Cargando…

An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus

Against the background of the growing burden associated with diabetes mellitus, the German Federal Ministry of Health commissioned the Robert Koch Institute to develop a national diabetes surveillance. The periodic publication of up-to-date data needed by diverse target audiences (dissemination) to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reitzle, Lukas, Schmidt, Christian, Scheidt-Nave, Christa, Ziese, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Robert Koch Institute 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35146248
http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/5989
_version_ 1784646571792531456
author Reitzle, Lukas
Schmidt, Christian
Scheidt-Nave, Christa
Ziese, Thomas
author_facet Reitzle, Lukas
Schmidt, Christian
Scheidt-Nave, Christa
Ziese, Thomas
author_sort Reitzle, Lukas
collection PubMed
description Against the background of the growing burden associated with diabetes mellitus, the German Federal Ministry of Health commissioned the Robert Koch Institute to develop a national diabetes surveillance. The periodic publication of up-to-date data needed by diverse target audiences (dissemination) to develop subsequent public health measures is a crucial aspect of disease surveillance. The study produced an overview of diabetes surveillance in various countries with the intention of developing a dissemination strategy. This involved a two-stage process beginning with an online survey of public health experts from 46 countries. Structured Internet research was then carried out for countries that did not provide a response (19 out of 46). The majority of countries (38 out of 46; 83%) include diabetes in their health reporting; three quarters (29 out of 38; 77%) of these countries rely on an indicator-based reporting system. The study found that the most common formats used to publish information about diabetes and other noncommunicable diseases were topic-specific reports (24 out of 36; 67%) and national health reports (23 out of 36; 64%), followed by online formats such as websites or databases (20 out of 36; 57%). Moreover, health reporting primarily targets politicians (19 out of 20; 95%) as well as the media and the press (16 out of 20; 80%). The study found that both printed and online publications form part of a comprehensive dissemination strategy, however address different audiences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8822247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Robert Koch Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88222472022-02-09 An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus Reitzle, Lukas Schmidt, Christian Scheidt-Nave, Christa Ziese, Thomas J Health Monit Concepts & Methods Against the background of the growing burden associated with diabetes mellitus, the German Federal Ministry of Health commissioned the Robert Koch Institute to develop a national diabetes surveillance. The periodic publication of up-to-date data needed by diverse target audiences (dissemination) to develop subsequent public health measures is a crucial aspect of disease surveillance. The study produced an overview of diabetes surveillance in various countries with the intention of developing a dissemination strategy. This involved a two-stage process beginning with an online survey of public health experts from 46 countries. Structured Internet research was then carried out for countries that did not provide a response (19 out of 46). The majority of countries (38 out of 46; 83%) include diabetes in their health reporting; three quarters (29 out of 38; 77%) of these countries rely on an indicator-based reporting system. The study found that the most common formats used to publish information about diabetes and other noncommunicable diseases were topic-specific reports (24 out of 36; 67%) and national health reports (23 out of 36; 64%), followed by online formats such as websites or databases (20 out of 36; 57%). Moreover, health reporting primarily targets politicians (19 out of 20; 95%) as well as the media and the press (16 out of 20; 80%). The study found that both printed and online publications form part of a comprehensive dissemination strategy, however address different audiences. Robert Koch Institute 2019-06-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8822247/ /pubmed/35146248 http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/5989 Text en © Robert Koch Institute. All rights reserved unless explicitly granted. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Concepts & Methods
Reitzle, Lukas
Schmidt, Christian
Scheidt-Nave, Christa
Ziese, Thomas
An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus
title An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus
title_full An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus
title_fullStr An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus
title_full_unstemmed An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus
title_short An international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus
title_sort international comparison of noncommunicable disease reporting: the case of diabetes mellitus
topic Concepts & Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35146248
http://dx.doi.org/10.25646/5989
work_keys_str_mv AT reitzlelukas aninternationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus
AT schmidtchristian aninternationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus
AT scheidtnavechrista aninternationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus
AT ziesethomas aninternationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus
AT reitzlelukas internationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus
AT schmidtchristian internationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus
AT scheidtnavechrista internationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus
AT ziesethomas internationalcomparisonofnoncommunicablediseasereportingthecaseofdiabetesmellitus