Cargando…
Pneumothorax management: current state of practice in the UK
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Spontaneous pneumothorax is a common pathology but optimal initial treatment regime is not well defined. Treatment options including conservative management, needle aspiration (NA) or insertion of a small-bore chest drain. Recent large randomised controlled trials may chang...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-01943-9 |
_version_ | 1784646658102919168 |
---|---|
author | Hallifax, Rob J. Roberts, Mark Russell, Nicky Laskawiec-Szkonter, Magda Walker, Steve P. Maskell, Nick A. Rahman, Najib M. |
author_facet | Hallifax, Rob J. Roberts, Mark Russell, Nicky Laskawiec-Szkonter, Magda Walker, Steve P. Maskell, Nick A. Rahman, Najib M. |
author_sort | Hallifax, Rob J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Spontaneous pneumothorax is a common pathology but optimal initial treatment regime is not well defined. Treatment options including conservative management, needle aspiration (NA) or insertion of a small-bore chest drain. Recent large randomised controlled trials may change the treatment paradigm: comparing conservative and ambulatory management to standard care, but current guidelines need to be updated. The aim of this study was to assess the current “state of play” in the management of pneumothorax in the UK. METHODS: Physicians and respiratory healthcare staff were invited to complete an online survey on the initial and subsequent management of pneumothorax. RESULTS: This study is the first survey of pneumothorax practice across the UK, which highlights variation in practice: 50% would manage a large primary pneumothorax with minimal symptoms conservatively, compared to only 3% if there were significant symptoms; 64% use suction if the pneumothorax had not resolved after > 2 days, 15% always clamp the chest drain prior to removal; whereas 30% never do. NICE guidance recommends the use of digital suction but this has not translated into widespread usage: only 23% use digital suction to check for resolution of air leak). CONCLUSION: Whilst there has always been allowance for individual clinician preference in guidelines, there needs to be consensus on the optimum management strategy. The challenge the new guidelines face is to design a simple and pragmatic approach, using this new evidence base. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8822726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88227262022-02-08 Pneumothorax management: current state of practice in the UK Hallifax, Rob J. Roberts, Mark Russell, Nicky Laskawiec-Szkonter, Magda Walker, Steve P. Maskell, Nick A. Rahman, Najib M. Respir Res Letter to the Editor BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Spontaneous pneumothorax is a common pathology but optimal initial treatment regime is not well defined. Treatment options including conservative management, needle aspiration (NA) or insertion of a small-bore chest drain. Recent large randomised controlled trials may change the treatment paradigm: comparing conservative and ambulatory management to standard care, but current guidelines need to be updated. The aim of this study was to assess the current “state of play” in the management of pneumothorax in the UK. METHODS: Physicians and respiratory healthcare staff were invited to complete an online survey on the initial and subsequent management of pneumothorax. RESULTS: This study is the first survey of pneumothorax practice across the UK, which highlights variation in practice: 50% would manage a large primary pneumothorax with minimal symptoms conservatively, compared to only 3% if there were significant symptoms; 64% use suction if the pneumothorax had not resolved after > 2 days, 15% always clamp the chest drain prior to removal; whereas 30% never do. NICE guidance recommends the use of digital suction but this has not translated into widespread usage: only 23% use digital suction to check for resolution of air leak). CONCLUSION: Whilst there has always been allowance for individual clinician preference in guidelines, there needs to be consensus on the optimum management strategy. The challenge the new guidelines face is to design a simple and pragmatic approach, using this new evidence base. BioMed Central 2022-02-07 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8822726/ /pubmed/35130917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-01943-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Letter to the Editor Hallifax, Rob J. Roberts, Mark Russell, Nicky Laskawiec-Szkonter, Magda Walker, Steve P. Maskell, Nick A. Rahman, Najib M. Pneumothorax management: current state of practice in the UK |
title | Pneumothorax management: current state of practice in the UK |
title_full | Pneumothorax management: current state of practice in the UK |
title_fullStr | Pneumothorax management: current state of practice in the UK |
title_full_unstemmed | Pneumothorax management: current state of practice in the UK |
title_short | Pneumothorax management: current state of practice in the UK |
title_sort | pneumothorax management: current state of practice in the uk |
topic | Letter to the Editor |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-022-01943-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hallifaxrobj pneumothoraxmanagementcurrentstateofpracticeintheuk AT robertsmark pneumothoraxmanagementcurrentstateofpracticeintheuk AT russellnicky pneumothoraxmanagementcurrentstateofpracticeintheuk AT laskawiecszkontermagda pneumothoraxmanagementcurrentstateofpracticeintheuk AT walkerstevep pneumothoraxmanagementcurrentstateofpracticeintheuk AT maskellnicka pneumothoraxmanagementcurrentstateofpracticeintheuk AT rahmannajibm pneumothoraxmanagementcurrentstateofpracticeintheuk |