Cargando…

A biomechanical study after combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligaments: Comparison between anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis using the modified Lemaire technique

OBJECTIVES: To determine the stabilizing role of the anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) and the modified Lemaire lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to determine if one of these two procedures was superio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delaloye, Jean-Romain, Hartog, christoph, Blatter, Samuel, Müller, Dominik, Schläppi, Michel, Denzler, Dario, Murar, Jozef, Koch, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822035/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00003
_version_ 1784646524314058752
author Delaloye, Jean-Romain
Hartog, christoph
Blatter, Samuel
Müller, Dominik
Schläppi, Michel
Denzler, Dario
Murar, Jozef
Koch, Peter
author_facet Delaloye, Jean-Romain
Hartog, christoph
Blatter, Samuel
Müller, Dominik
Schläppi, Michel
Denzler, Dario
Murar, Jozef
Koch, Peter
author_sort Delaloye, Jean-Romain
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To determine the stabilizing role of the anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) and the modified Lemaire lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to determine if one of these two procedures was superior to the other. METHODS: Six non paired cadaveric knees were tested with a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system (KUKA Robotics). Internal rotation and anterior tibial translation were measured between 0 and 90° knee flexion after applying 5 N-m Torque and a 134-N anterior load, respectively. A full kinematics assessment was performed in each following conditions: intact knee, after section of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), after section of the ACL and anterolateral ligament (ALL) and Kaplan fibers, after isolated ACLR, after combined ACLR+LET and ACLR+ALLR. ALLR was performed using Gracilis tendon while central strip of the ilio-tibial band was used for the modified Lemaire procedure. These different states were compared using a Tukey paired comparison test. RESULTS: In combined ACL and anterolateral deficient knee, anterior translation and internal rotation remained significantly increased after isolated ACLR compared to intact knee (+2.33 ± 1.44 mm and +1.98 ± 1.06°; p > 0.01). On the other hand, the addition of an ALLR or a modified Lemaire LET to the ACLR allowed to restore anterior translation and internal rotation to values similar to the intact knee. Finally, the two anterolateral procedures had not significantly different values in both tests. This difference was 0.67 ± 1.46 mm for anterior translation (p=0.79) and 0.11 ± 1.11° for internal rotation (p=0.99). CONCLUSION: In ACL and anterolateral deficient knee, combined ACLR and anterolateral reconstruction allowed restoration of native stability of the knee in anterior translation and internal rotation contrary to isolated ACLR. Additionally, both types of extra-articular reconstruction, ALLR or modified Lemaire procedure, were similar in terms of restoring knee kinematics and neither overconstrained the knee.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8822035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88220352022-02-18 A biomechanical study after combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligaments: Comparison between anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis using the modified Lemaire technique Delaloye, Jean-Romain Hartog, christoph Blatter, Samuel Müller, Dominik Schläppi, Michel Denzler, Dario Murar, Jozef Koch, Peter Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: To determine the stabilizing role of the anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) and the modified Lemaire lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) performed in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and to determine if one of these two procedures was superior to the other. METHODS: Six non paired cadaveric knees were tested with a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system (KUKA Robotics). Internal rotation and anterior tibial translation were measured between 0 and 90° knee flexion after applying 5 N-m Torque and a 134-N anterior load, respectively. A full kinematics assessment was performed in each following conditions: intact knee, after section of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), after section of the ACL and anterolateral ligament (ALL) and Kaplan fibers, after isolated ACLR, after combined ACLR+LET and ACLR+ALLR. ALLR was performed using Gracilis tendon while central strip of the ilio-tibial band was used for the modified Lemaire procedure. These different states were compared using a Tukey paired comparison test. RESULTS: In combined ACL and anterolateral deficient knee, anterior translation and internal rotation remained significantly increased after isolated ACLR compared to intact knee (+2.33 ± 1.44 mm and +1.98 ± 1.06°; p > 0.01). On the other hand, the addition of an ALLR or a modified Lemaire LET to the ACLR allowed to restore anterior translation and internal rotation to values similar to the intact knee. Finally, the two anterolateral procedures had not significantly different values in both tests. This difference was 0.67 ± 1.46 mm for anterior translation (p=0.79) and 0.11 ± 1.11° for internal rotation (p=0.99). CONCLUSION: In ACL and anterolateral deficient knee, combined ACLR and anterolateral reconstruction allowed restoration of native stability of the knee in anterior translation and internal rotation contrary to isolated ACLR. Additionally, both types of extra-articular reconstruction, ALLR or modified Lemaire procedure, were similar in terms of restoring knee kinematics and neither overconstrained the knee. SAGE Publications 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8822035/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00003 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For article reuse guidelines, please visit SAGE’s website at http://www.sagepub.com/journals-permissions.
spellingShingle Article
Delaloye, Jean-Romain
Hartog, christoph
Blatter, Samuel
Müller, Dominik
Schläppi, Michel
Denzler, Dario
Murar, Jozef
Koch, Peter
A biomechanical study after combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligaments: Comparison between anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis using the modified Lemaire technique
title A biomechanical study after combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligaments: Comparison between anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis using the modified Lemaire technique
title_full A biomechanical study after combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligaments: Comparison between anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis using the modified Lemaire technique
title_fullStr A biomechanical study after combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligaments: Comparison between anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis using the modified Lemaire technique
title_full_unstemmed A biomechanical study after combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligaments: Comparison between anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis using the modified Lemaire technique
title_short A biomechanical study after combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligaments: Comparison between anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis using the modified Lemaire technique
title_sort biomechanical study after combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and anterolateral ligaments: comparison between anatomic anterolateral ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis using the modified lemaire technique
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822035/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00003
work_keys_str_mv AT delaloyejeanromain abiomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT hartogchristoph abiomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT blattersamuel abiomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT mullerdominik abiomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT schlappimichel abiomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT denzlerdario abiomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT murarjozef abiomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT kochpeter abiomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT delaloyejeanromain biomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT hartogchristoph biomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT blattersamuel biomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT mullerdominik biomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT schlappimichel biomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT denzlerdario biomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT murarjozef biomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique
AT kochpeter biomechanicalstudyaftercombinedreconstructionoftheanteriorcruciateandanterolateralligamentscomparisonbetweenanatomicanterolateralligamentreconstructionandlateraltenodesisusingthemodifiedlemairetechnique