Cargando…

Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol

Background: The living systematic review (LSR) approach is based on an ongoing surveillance of the literature and continual updating. A few guidance documents address the conduct, reporting, publishing and appraisal of systematic reviews (SRs), but the methodology described is either not up-to date...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iannizzi, Claire, Akl, Elie A, Kahale, Lara A, Dorando, Elena, Mosunmola Aminat, Abina, Barker, James M, McKenzie, Joanne E., Haddaway, Neal R, Piechotta, Vanessa, Skoetz, Nicole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186269
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.55108.1
_version_ 1784646549641363456
author Iannizzi, Claire
Akl, Elie A
Kahale, Lara A
Dorando, Elena
Mosunmola Aminat, Abina
Barker, James M
McKenzie, Joanne E.
Haddaway, Neal R
Piechotta, Vanessa
Skoetz, Nicole
author_facet Iannizzi, Claire
Akl, Elie A
Kahale, Lara A
Dorando, Elena
Mosunmola Aminat, Abina
Barker, James M
McKenzie, Joanne E.
Haddaway, Neal R
Piechotta, Vanessa
Skoetz, Nicole
author_sort Iannizzi, Claire
collection PubMed
description Background: The living systematic review (LSR) approach is based on an ongoing surveillance of the literature and continual updating. A few guidance documents address the conduct, reporting, publishing and appraisal of systematic reviews (SRs), but the methodology described is either not up-to date or not suitable for LSRs and misses additional LSR-specific considerations. The objective of this scoping review is to systematically collate methodological literature and guidance on how to conduct, report, publish and appraise the quality of LSRs. The scoping review will allow the mapping of the existing evidence on the topic to support LSRs authors seeking guidance and identify related gaps.  Methods: To achieve our objectives, we will conduct a scoping review to survey and evaluate existing evidence, using the standard scoping review methodology. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane using the OVID interface. The search strategy was developed by a researcher experienced in developing literature search strategies with the help of an information specialist. As for searching grey literature, we will seek existing guidelines and handbooks on LSRs from organizations that conduct evidence syntheses using the Lens.org website. Two review authors will extract and catalogue the study data on LSR methodological aspects into a standardized and pilot-tested data extraction form. The main categories will reflect proposed methods for (i) conducting LSRs, (ii) reporting of LSRs, (iii) publishing and (iv) appraising the quality of LSRs. Data synthesis and conclusion: By collecting these data from methodological surveys and papers, as well as existing guidance documents and handbooks on LSRs, we might identify specific issues and components lacking within current LSR methodology. Thus, the systematically obtained findings of the scoping review could be used as basis for the revision of existing methods tools on LSR, for instance a PRISMA statement extension for LSRs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8822136
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88221362022-02-17 Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol Iannizzi, Claire Akl, Elie A Kahale, Lara A Dorando, Elena Mosunmola Aminat, Abina Barker, James M McKenzie, Joanne E. Haddaway, Neal R Piechotta, Vanessa Skoetz, Nicole F1000Res Study Protocol Background: The living systematic review (LSR) approach is based on an ongoing surveillance of the literature and continual updating. A few guidance documents address the conduct, reporting, publishing and appraisal of systematic reviews (SRs), but the methodology described is either not up-to date or not suitable for LSRs and misses additional LSR-specific considerations. The objective of this scoping review is to systematically collate methodological literature and guidance on how to conduct, report, publish and appraise the quality of LSRs. The scoping review will allow the mapping of the existing evidence on the topic to support LSRs authors seeking guidance and identify related gaps.  Methods: To achieve our objectives, we will conduct a scoping review to survey and evaluate existing evidence, using the standard scoping review methodology. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane using the OVID interface. The search strategy was developed by a researcher experienced in developing literature search strategies with the help of an information specialist. As for searching grey literature, we will seek existing guidelines and handbooks on LSRs from organizations that conduct evidence syntheses using the Lens.org website. Two review authors will extract and catalogue the study data on LSR methodological aspects into a standardized and pilot-tested data extraction form. The main categories will reflect proposed methods for (i) conducting LSRs, (ii) reporting of LSRs, (iii) publishing and (iv) appraising the quality of LSRs. Data synthesis and conclusion: By collecting these data from methodological surveys and papers, as well as existing guidance documents and handbooks on LSRs, we might identify specific issues and components lacking within current LSR methodology. Thus, the systematically obtained findings of the scoping review could be used as basis for the revision of existing methods tools on LSR, for instance a PRISMA statement extension for LSRs. F1000 Research Limited 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8822136/ /pubmed/35186269 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.55108.1 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Iannizzi C et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Iannizzi, Claire
Akl, Elie A
Kahale, Lara A
Dorando, Elena
Mosunmola Aminat, Abina
Barker, James M
McKenzie, Joanne E.
Haddaway, Neal R
Piechotta, Vanessa
Skoetz, Nicole
Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol
title Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol
title_full Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol
title_fullStr Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol
title_full_unstemmed Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol
title_short Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol
title_sort methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822136/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35186269
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.55108.1
work_keys_str_mv AT iannizziclaire methodsandguidanceonconductingreportingpublishingandappraisinglivingsystematicreviewsascopingreviewprotocol
AT akleliea methodsandguidanceonconductingreportingpublishingandappraisinglivingsystematicreviewsascopingreviewprotocol
AT kahalelaraa methodsandguidanceonconductingreportingpublishingandappraisinglivingsystematicreviewsascopingreviewprotocol
AT dorandoelena methodsandguidanceonconductingreportingpublishingandappraisinglivingsystematicreviewsascopingreviewprotocol
AT mosunmolaaminatabina methodsandguidanceonconductingreportingpublishingandappraisinglivingsystematicreviewsascopingreviewprotocol
AT barkerjamesm methodsandguidanceonconductingreportingpublishingandappraisinglivingsystematicreviewsascopingreviewprotocol
AT mckenziejoannee methodsandguidanceonconductingreportingpublishingandappraisinglivingsystematicreviewsascopingreviewprotocol
AT haddawaynealr methodsandguidanceonconductingreportingpublishingandappraisinglivingsystematicreviewsascopingreviewprotocol
AT piechottavanessa methodsandguidanceonconductingreportingpublishingandappraisinglivingsystematicreviewsascopingreviewprotocol
AT skoetznicole methodsandguidanceonconductingreportingpublishingandappraisinglivingsystematicreviewsascopingreviewprotocol