Cargando…

Does predicted age at peak height velocity explain physical performance in U13–15 basketball female players?

BACKGROUND: The aims of the study were (1) to identify the physical fitness and basic anthropometric characteristics of Polish female basketball players aged 13–15 years, (2) to show the effect of maturity timing on the performance in motor tests and basic body composition parameters, (3) to identif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gryko, Karol, Adamczyk, Jakub Grzegorz, Kopiczko, Anna, Calvo, Jorge Lorenzo, Calvo, Alberto Lorenzo, Mikołajec, Kazimierz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00414-4
_version_ 1784646645165588480
author Gryko, Karol
Adamczyk, Jakub Grzegorz
Kopiczko, Anna
Calvo, Jorge Lorenzo
Calvo, Alberto Lorenzo
Mikołajec, Kazimierz
author_facet Gryko, Karol
Adamczyk, Jakub Grzegorz
Kopiczko, Anna
Calvo, Jorge Lorenzo
Calvo, Alberto Lorenzo
Mikołajec, Kazimierz
author_sort Gryko, Karol
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aims of the study were (1) to identify the physical fitness and basic anthropometric characteristics of Polish female basketball players aged 13–15 years, (2) to show the effect of maturity timing on the performance in motor tests and basic body composition parameters, (3) to identify the index that contributes most to the prediction of performance in the tests of speed, jumping ability, agility, and endurance. METHODS: The sample included 904 female Polish players (U13–15). In part 1, maturity timing category distribution were examined within across age-groups. Maturity timing was followed by grouping with respect to years before or after the observed peak high velocity (PHV): PHV0 (− 0.50 to 0.49), PHV1 (0.50 to 1.49), PHV2 (1.50 to 2.49) and PHV3 (2.50 to 3.49). In part 2, the relationship between the anthropometric variables, physical fitness performance was assessed based on maturity timing categories (ANCOVA analysis). In part 3, backward stepwise multiple regression analyse quantified the relationship between maturity timing (group of PHV) and physical performance. RESULTS: ANCOVA results (age, body height, and body mass as covariates) showed in the U13 female basketball players significantly higher sprinting (20 m), jumping ability and endurance tests results of the PHV1 group. Better results was observed in U14 female players in PHV1 compared to PHV2 and PHV3 in 20 m and jumping tests but opposite trend was observed for 5 m sprint and endurance test (distance covered and VO2(max)). U15 basketball players from the PHV3 group were characterized by better results of jumping abilities, endurance, 10 m and 20 m sprint and agility (total, S(4)) tests. Maturity timing (10 m), chronological age (5 m, 20 m, agility, SVJ, VJ, and VO(2max) tests), body height (10 m), body mass (10 m, 20 m, VJ, VO(2max)), and the interaction between body mass and height (SVJ) were significant (adjusted R(2) = 0.02–0.10; p < 0.001) predictors of motor skills. CONCLUSION: Trainng content of female basketball players aged 13–15 years old should be adjusted to biological requirements especially in jumping, endurance and 20 m sprint test. The time from peak height velocity (PHV) was a significant predictor only in the 10 m sprint test.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8822673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88226732022-02-08 Does predicted age at peak height velocity explain physical performance in U13–15 basketball female players? Gryko, Karol Adamczyk, Jakub Grzegorz Kopiczko, Anna Calvo, Jorge Lorenzo Calvo, Alberto Lorenzo Mikołajec, Kazimierz BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: The aims of the study were (1) to identify the physical fitness and basic anthropometric characteristics of Polish female basketball players aged 13–15 years, (2) to show the effect of maturity timing on the performance in motor tests and basic body composition parameters, (3) to identify the index that contributes most to the prediction of performance in the tests of speed, jumping ability, agility, and endurance. METHODS: The sample included 904 female Polish players (U13–15). In part 1, maturity timing category distribution were examined within across age-groups. Maturity timing was followed by grouping with respect to years before or after the observed peak high velocity (PHV): PHV0 (− 0.50 to 0.49), PHV1 (0.50 to 1.49), PHV2 (1.50 to 2.49) and PHV3 (2.50 to 3.49). In part 2, the relationship between the anthropometric variables, physical fitness performance was assessed based on maturity timing categories (ANCOVA analysis). In part 3, backward stepwise multiple regression analyse quantified the relationship between maturity timing (group of PHV) and physical performance. RESULTS: ANCOVA results (age, body height, and body mass as covariates) showed in the U13 female basketball players significantly higher sprinting (20 m), jumping ability and endurance tests results of the PHV1 group. Better results was observed in U14 female players in PHV1 compared to PHV2 and PHV3 in 20 m and jumping tests but opposite trend was observed for 5 m sprint and endurance test (distance covered and VO2(max)). U15 basketball players from the PHV3 group were characterized by better results of jumping abilities, endurance, 10 m and 20 m sprint and agility (total, S(4)) tests. Maturity timing (10 m), chronological age (5 m, 20 m, agility, SVJ, VJ, and VO(2max) tests), body height (10 m), body mass (10 m, 20 m, VJ, VO(2max)), and the interaction between body mass and height (SVJ) were significant (adjusted R(2) = 0.02–0.10; p < 0.001) predictors of motor skills. CONCLUSION: Trainng content of female basketball players aged 13–15 years old should be adjusted to biological requirements especially in jumping, endurance and 20 m sprint test. The time from peak height velocity (PHV) was a significant predictor only in the 10 m sprint test. BioMed Central 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8822673/ /pubmed/35130944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00414-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Gryko, Karol
Adamczyk, Jakub Grzegorz
Kopiczko, Anna
Calvo, Jorge Lorenzo
Calvo, Alberto Lorenzo
Mikołajec, Kazimierz
Does predicted age at peak height velocity explain physical performance in U13–15 basketball female players?
title Does predicted age at peak height velocity explain physical performance in U13–15 basketball female players?
title_full Does predicted age at peak height velocity explain physical performance in U13–15 basketball female players?
title_fullStr Does predicted age at peak height velocity explain physical performance in U13–15 basketball female players?
title_full_unstemmed Does predicted age at peak height velocity explain physical performance in U13–15 basketball female players?
title_short Does predicted age at peak height velocity explain physical performance in U13–15 basketball female players?
title_sort does predicted age at peak height velocity explain physical performance in u13–15 basketball female players?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00414-4
work_keys_str_mv AT grykokarol doespredictedageatpeakheightvelocityexplainphysicalperformanceinu1315basketballfemaleplayers
AT adamczykjakubgrzegorz doespredictedageatpeakheightvelocityexplainphysicalperformanceinu1315basketballfemaleplayers
AT kopiczkoanna doespredictedageatpeakheightvelocityexplainphysicalperformanceinu1315basketballfemaleplayers
AT calvojorgelorenzo doespredictedageatpeakheightvelocityexplainphysicalperformanceinu1315basketballfemaleplayers
AT calvoalbertolorenzo doespredictedageatpeakheightvelocityexplainphysicalperformanceinu1315basketballfemaleplayers
AT mikołajeckazimierz doespredictedageatpeakheightvelocityexplainphysicalperformanceinu1315basketballfemaleplayers