Cargando…
A comparative human rights analysis of laws and policies for adolescent contraception in Uganda and Kenya
BACKGROUND: Improving access to adolescent contraception information and services is essential to reduce unplanned adolescent pregnancies and maternal mortality in Uganda and Kenya, and attain the SDGs on health and gender equality. This research studies to what degree national laws and policies for...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01303-8 |
_version_ | 1784646655568510976 |
---|---|
author | Perehudoff, Katrina Kibira, Denis Wuyts, Elke Pericas, Carles Omwoha, Joyce van den Ham, Hendrika A. Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje K. Michielsen, Kristien |
author_facet | Perehudoff, Katrina Kibira, Denis Wuyts, Elke Pericas, Carles Omwoha, Joyce van den Ham, Hendrika A. Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje K. Michielsen, Kristien |
author_sort | Perehudoff, Katrina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improving access to adolescent contraception information and services is essential to reduce unplanned adolescent pregnancies and maternal mortality in Uganda and Kenya, and attain the SDGs on health and gender equality. This research studies to what degree national laws and policies for adolescent contraception in Uganda and Kenya are consistent with WHO standards and human rights law. METHODS: This is a comparative content analysis of law and policy documents in force between 2010 and 2018 governing adolescent (age 10–19 years) contraception. Between and within country differences were analysed using WHO’s guidelines “Ensuring human rights in the provision of contraceptive information and services”. RESULTS: Of the 93 laws and policies screened, 26 documents were included (13 policies in Uganda, 13 policies in Kenya). Ugandan policies include a median of 1 WHO recommendation for adolescent contraception per policy (range 0–4) that most frequently concerns contraception accessibility. Ugandan policies have 6/9 WHO recommendations (14/24 sub-recommendations) and miss entirely WHO’s recommendations for adolescent contraception availability, quality, and accountability. On the other hand, most Kenyan policies consistently address multiple WHO recommendations (median 2 recommendations/policy, range 0–6), most frequently for contraception availability and accessibility for adolescents. Kenyan policies cover 8/9 WHO recommendations (16/24 sub-recommendations) except for accountability. CONCLUSIONS: The current policy landscapes for adolescent contraception in Uganda and Kenya include important references to human rights and evidence-based practice (in WHO’s recommendations); however, there is still room for improvement. Aligning national laws and policies with WHO’s recommendations on contraceptive information and services for adolescents may support interventions to improve health outcomes, provided these frameworks are effectively implemented. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-021-01303-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8822716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88227162022-02-08 A comparative human rights analysis of laws and policies for adolescent contraception in Uganda and Kenya Perehudoff, Katrina Kibira, Denis Wuyts, Elke Pericas, Carles Omwoha, Joyce van den Ham, Hendrika A. Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje K. Michielsen, Kristien Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: Improving access to adolescent contraception information and services is essential to reduce unplanned adolescent pregnancies and maternal mortality in Uganda and Kenya, and attain the SDGs on health and gender equality. This research studies to what degree national laws and policies for adolescent contraception in Uganda and Kenya are consistent with WHO standards and human rights law. METHODS: This is a comparative content analysis of law and policy documents in force between 2010 and 2018 governing adolescent (age 10–19 years) contraception. Between and within country differences were analysed using WHO’s guidelines “Ensuring human rights in the provision of contraceptive information and services”. RESULTS: Of the 93 laws and policies screened, 26 documents were included (13 policies in Uganda, 13 policies in Kenya). Ugandan policies include a median of 1 WHO recommendation for adolescent contraception per policy (range 0–4) that most frequently concerns contraception accessibility. Ugandan policies have 6/9 WHO recommendations (14/24 sub-recommendations) and miss entirely WHO’s recommendations for adolescent contraception availability, quality, and accountability. On the other hand, most Kenyan policies consistently address multiple WHO recommendations (median 2 recommendations/policy, range 0–6), most frequently for contraception availability and accessibility for adolescents. Kenyan policies cover 8/9 WHO recommendations (16/24 sub-recommendations) except for accountability. CONCLUSIONS: The current policy landscapes for adolescent contraception in Uganda and Kenya include important references to human rights and evidence-based practice (in WHO’s recommendations); however, there is still room for improvement. Aligning national laws and policies with WHO’s recommendations on contraceptive information and services for adolescents may support interventions to improve health outcomes, provided these frameworks are effectively implemented. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-021-01303-8. BioMed Central 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8822716/ /pubmed/35130932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01303-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Perehudoff, Katrina Kibira, Denis Wuyts, Elke Pericas, Carles Omwoha, Joyce van den Ham, Hendrika A. Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje K. Michielsen, Kristien A comparative human rights analysis of laws and policies for adolescent contraception in Uganda and Kenya |
title | A comparative human rights analysis of laws and policies for adolescent contraception in Uganda and Kenya |
title_full | A comparative human rights analysis of laws and policies for adolescent contraception in Uganda and Kenya |
title_fullStr | A comparative human rights analysis of laws and policies for adolescent contraception in Uganda and Kenya |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative human rights analysis of laws and policies for adolescent contraception in Uganda and Kenya |
title_short | A comparative human rights analysis of laws and policies for adolescent contraception in Uganda and Kenya |
title_sort | comparative human rights analysis of laws and policies for adolescent contraception in uganda and kenya |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130932 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01303-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT perehudoffkatrina acomparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT kibiradenis acomparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT wuytselke acomparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT pericascarles acomparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT omwohajoyce acomparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT vandenhamhendrikaa acomparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT mantelteeuwisseaukjek acomparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT michielsenkristien acomparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT perehudoffkatrina comparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT kibiradenis comparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT wuytselke comparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT pericascarles comparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT omwohajoyce comparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT vandenhamhendrikaa comparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT mantelteeuwisseaukjek comparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya AT michielsenkristien comparativehumanrightsanalysisoflawsandpoliciesforadolescentcontraceptioninugandaandkenya |