Cargando…
An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus
Against the background of the growing burden associated with diabetes mellitus, the German Federal Ministry of Health commissioned the Robert Koch Institute to develop a national diabetes surveillance. The periodic publication of up-to-date data needed by diverse target audiences (dissemination) to...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Robert Koch Institute
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35146248 http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/5989 |
_version_ | 1784646571792531456 |
---|---|
author | Reitzle, Lukas Schmidt, Christian Scheidt-Nave, Christa Ziese, Thomas |
author_facet | Reitzle, Lukas Schmidt, Christian Scheidt-Nave, Christa Ziese, Thomas |
author_sort | Reitzle, Lukas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Against the background of the growing burden associated with diabetes mellitus, the German Federal Ministry of Health commissioned the Robert Koch Institute to develop a national diabetes surveillance. The periodic publication of up-to-date data needed by diverse target audiences (dissemination) to develop subsequent public health measures is a crucial aspect of disease surveillance. The study produced an overview of diabetes surveillance in various countries with the intention of developing a dissemination strategy. This involved a two-stage process beginning with an online survey of public health experts from 46 countries. Structured Internet research was then carried out for countries that did not provide a response (19 out of 46). The majority of countries (38 out of 46; 83%) include diabetes in their health reporting; three quarters (29 out of 38; 77%) of these countries rely on an indicator-based reporting system. The study found that the most common formats used to publish information about diabetes and other noncommunicable diseases were topic-specific reports (24 out of 36; 67%) and national health reports (23 out of 36; 64%), followed by online formats such as websites or databases (20 out of 36; 57%). Moreover, health reporting primarily targets politicians (19 out of 20; 95%) as well as the media and the press (16 out of 20; 80%). The study found that both printed and online publications form part of a comprehensive dissemination strategy, however address different audiences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8822247 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Robert Koch Institute |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88222472022-02-09 An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus Reitzle, Lukas Schmidt, Christian Scheidt-Nave, Christa Ziese, Thomas J Health Monit Concepts & Methods Against the background of the growing burden associated with diabetes mellitus, the German Federal Ministry of Health commissioned the Robert Koch Institute to develop a national diabetes surveillance. The periodic publication of up-to-date data needed by diverse target audiences (dissemination) to develop subsequent public health measures is a crucial aspect of disease surveillance. The study produced an overview of diabetes surveillance in various countries with the intention of developing a dissemination strategy. This involved a two-stage process beginning with an online survey of public health experts from 46 countries. Structured Internet research was then carried out for countries that did not provide a response (19 out of 46). The majority of countries (38 out of 46; 83%) include diabetes in their health reporting; three quarters (29 out of 38; 77%) of these countries rely on an indicator-based reporting system. The study found that the most common formats used to publish information about diabetes and other noncommunicable diseases were topic-specific reports (24 out of 36; 67%) and national health reports (23 out of 36; 64%), followed by online formats such as websites or databases (20 out of 36; 57%). Moreover, health reporting primarily targets politicians (19 out of 20; 95%) as well as the media and the press (16 out of 20; 80%). The study found that both printed and online publications form part of a comprehensive dissemination strategy, however address different audiences. Robert Koch Institute 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8822247/ /pubmed/35146248 http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/5989 Text en © Robert Koch Institute. All rights reserved unless explicitly granted. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Concepts & Methods Reitzle, Lukas Schmidt, Christian Scheidt-Nave, Christa Ziese, Thomas An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus |
title | An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus |
title_full | An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus |
title_fullStr | An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus |
title_full_unstemmed | An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus |
title_short | An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus |
title_sort | international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus |
topic | Concepts & Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822247/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35146248 http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/5989 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reitzlelukas aninternationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus AT schmidtchristian aninternationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus AT scheidtnavechrista aninternationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus AT ziesethomas aninternationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus AT reitzlelukas internationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus AT schmidtchristian internationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus AT scheidtnavechrista internationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus AT ziesethomas internationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus |