Cargando…
Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution
BACKGROUND: The full catalog of satellite DNA (satDNA) within a same genome constitutes the satellitome. The Library Hypothesis predicts that satDNA in relative species reflects that in their common ancestor, but the evolutionary mechanisms and pathways of satDNA evolution have never been analyzed f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01216-9 |
_version_ | 1784646638935998464 |
---|---|
author | Camacho, Juan Pedro M. Cabrero, Josefa López-León, María Dolores Martín-Peciña, María Perfectti, Francisco Garrido-Ramos, Manuel A. Ruiz-Ruano, Francisco J. |
author_facet | Camacho, Juan Pedro M. Cabrero, Josefa López-León, María Dolores Martín-Peciña, María Perfectti, Francisco Garrido-Ramos, Manuel A. Ruiz-Ruano, Francisco J. |
author_sort | Camacho, Juan Pedro M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The full catalog of satellite DNA (satDNA) within a same genome constitutes the satellitome. The Library Hypothesis predicts that satDNA in relative species reflects that in their common ancestor, but the evolutionary mechanisms and pathways of satDNA evolution have never been analyzed for full satellitomes. We compare here the satellitomes of two Oedipodine grasshoppers (Locusta migratoria and Oedaleus decorus) which shared their most recent common ancestor about 22.8 Ma ago. RESULTS: We found that about one third of their satDNA families (near 60 in every species) showed sequence homology and were grouped into 12 orthologous superfamilies. The turnover rate of consensus sequences was extremely variable among the 20 orthologous family pairs analyzed in both species. The satDNAs shared by both species showed poor association with sequence signatures and motives frequently argued as functional, except for short inverted repeats allowing short dyad symmetries and non-B DNA conformations. Orthologous satDNAs frequently showed different FISH patterns at both intra- and interspecific levels. We defined indices of homogenization and degeneration and quantified the level of incomplete library sorting between species. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses revealed that satDNA degenerates through point mutation and homogenizes through partial turnovers caused by massive tandem duplications (the so-called satDNA amplification). Remarkably, satDNA amplification increases homogenization, at intragenomic level, and diversification between species, thus constituting the basis for concerted evolution. We suggest a model of satDNA evolution by means of recursive cycles of amplification and degeneration, leading to mostly contingent evolutionary pathways where concerted evolution emerges promptly after lineages split. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-021-01216-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8822648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88226482022-02-08 Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution Camacho, Juan Pedro M. Cabrero, Josefa López-León, María Dolores Martín-Peciña, María Perfectti, Francisco Garrido-Ramos, Manuel A. Ruiz-Ruano, Francisco J. BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The full catalog of satellite DNA (satDNA) within a same genome constitutes the satellitome. The Library Hypothesis predicts that satDNA in relative species reflects that in their common ancestor, but the evolutionary mechanisms and pathways of satDNA evolution have never been analyzed for full satellitomes. We compare here the satellitomes of two Oedipodine grasshoppers (Locusta migratoria and Oedaleus decorus) which shared their most recent common ancestor about 22.8 Ma ago. RESULTS: We found that about one third of their satDNA families (near 60 in every species) showed sequence homology and were grouped into 12 orthologous superfamilies. The turnover rate of consensus sequences was extremely variable among the 20 orthologous family pairs analyzed in both species. The satDNAs shared by both species showed poor association with sequence signatures and motives frequently argued as functional, except for short inverted repeats allowing short dyad symmetries and non-B DNA conformations. Orthologous satDNAs frequently showed different FISH patterns at both intra- and interspecific levels. We defined indices of homogenization and degeneration and quantified the level of incomplete library sorting between species. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses revealed that satDNA degenerates through point mutation and homogenizes through partial turnovers caused by massive tandem duplications (the so-called satDNA amplification). Remarkably, satDNA amplification increases homogenization, at intragenomic level, and diversification between species, thus constituting the basis for concerted evolution. We suggest a model of satDNA evolution by means of recursive cycles of amplification and degeneration, leading to mostly contingent evolutionary pathways where concerted evolution emerges promptly after lineages split. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12915-021-01216-9. BioMed Central 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8822648/ /pubmed/35130900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01216-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Camacho, Juan Pedro M. Cabrero, Josefa López-León, María Dolores Martín-Peciña, María Perfectti, Francisco Garrido-Ramos, Manuel A. Ruiz-Ruano, Francisco J. Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution |
title | Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution |
title_full | Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution |
title_fullStr | Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution |
title_full_unstemmed | Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution |
title_short | Satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite DNA evolution |
title_sort | satellitome comparison of two oedipodine grasshoppers highlights the contingent nature of satellite dna evolution |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-021-01216-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT camachojuanpedrom satellitomecomparisonoftwooedipodinegrasshoppershighlightsthecontingentnatureofsatellitednaevolution AT cabrerojosefa satellitomecomparisonoftwooedipodinegrasshoppershighlightsthecontingentnatureofsatellitednaevolution AT lopezleonmariadolores satellitomecomparisonoftwooedipodinegrasshoppershighlightsthecontingentnatureofsatellitednaevolution AT martinpecinamaria satellitomecomparisonoftwooedipodinegrasshoppershighlightsthecontingentnatureofsatellitednaevolution AT perfecttifrancisco satellitomecomparisonoftwooedipodinegrasshoppershighlightsthecontingentnatureofsatellitednaevolution AT garridoramosmanuela satellitomecomparisonoftwooedipodinegrasshoppershighlightsthecontingentnatureofsatellitednaevolution AT ruizruanofranciscoj satellitomecomparisonoftwooedipodinegrasshoppershighlightsthecontingentnatureofsatellitednaevolution |