Cargando…

Understanding the ethical and legal considerations of Digital Pathology

Digital Pathology (DP) is a platform which has the potential to develop a truly integrated and global pathology community. The generation of DP data at scale creates novel challenges for the histopathology community in managing, processing, and governing the use of these data. The current understand...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coulter, Cheryl, McKay, Francis, Hallowell, Nina, Browning, Lisa, Colling, Richard, Macklin, Philip, Sorell, Tom, Aslam, Muhammad, Bryson, Gareth, Treanor, Darren, Verrill, Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.251
_version_ 1784646598241812480
author Coulter, Cheryl
McKay, Francis
Hallowell, Nina
Browning, Lisa
Colling, Richard
Macklin, Philip
Sorell, Tom
Aslam, Muhammad
Bryson, Gareth
Treanor, Darren
Verrill, Clare
author_facet Coulter, Cheryl
McKay, Francis
Hallowell, Nina
Browning, Lisa
Colling, Richard
Macklin, Philip
Sorell, Tom
Aslam, Muhammad
Bryson, Gareth
Treanor, Darren
Verrill, Clare
author_sort Coulter, Cheryl
collection PubMed
description Digital Pathology (DP) is a platform which has the potential to develop a truly integrated and global pathology community. The generation of DP data at scale creates novel challenges for the histopathology community in managing, processing, and governing the use of these data. The current understanding of, and confidence in, the legal and ethical aspects of DP by pathologists is unknown. We developed an electronic survey (e‐survey), comprising 22 questions, with input from the Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) Digital Pathology Working Group. The e‐survey was circulated via e‐mail and social media (Twitter) through the RCPath Digital Pathology Working Group network, RCPath Trainee Committee network, the Pathology image data Lake for Analytics, Knowledge and Education (PathLAKE) digital pathology consortium, National Pathology Imaging Co‐operative (NPIC), local contacts, and to the membership of both The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and the British Division of the International Academy of Pathology (BDIAP). Between 14 July 2020 and 6 September 2020, we collected 198 responses representing a cross section of histopathologists, including individuals with experience of DP research. We ascertained that, in the UK, DP is being used for diagnosis, research, and teaching, and that the platform is enabling data sharing. Our survey demonstrated that there is often a lack of confidence and understanding of the key issues of consent, legislation, and ethical guidelines. Of 198 respondents, 82 (41%) did not know when the use of digital scanned slide images would fall under the relevant legislation and 93 (47%) were ‘Not confident at all’ in their interpretation of consent for scanned slide images in research. With increasing uptake of DP, a working knowledge of these areas is essential but histopathologists often express a lack of confidence in these topics. The need for specific training in these areas is highlighted by the findings of this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8822384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88223842022-02-11 Understanding the ethical and legal considerations of Digital Pathology Coulter, Cheryl McKay, Francis Hallowell, Nina Browning, Lisa Colling, Richard Macklin, Philip Sorell, Tom Aslam, Muhammad Bryson, Gareth Treanor, Darren Verrill, Clare J Pathol Clin Res Original Articles Digital Pathology (DP) is a platform which has the potential to develop a truly integrated and global pathology community. The generation of DP data at scale creates novel challenges for the histopathology community in managing, processing, and governing the use of these data. The current understanding of, and confidence in, the legal and ethical aspects of DP by pathologists is unknown. We developed an electronic survey (e‐survey), comprising 22 questions, with input from the Royal College of Pathologists (RCPath) Digital Pathology Working Group. The e‐survey was circulated via e‐mail and social media (Twitter) through the RCPath Digital Pathology Working Group network, RCPath Trainee Committee network, the Pathology image data Lake for Analytics, Knowledge and Education (PathLAKE) digital pathology consortium, National Pathology Imaging Co‐operative (NPIC), local contacts, and to the membership of both The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and the British Division of the International Academy of Pathology (BDIAP). Between 14 July 2020 and 6 September 2020, we collected 198 responses representing a cross section of histopathologists, including individuals with experience of DP research. We ascertained that, in the UK, DP is being used for diagnosis, research, and teaching, and that the platform is enabling data sharing. Our survey demonstrated that there is often a lack of confidence and understanding of the key issues of consent, legislation, and ethical guidelines. Of 198 respondents, 82 (41%) did not know when the use of digital scanned slide images would fall under the relevant legislation and 93 (47%) were ‘Not confident at all’ in their interpretation of consent for scanned slide images in research. With increasing uptake of DP, a working knowledge of these areas is essential but histopathologists often express a lack of confidence in these topics. The need for specific training in these areas is highlighted by the findings of this study. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8822384/ /pubmed/34796679 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.251 Text en © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research published by The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Coulter, Cheryl
McKay, Francis
Hallowell, Nina
Browning, Lisa
Colling, Richard
Macklin, Philip
Sorell, Tom
Aslam, Muhammad
Bryson, Gareth
Treanor, Darren
Verrill, Clare
Understanding the ethical and legal considerations of Digital Pathology
title Understanding the ethical and legal considerations of Digital Pathology
title_full Understanding the ethical and legal considerations of Digital Pathology
title_fullStr Understanding the ethical and legal considerations of Digital Pathology
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the ethical and legal considerations of Digital Pathology
title_short Understanding the ethical and legal considerations of Digital Pathology
title_sort understanding the ethical and legal considerations of digital pathology
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34796679
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjp2.251
work_keys_str_mv AT coultercheryl understandingtheethicalandlegalconsiderationsofdigitalpathology
AT mckayfrancis understandingtheethicalandlegalconsiderationsofdigitalpathology
AT hallowellnina understandingtheethicalandlegalconsiderationsofdigitalpathology
AT browninglisa understandingtheethicalandlegalconsiderationsofdigitalpathology
AT collingrichard understandingtheethicalandlegalconsiderationsofdigitalpathology
AT macklinphilip understandingtheethicalandlegalconsiderationsofdigitalpathology
AT sorelltom understandingtheethicalandlegalconsiderationsofdigitalpathology
AT aslammuhammad understandingtheethicalandlegalconsiderationsofdigitalpathology
AT brysongareth understandingtheethicalandlegalconsiderationsofdigitalpathology
AT treanordarren understandingtheethicalandlegalconsiderationsofdigitalpathology
AT verrillclare understandingtheethicalandlegalconsiderationsofdigitalpathology