Cargando…
Deep learning tools for the cancer clinic: an open-source framework with head and neck contour validation
BACKGROUND: With the rapid growth of deep learning research for medical applications comes the need for clinical personnel to be comfortable and familiar with these techniques. Taking a proven approach, we developed a straightforward open-source framework for producing automatic contours for head an...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35135569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-01982-y |
_version_ | 1784646645905883136 |
---|---|
author | Asbach, John C. Singh, Anurag K. Matott, L. Shawn Le, Anh H. |
author_facet | Asbach, John C. Singh, Anurag K. Matott, L. Shawn Le, Anh H. |
author_sort | Asbach, John C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With the rapid growth of deep learning research for medical applications comes the need for clinical personnel to be comfortable and familiar with these techniques. Taking a proven approach, we developed a straightforward open-source framework for producing automatic contours for head and neck planning computed tomography studies using a convolutional neural network (CNN). METHODS: Anonymized studies of 229 patients treated at our clinic for head and neck cancer from 2014 to 2018 were used to train and validate the network. We trained a separate CNN iteration for each of 11 common organs at risk, and then used data from 19 patients previously set aside as test cases for evaluation. We used a commercial atlas-based automatic contouring tool as a comparative benchmark on these test cases to ensure acceptable CNN performance. For the CNN contours and the atlas-based contours, performance was measured using three quantitative metrics and physician reviews using survey and quantifiable correction time for each contour. RESULTS: The CNN achieved statistically better scores than the atlas-based workflow on the quantitative metrics for 7 of the 11 organs at risk. In the physician review, the CNN contours were more likely to need minor corrections but less likely to need substantial corrections, and the cumulative correction time required was less than for the atlas-based contours for all but two test cases. CONCLUSIONS: With this validation, we packaged the code framework and trained CNN parameters and a no-code, browser-based interface to facilitate reproducibility and expansion of the work. All scripts and files are available in a public GitHub repository and are ready for immediate use under the MIT license. Our work introduces a deep learning tool for automatic contouring that is easy for novice personnel to use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-01982-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8822676 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88226762022-02-08 Deep learning tools for the cancer clinic: an open-source framework with head and neck contour validation Asbach, John C. Singh, Anurag K. Matott, L. Shawn Le, Anh H. Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: With the rapid growth of deep learning research for medical applications comes the need for clinical personnel to be comfortable and familiar with these techniques. Taking a proven approach, we developed a straightforward open-source framework for producing automatic contours for head and neck planning computed tomography studies using a convolutional neural network (CNN). METHODS: Anonymized studies of 229 patients treated at our clinic for head and neck cancer from 2014 to 2018 were used to train and validate the network. We trained a separate CNN iteration for each of 11 common organs at risk, and then used data from 19 patients previously set aside as test cases for evaluation. We used a commercial atlas-based automatic contouring tool as a comparative benchmark on these test cases to ensure acceptable CNN performance. For the CNN contours and the atlas-based contours, performance was measured using three quantitative metrics and physician reviews using survey and quantifiable correction time for each contour. RESULTS: The CNN achieved statistically better scores than the atlas-based workflow on the quantitative metrics for 7 of the 11 organs at risk. In the physician review, the CNN contours were more likely to need minor corrections but less likely to need substantial corrections, and the cumulative correction time required was less than for the atlas-based contours for all but two test cases. CONCLUSIONS: With this validation, we packaged the code framework and trained CNN parameters and a no-code, browser-based interface to facilitate reproducibility and expansion of the work. All scripts and files are available in a public GitHub repository and are ready for immediate use under the MIT license. Our work introduces a deep learning tool for automatic contouring that is easy for novice personnel to use. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-01982-y. BioMed Central 2022-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8822676/ /pubmed/35135569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-01982-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Asbach, John C. Singh, Anurag K. Matott, L. Shawn Le, Anh H. Deep learning tools for the cancer clinic: an open-source framework with head and neck contour validation |
title | Deep learning tools for the cancer clinic: an open-source framework with head and neck contour validation |
title_full | Deep learning tools for the cancer clinic: an open-source framework with head and neck contour validation |
title_fullStr | Deep learning tools for the cancer clinic: an open-source framework with head and neck contour validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep learning tools for the cancer clinic: an open-source framework with head and neck contour validation |
title_short | Deep learning tools for the cancer clinic: an open-source framework with head and neck contour validation |
title_sort | deep learning tools for the cancer clinic: an open-source framework with head and neck contour validation |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822676/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35135569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-022-01982-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT asbachjohnc deeplearningtoolsforthecancerclinicanopensourceframeworkwithheadandneckcontourvalidation AT singhanuragk deeplearningtoolsforthecancerclinicanopensourceframeworkwithheadandneckcontourvalidation AT matottlshawn deeplearningtoolsforthecancerclinicanopensourceframeworkwithheadandneckcontourvalidation AT leanhh deeplearningtoolsforthecancerclinicanopensourceframeworkwithheadandneckcontourvalidation |