Cargando…

Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution

BACKGROUND: The full catalog of satellite DNA (satDNA) within a same genome constitutes the satellitome. The Library Hypothesis predicts that satDNA in relative species reflects that in their common ancestor, but the evolutionary mechanisms and pathways of satDNA evolution have never been analyzed f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camacho, Juan Pedro M., Cabrero, Josefa, López-León, María Dolores, Martín-Peciña, María, Perfectti, Francisco, Garrido-Ramos, Manuel A., Ruiz-Ruano, Francisco J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01216-9
_version_ 1784646638935998464
author Camacho, Juan Pedro M.
Cabrero, Josefa
López-León, María Dolores
Martín-Peciña, María
Perfectti, Francisco
Garrido-Ramos, Manuel A.
Ruiz-Ruano, Francisco J.
author_facet Camacho, Juan Pedro M.
Cabrero, Josefa
López-León, María Dolores
Martín-Peciña, María
Perfectti, Francisco
Garrido-Ramos, Manuel A.
Ruiz-Ruano, Francisco J.
author_sort Camacho, Juan Pedro M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The full catalog of satellite DNA (satDNA) within a same genome constitutes the satellitome. The Library Hypothesis predicts that satDNA in relative species reflects that in their common ancestor, but the evolutionary mechanisms and pathways of satDNA evolution have never been analyzed for full satellitomes. We compare here the satellitomes of two Oedipodine grasshoppers (Locusta migratoria and Oedaleus decorus) which shared their most recent common ancestor about 22.8 Ma ago. RESULTS: We found that about one third of their satDNA families (near 60 in every species) showed sequence homology and were grouped into 12 orthologous superfamilies. The turnover rate of consensus sequences was extremely variable among the 20 orthologous family pairs analyzed in both species. The satDNAs shared by both species showed poor association with sequence signatures and motives frequently argued as functional, except for short inverted repeats allowing short dyad symmetries and non-B DNA conformations. Orthologous satDNAs frequently showed different FISH patterns at both intra- and interspecific levels. We defined indices of homogenization and degeneration and quantified the level of incomplete library sorting between species. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses revealed that satDNA degenerates through point mutation and homogenizes through partial turnovers caused by massive tandem duplications (the so-called satDNA amplification). Remarkably, satDNA amplification increases homogenization, at intragenomic level, and diversification between species, thus constituting the basis for concerted evolution. We suggest a model of satDNA evolution by means of recursive cycles of amplification and degeneration, leading to mostly contingent evolutionary pathways where concerted evolution emerges promptly after lineages split. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-021-01216-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8822648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88226482022-02-08 Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution Camacho, Juan Pedro M. Cabrero, Josefa López-León, María Dolores Martín-Peciña, María Perfectti, Francisco Garrido-Ramos, Manuel A. Ruiz-Ruano, Francisco J. BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The full catalog of satellite DNA (satDNA) within a same genome constitutes the satellitome. The Library Hypothesis predicts that satDNA in relative species reflects that in their common ancestor, but the evolutionary mechanisms and pathways of satDNA evolution have never been analyzed for full satellitomes. We compare here the satellitomes of two Oedipodine grasshoppers (Locusta migratoria and Oedaleus decorus) which shared their most recent common ancestor about 22.8 Ma ago. RESULTS: We found that about one third of their satDNA families (near 60 in every species) showed sequence homology and were grouped into 12 orthologous superfamilies. The turnover rate of consensus sequences was extremely variable among the 20 orthologous family pairs analyzed in both species. The satDNAs shared by both species showed poor association with sequence signatures and motives frequently argued as functional, except for short inverted repeats allowing short dyad symmetries and non-B DNA conformations. Orthologous satDNAs frequently showed different FISH patterns at both intra- and interspecific levels. We defined indices of homogenization and degeneration and quantified the level of incomplete library sorting between species. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses revealed that satDNA degenerates through point mutation and homogenizes through partial turnovers caused by massive tandem duplications (the so-called satDNA amplification). Remarkably, satDNA amplification increases homogenization, at intragenomic level, and diversification between species, thus constituting the basis for concerted evolution. We suggest a model of satDNA evolution by means of recursive cycles of amplification and degeneration, leading to mostly contingent evolutionary pathways where concerted evolution emerges promptly after lineages split. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-021-01216-9. BioMed Central 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8822648/ /pubmed/35130900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01216-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Camacho, Juan Pedro M.
Cabrero, Josefa
López-León, María Dolores
Martín-Peciña, María
Perfectti, Francisco
Garrido-Ramos, Manuel A.
Ruiz-Ruano, Francisco J.
Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution
title Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution
title_full Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution
title_fullStr Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution
title_full_unstemmed Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution
title_short Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution
title_sort satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite dna evolution
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130900
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01216-9
work_keys_str_mv AT camachojuanpedrom satellitomecomparisonoftwooedipodinegrasshoppershighlightsthecontingentnatureofsatellitednaevolution
AT cabrerojosefa satellitomecomparisonoftwooedipodinegrasshoppershighlightsthecontingentnatureofsatellitednaevolution
AT lopezleonmariadolores satellitomecomparisonoftwooedipodinegrasshoppershighlightsthecontingentnatureofsatellitednaevolution
AT martinpecinamaria satellitomecomparisonoftwooedipodinegrasshoppershighlightsthecontingentnatureofsatellitednaevolution
AT perfecttifrancisco satellitomecomparisonoftwooedipodinegrasshoppershighlightsthecontingentnatureofsatellitednaevolution
AT garridoramosmanuela satellitomecomparisonoftwooedipodinegrasshoppershighlightsthecontingentnatureofsatellitednaevolution
AT ruizruanofranciscoj satellitomecomparisonoftwooedipodinegrasshoppershighlightsthecontingentnatureofsatellitednaevolution