Cargando…

Measuring medically unjustified hospitalizations in Switzerland

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate use of acute hospital beds is a major topic in health politics. We present here a new approach to measure unnecessary hospitalizations in Medicine and Pediatrics. METHODS: The necessity of a hospital admission was determined using explicit criteria related to the recorded d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eggli, Yves, Halfon, Patricia, Piaget-Rossel, Romain, Bischoff, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07569-3
_version_ 1784646682269450240
author Eggli, Yves
Halfon, Patricia
Piaget-Rossel, Romain
Bischoff, Thomas
author_facet Eggli, Yves
Halfon, Patricia
Piaget-Rossel, Romain
Bischoff, Thomas
author_sort Eggli, Yves
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inappropriate use of acute hospital beds is a major topic in health politics. We present here a new approach to measure unnecessary hospitalizations in Medicine and Pediatrics. METHODS: The necessity of a hospital admission was determined using explicit criteria related to the recorded diagnoses. Two indicators (i.e. “unjustified” and “sometimes justified” stays) were applied to more than 800,000 hospital stays and a random sample of 200 of them was analyzed by two clinicians, using routine data available in medical statistics. The validation of the indicators focused on their precision, validity and adjustment, as well as their usefulness (i.e. interest and risk of abuse). RESULTS: Rates, adjusted for case mix (i.e. age of patient, admission planned or not), showed statistically significant differences among hospitals. Only 6.5% of false positives were observed for “unjustified stays” and 17% for “sometimes justified stays”. Respectively 7 and 12% of stays had an unknown status, due to a lack of sufficiently precise data. Considering true positives only, almost one third of medical and pediatric stays were classified as not strictly justified from a medical point of view in Switzerland. Among these stays, about one fifth could have probably been avoided without risk. To enable a larger ambulatory shift, recommendations were made to strengthen the ambulatory care, notably regarding post-emergency follow-up, cardiac and pulmonary functions’ monitoring, pain management, falls prevention, and specialized at-home services that should be offered. CONCLUSION: We recommend using “unjustified stays” and “sometimes justified stays” indicators to monitor inappropriate hospitalizations. The latter could help the planning of reinforced ambulatory care measures to pursue the ambulatory shift. Nonetheless, we clearly advise against the use of these two indicators for hospitals financing purposes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07569-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8822832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88228322022-02-08 Measuring medically unjustified hospitalizations in Switzerland Eggli, Yves Halfon, Patricia Piaget-Rossel, Romain Bischoff, Thomas BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Inappropriate use of acute hospital beds is a major topic in health politics. We present here a new approach to measure unnecessary hospitalizations in Medicine and Pediatrics. METHODS: The necessity of a hospital admission was determined using explicit criteria related to the recorded diagnoses. Two indicators (i.e. “unjustified” and “sometimes justified” stays) were applied to more than 800,000 hospital stays and a random sample of 200 of them was analyzed by two clinicians, using routine data available in medical statistics. The validation of the indicators focused on their precision, validity and adjustment, as well as their usefulness (i.e. interest and risk of abuse). RESULTS: Rates, adjusted for case mix (i.e. age of patient, admission planned or not), showed statistically significant differences among hospitals. Only 6.5% of false positives were observed for “unjustified stays” and 17% for “sometimes justified stays”. Respectively 7 and 12% of stays had an unknown status, due to a lack of sufficiently precise data. Considering true positives only, almost one third of medical and pediatric stays were classified as not strictly justified from a medical point of view in Switzerland. Among these stays, about one fifth could have probably been avoided without risk. To enable a larger ambulatory shift, recommendations were made to strengthen the ambulatory care, notably regarding post-emergency follow-up, cardiac and pulmonary functions’ monitoring, pain management, falls prevention, and specialized at-home services that should be offered. CONCLUSION: We recommend using “unjustified stays” and “sometimes justified stays” indicators to monitor inappropriate hospitalizations. The latter could help the planning of reinforced ambulatory care measures to pursue the ambulatory shift. Nonetheless, we clearly advise against the use of these two indicators for hospitals financing purposes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07569-3. BioMed Central 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8822832/ /pubmed/35130896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07569-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Eggli, Yves
Halfon, Patricia
Piaget-Rossel, Romain
Bischoff, Thomas
Measuring medically unjustified hospitalizations in Switzerland
title Measuring medically unjustified hospitalizations in Switzerland
title_full Measuring medically unjustified hospitalizations in Switzerland
title_fullStr Measuring medically unjustified hospitalizations in Switzerland
title_full_unstemmed Measuring medically unjustified hospitalizations in Switzerland
title_short Measuring medically unjustified hospitalizations in Switzerland
title_sort measuring medically unjustified hospitalizations in switzerland
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35130896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07569-3
work_keys_str_mv AT eggliyves measuringmedicallyunjustifiedhospitalizationsinswitzerland
AT halfonpatricia measuringmedicallyunjustifiedhospitalizationsinswitzerland
AT piagetrosselromain measuringmedicallyunjustifiedhospitalizationsinswitzerland
AT bischoffthomas measuringmedicallyunjustifiedhospitalizationsinswitzerland