet | Houge, Gunnar Laner, Andreas Cirak, Sebahattin de Leeuw, Nicole Scheffer, Hans den Dunnen, Johan T. |
author_sort | Houge, Gunnar |
collection | PubMed |
description | The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) system for variant classification is score based with five classes: benign, likely benign, variant of unknown significance (VUS), likely pathogenic, and pathogenic. Here, we present a variant classification model that can be an add-on or alternative to ACMG classification: A stepwise system that can classify any type of genetic variant (e.g., hypomorphic alleles, imprinted alleles, copy number variants, runs of homozygosity, enhancer variants, and variants related to traits). We call it the ABC system because classification is first functional (A), then clinical (B), and optionally a standard comment that fits the clinical question is selected (C). Both steps A and B have 1–5 grading when knowledge is sufficient, if not, class “zero” is assigned. Functional grading (A) only concerns biological consequences with the stages normal function (1), likely normal function (2), hypothetical functional effect (3), likely functional effect (4), and proven functional effect (5). Clinical grading (B) is genotype–phenotype focused with the stages “right type of gene” (1), risk factor (2), and pathogenic (3–5, depending on penetrance). Both grades are listed for each variant and combined to generate a joint class ranging from A to F. Importantly, the A–F classes are linked to standard comments, reflecting laboratory or national policy. In step A, the VUS class is split into class 0 (true unknown) and class 3 (hypothetical functional effect based on molecular predictions or de novo occurrence), providing a rationale for variant-of-interest reporting when the clinical picture could fit the finding. The system gives clinicians a better guide to variant significance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8821602 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88216022022-02-17 Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant Houge, Gunnar Laner, Andreas Cirak, Sebahattin de Leeuw, Nicole Scheffer, Hans den Dunnen, Johan T. Eur J Hum Genet Article The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) system for variant classification is score based with five classes: benign, likely benign, variant of unknown significance (VUS), likely pathogenic, and pathogenic. Here, we present a variant classification model that can be an add-on or alternative to ACMG classification: A stepwise system that can classify any type of genetic variant (e.g., hypomorphic alleles, imprinted alleles, copy number variants, runs of homozygosity, enhancer variants, and variants related to traits). We call it the ABC system because classification is first functional (A), then clinical (B), and optionally a standard comment that fits the clinical question is selected (C). Both steps A and B have 1–5 grading when knowledge is sufficient, if not, class “zero” is assigned. Functional grading (A) only concerns biological consequences with the stages normal function (1), likely normal function (2), hypothetical functional effect (3), likely functional effect (4), and proven functional effect (5). Clinical grading (B) is genotype–phenotype focused with the stages “right type of gene” (1), risk factor (2), and pathogenic (3–5, depending on penetrance). Both grades are listed for each variant and combined to generate a joint class ranging from A to F. Importantly, the A–F classes are linked to standard comments, reflecting laboratory or national policy. In step A, the VUS class is split into class 0 (true unknown) and class 3 (hypothetical functional effect based on molecular predictions or de novo occurrence), providing a rationale for variant-of-interest reporting when the clinical picture could fit the finding. The system gives clinicians a better guide to variant significance. Springer International Publishing 2021-05-13 2022-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8821602/ /pubmed/33981013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00903-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Houge, Gunnar Laner, Andreas Cirak, Sebahattin de Leeuw, Nicole Scheffer, Hans den Dunnen, Johan T. Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant |
title | Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant |
title_full | Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant |
title_fullStr | Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant |
title_full_unstemmed | Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant |
title_short | Stepwise ABC system for classification of any type of genetic variant |
title_sort | stepwise abc system for classification of any type of genetic variant |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821602/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33981013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41431-021-00903-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hougegunnar stepwiseabcsystemforclassificationofanytypeofgeneticvariant AT lanerandreas stepwiseabcsystemforclassificationofanytypeofgeneticvariant AT ciraksebahattin stepwiseabcsystemforclassificationofanytypeofgeneticvariant AT deleeuwnicole stepwiseabcsystemforclassificationofanytypeofgeneticvariant AT schefferhans stepwiseabcsystemforclassificationofanytypeofgeneticvariant AT dendunnenjohant stepwiseabcsystemforclassificationofanytypeofgeneticvariant |