Cargando…
Mandatory vaccination and the ‘seat belt analogy’ argument: a critical analysis in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic
The seat belt analogy argument is aimed at furthering the success of coercive vaccination efforts on the basis that the latter is similar to compulsory use of seat belts. However, this article demonstrated that this argument does not work so well in practice due to several reasons. The possibility o...
Autor principal: | de Miguel Beriain, Iñigo |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35132507 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10068-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Vaccination, Risks, and Freedom: The Seat Belt Analogy
por: Giubilini, Alberto, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Vaccination = Seat Belt
por: Chung, Min Suk
Publicado: (2019) -
The ‘false hope’ argument in discussions on expanded access to investigational drugs: a critical assessment
por: Hordijk, Marjolijn, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Two cases of intestinal injuries due to seat belt without seat belt sign
por: Özçay, Necdet, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Informed decision making about predictive DNA tests: arguments for more public visibility of personal deliberations about the good life
por: Boenink, Marianne, et al.
Publicado: (2009)