Cargando…
Inconsistencies in the MRI Evaluation of Supraspinatus Volume After Repair
BACKGROUND: Reversibility of rotator cuff atrophy after surgical repair is controversial. Traditionally, the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the rotator cuff was measured in conventional Y-view (CYV) via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate reversibility. However, it has been suggested that sc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35146023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120930660 |
_version_ | 1784646534366756864 |
---|---|
author | Jang, Young Hoon Suh, Bo-Kyung Jeong, Hyunseok Kwon, Oh Hyo Kim, Sae Hoon |
author_facet | Jang, Young Hoon Suh, Bo-Kyung Jeong, Hyunseok Kwon, Oh Hyo Kim, Sae Hoon |
author_sort | Jang, Young Hoon |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reversibility of rotator cuff atrophy after surgical repair is controversial. Traditionally, the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the rotator cuff was measured in conventional Y-view (CYV) via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate reversibility. However, it has been suggested that scanning axis inconsistency in CYV was overlooked and that the CSA in CYV reflects not only atrophy but also rotator cuff retraction. HYPOTHESIS: Discrepancies between scanning axes in CYV cause significant errors when one is evaluating changes in the CSA of the supraspinatus (SS) using preoperative and postoperative MRI scans. A more medial section than the Y-view is not influenced as much by retraction recovery after repair. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The study included 36 patients with full-thickness SS tear and retraction who underwent arthroscopic complete repair with preoperative MRI and immediate postoperative MRI (within 5 days after rotator cuff repair). Angles between CYV planes in the preoperative and immediate postoperative MRI scans were measured. MRI scans were reconstructed perpendicular to the scapular axes by multiplanar reconstruction. Differences between the CSAs of the SS in preoperative and postoperative Y-view on the original and reconstructed MRI scans were compared, and changes in CSAs of the SS muscles after repair in 2 sections medial to the reconstructed Y-view (RYV) were compared. RESULTS: The mean angle between CYV planes in preoperative and postoperative MRI scans was 13.1° ± 7.1°. Mean pre- to postoperative increase in the CSA of the SS was greater in CYV than in RYV (95 ± 72 vs 75 ± 62 mm(2); P = .024). Furthermore, pre- to postoperative CSA differences in the 2 medial sections were less than in RYV. For the most medial section, crossing the omohyoid origin, the CSA differences were not significant (434 ± 98 vs 448 ± 98 mm(2); P = .061). CONCLUSION: Scanning axes inconsistencies in CYV cause unacceptable errors in CSA measurements of the SS after repair. We recommend reconstruction along a consistent axis by multiplanar reconstruction when evaluating postoperative changes in SS atrophy and the use of sections more medial than the scapular Y-view to reduce errors caused by tendon retraction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8822071 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88220712022-02-09 Inconsistencies in the MRI Evaluation of Supraspinatus Volume After Repair Jang, Young Hoon Suh, Bo-Kyung Jeong, Hyunseok Kwon, Oh Hyo Kim, Sae Hoon Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Reversibility of rotator cuff atrophy after surgical repair is controversial. Traditionally, the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the rotator cuff was measured in conventional Y-view (CYV) via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate reversibility. However, it has been suggested that scanning axis inconsistency in CYV was overlooked and that the CSA in CYV reflects not only atrophy but also rotator cuff retraction. HYPOTHESIS: Discrepancies between scanning axes in CYV cause significant errors when one is evaluating changes in the CSA of the supraspinatus (SS) using preoperative and postoperative MRI scans. A more medial section than the Y-view is not influenced as much by retraction recovery after repair. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: The study included 36 patients with full-thickness SS tear and retraction who underwent arthroscopic complete repair with preoperative MRI and immediate postoperative MRI (within 5 days after rotator cuff repair). Angles between CYV planes in the preoperative and immediate postoperative MRI scans were measured. MRI scans were reconstructed perpendicular to the scapular axes by multiplanar reconstruction. Differences between the CSAs of the SS in preoperative and postoperative Y-view on the original and reconstructed MRI scans were compared, and changes in CSAs of the SS muscles after repair in 2 sections medial to the reconstructed Y-view (RYV) were compared. RESULTS: The mean angle between CYV planes in preoperative and postoperative MRI scans was 13.1° ± 7.1°. Mean pre- to postoperative increase in the CSA of the SS was greater in CYV than in RYV (95 ± 72 vs 75 ± 62 mm(2); P = .024). Furthermore, pre- to postoperative CSA differences in the 2 medial sections were less than in RYV. For the most medial section, crossing the omohyoid origin, the CSA differences were not significant (434 ± 98 vs 448 ± 98 mm(2); P = .061). CONCLUSION: Scanning axes inconsistencies in CYV cause unacceptable errors in CSA measurements of the SS after repair. We recommend reconstruction along a consistent axis by multiplanar reconstruction when evaluating postoperative changes in SS atrophy and the use of sections more medial than the scapular Y-view to reduce errors caused by tendon retraction. SAGE Publications 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8822071/ /pubmed/35146023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120930660 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Jang, Young Hoon Suh, Bo-Kyung Jeong, Hyunseok Kwon, Oh Hyo Kim, Sae Hoon Inconsistencies in the MRI Evaluation of Supraspinatus Volume After Repair |
title | Inconsistencies in the MRI Evaluation of Supraspinatus Volume After
Repair |
title_full | Inconsistencies in the MRI Evaluation of Supraspinatus Volume After
Repair |
title_fullStr | Inconsistencies in the MRI Evaluation of Supraspinatus Volume After
Repair |
title_full_unstemmed | Inconsistencies in the MRI Evaluation of Supraspinatus Volume After
Repair |
title_short | Inconsistencies in the MRI Evaluation of Supraspinatus Volume After
Repair |
title_sort | inconsistencies in the mri evaluation of supraspinatus volume after
repair |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822071/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35146023 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120930660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jangyounghoon inconsistenciesinthemrievaluationofsupraspinatusvolumeafterrepair AT suhbokyung inconsistenciesinthemrievaluationofsupraspinatusvolumeafterrepair AT jeonghyunseok inconsistenciesinthemrievaluationofsupraspinatusvolumeafterrepair AT kwonohhyo inconsistenciesinthemrievaluationofsupraspinatusvolumeafterrepair AT kimsaehoon inconsistenciesinthemrievaluationofsupraspinatusvolumeafterrepair |