Cargando…

Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice

Health care interventions are increasingly being delivered through digital technologies, offering major opportunities for delivering more health gains from scarce health care resources. Digital health interventions (DHIs) raise distinct challenges for economic evaluations compared with drugs and med...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomes, Manuel, Murray, Elizabeth, Raftery, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35132606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01130-0
_version_ 1784646482615336960
author Gomes, Manuel
Murray, Elizabeth
Raftery, James
author_facet Gomes, Manuel
Murray, Elizabeth
Raftery, James
author_sort Gomes, Manuel
collection PubMed
description Health care interventions are increasingly being delivered through digital technologies, offering major opportunities for delivering more health gains from scarce health care resources. Digital health interventions (DHIs) raise distinct challenges for economic evaluations compared with drugs and medical devices, not least due to their interacting, evolving features. The implications of the distinctive nature of DHIs for the methodological choices underpinning their economic evaluation is not well understood. This paper provides an in-depth discussion of distinct features of DHIs and how they might impact the design, measurement, analysis and reporting of cost-effectiveness analysis conducted alongside both randomised and non-randomised studies. These include aspects related to choice of comparator, costs and benefits assessment, study perspective and type of economic analysis. We argue that typical methodological standpoints, such as taking a health service perspective, focusing on health-related benefits and adopting cost-utility analyses, as typically adopted in the economic evaluation of non-digital technologies (pharmaceutical drugs and medical devices), are unlikely to be appropriate for DHIs. We illustrate how these methodological aspects can be appropriately addressed in an evaluation of a digitally supported, remote rehabilitation programme for patients with Long Covid in England. We highlight several methodological considerations for improving practice and areas where further methodological work is required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8821841
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88218412022-02-08 Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice Gomes, Manuel Murray, Elizabeth Raftery, James Pharmacoeconomics Practical Application Health care interventions are increasingly being delivered through digital technologies, offering major opportunities for delivering more health gains from scarce health care resources. Digital health interventions (DHIs) raise distinct challenges for economic evaluations compared with drugs and medical devices, not least due to their interacting, evolving features. The implications of the distinctive nature of DHIs for the methodological choices underpinning their economic evaluation is not well understood. This paper provides an in-depth discussion of distinct features of DHIs and how they might impact the design, measurement, analysis and reporting of cost-effectiveness analysis conducted alongside both randomised and non-randomised studies. These include aspects related to choice of comparator, costs and benefits assessment, study perspective and type of economic analysis. We argue that typical methodological standpoints, such as taking a health service perspective, focusing on health-related benefits and adopting cost-utility analyses, as typically adopted in the economic evaluation of non-digital technologies (pharmaceutical drugs and medical devices), are unlikely to be appropriate for DHIs. We illustrate how these methodological aspects can be appropriately addressed in an evaluation of a digitally supported, remote rehabilitation programme for patients with Long Covid in England. We highlight several methodological considerations for improving practice and areas where further methodological work is required. Springer International Publishing 2022-02-08 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8821841/ /pubmed/35132606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01130-0 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Practical Application
Gomes, Manuel
Murray, Elizabeth
Raftery, James
Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice
title Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice
title_full Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice
title_fullStr Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice
title_full_unstemmed Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice
title_short Economic Evaluation of Digital Health Interventions: Methodological Issues and Recommendations for Practice
title_sort economic evaluation of digital health interventions: methodological issues and recommendations for practice
topic Practical Application
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8821841/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35132606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-022-01130-0
work_keys_str_mv AT gomesmanuel economicevaluationofdigitalhealthinterventionsmethodologicalissuesandrecommendationsforpractice
AT murrayelizabeth economicevaluationofdigitalhealthinterventionsmethodologicalissuesandrecommendationsforpractice
AT rafteryjames economicevaluationofdigitalhealthinterventionsmethodologicalissuesandrecommendationsforpractice