Cargando…
Short-term prediction of secondary progression in a sliding window: A test of a predicting algorithm in a validation cohort
INTRODUCTION: The Multiple Sclerosis Prediction Score (MSPS, www.msprediction.com) estimates, for any month during the course of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), the individual risk of transition to secondary progression (SP) during the following year. OBJECTIVE: Internal verification of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35145727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217319875466 |
_version_ | 1784646609447944192 |
---|---|
author | Skoog, B Link, J Tedeholm, H Longfils, M Nerman, O Fagius, J Andersen, O |
author_facet | Skoog, B Link, J Tedeholm, H Longfils, M Nerman, O Fagius, J Andersen, O |
author_sort | Skoog, B |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The Multiple Sclerosis Prediction Score (MSPS, www.msprediction.com) estimates, for any month during the course of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), the individual risk of transition to secondary progression (SP) during the following year. OBJECTIVE: Internal verification of the MSPS algorithm in a derivation cohort, the Gothenburg Incidence Cohort (GIC, n = 144) and external verification in the Uppsala MS cohort (UMS, n = 145). METHODS: Starting from their second relapse, patients were included and followed for 25 years. A matrix of MSPS values was created. From this matrix, a goodness-of-fit test and suitable diagnostic plots were derived to compare MSPS-calculated and observed outcomes (i.e. transition to SP). RESULTS: The median time to SP was slightly longer in the UMS than in the GIC, 15 vs. 11.5 years (p = 0.19). The MSPS was calibrated with multiplicative factors: 0.599 for the UMS and 0.829 for the GIC; the calibrated MSPS provided a good fit between expected and observed outcomes (chi-square p = 0.61 for the UMS), which indicated the model was not rejected. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the MSPS has clinically relevant generalizability in new cohorts, provided that the MSPS was calibrated to the actual overall SP incidence in the cohort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8822449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88224492022-02-09 Short-term prediction of secondary progression in a sliding window: A test of a predicting algorithm in a validation cohort Skoog, B Link, J Tedeholm, H Longfils, M Nerman, O Fagius, J Andersen, O Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin Original Research Paper INTRODUCTION: The Multiple Sclerosis Prediction Score (MSPS, www.msprediction.com) estimates, for any month during the course of relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), the individual risk of transition to secondary progression (SP) during the following year. OBJECTIVE: Internal verification of the MSPS algorithm in a derivation cohort, the Gothenburg Incidence Cohort (GIC, n = 144) and external verification in the Uppsala MS cohort (UMS, n = 145). METHODS: Starting from their second relapse, patients were included and followed for 25 years. A matrix of MSPS values was created. From this matrix, a goodness-of-fit test and suitable diagnostic plots were derived to compare MSPS-calculated and observed outcomes (i.e. transition to SP). RESULTS: The median time to SP was slightly longer in the UMS than in the GIC, 15 vs. 11.5 years (p = 0.19). The MSPS was calibrated with multiplicative factors: 0.599 for the UMS and 0.829 for the GIC; the calibrated MSPS provided a good fit between expected and observed outcomes (chi-square p = 0.61 for the UMS), which indicated the model was not rejected. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the MSPS has clinically relevant generalizability in new cohorts, provided that the MSPS was calibrated to the actual overall SP incidence in the cohort. SAGE Publications 2019-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8822449/ /pubmed/35145727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217319875466 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Paper Skoog, B Link, J Tedeholm, H Longfils, M Nerman, O Fagius, J Andersen, O Short-term prediction of secondary progression in a sliding window: A test of a predicting algorithm in a validation cohort |
title | Short-term prediction of secondary progression in a sliding window: A test of a predicting algorithm in a validation cohort |
title_full | Short-term prediction of secondary progression in a sliding window: A test of a predicting algorithm in a validation cohort |
title_fullStr | Short-term prediction of secondary progression in a sliding window: A test of a predicting algorithm in a validation cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Short-term prediction of secondary progression in a sliding window: A test of a predicting algorithm in a validation cohort |
title_short | Short-term prediction of secondary progression in a sliding window: A test of a predicting algorithm in a validation cohort |
title_sort | short-term prediction of secondary progression in a sliding window: a test of a predicting algorithm in a validation cohort |
topic | Original Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35145727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2055217319875466 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skoogb shorttermpredictionofsecondaryprogressioninaslidingwindowatestofapredictingalgorithminavalidationcohort AT linkj shorttermpredictionofsecondaryprogressioninaslidingwindowatestofapredictingalgorithminavalidationcohort AT tedeholmh shorttermpredictionofsecondaryprogressioninaslidingwindowatestofapredictingalgorithminavalidationcohort AT longfilsm shorttermpredictionofsecondaryprogressioninaslidingwindowatestofapredictingalgorithminavalidationcohort AT nermano shorttermpredictionofsecondaryprogressioninaslidingwindowatestofapredictingalgorithminavalidationcohort AT fagiusj shorttermpredictionofsecondaryprogressioninaslidingwindowatestofapredictingalgorithminavalidationcohort AT anderseno shorttermpredictionofsecondaryprogressioninaslidingwindowatestofapredictingalgorithminavalidationcohort |