Cargando…

4188 Consistent Differences in Lumbar Spine Alignment Between Low Back Pain Subgroups and Sexes during Clinical and Functional Sitting Tests

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Test the validity of a system for subgrouping people with CLBP by comparing lumbar spine alignment in two CLBP subgroups and sexes during clinical tests of maximum flexed and extended sitting and a functional test of preferred sitting. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using the Movement S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hooker, Quenten L, Lanier, Vanessa M., Van Dillen, Linda R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822978/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.118
_version_ 1784646716460367872
author Hooker, Quenten L
Lanier, Vanessa M.
Van Dillen, Linda R.
author_facet Hooker, Quenten L
Lanier, Vanessa M.
Van Dillen, Linda R.
author_sort Hooker, Quenten L
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Test the validity of a system for subgrouping people with CLBP by comparing lumbar spine alignment in two CLBP subgroups and sexes during clinical tests of maximum flexed and extended sitting and a functional test of preferred sitting. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using the Movement System Impairment classification system, 154 participants with CLBP were subgrouped based on the predominant direction of altered movement and alignment patterns and symptoms during a standardized examination. Participants performed a functional test of preferred sitting followed by clinical tests of maximum flexed and extended sitting in random order. Reflective markers were place superficial to T12, L3 and S1 spinous processes. 3D marker co-ordinate data were collected using an 8 camera motion capture system. Sagittal plane lumbar curvature angle (LCA), defined as the angular distance between T12, L3, and S1 landmarks was calculated for each test. A three-way mixed effect ANOVA model was used to examine the following effects: test, subgroup, sex, test*subgroup, test*sex, subgroup*sex. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Test: Lumbar alignment patterns were different for flexed [LCA = 7.4° (6.1, 8.7)], extended [LCA = −22.6° (−23.9,−21.3)], and preferred [LCA = −3.8° (−5.2,−2.5)] sitting tests. LBP subgroup: Rotation-extension [LCA = −7.5° (−8.7,−6.3)] had more extended lumbar alignment than rotation [LCA = −5.2° (−6.2,−4.2)]. Sex: Women had more extended lumbar alignment [LCA = −10.3° (−11.2,−9.3)] than men [LCA = −2.5° (−3.7,−1.2)]. Test*sex: The difference in lumbar alignment between women and men was smaller during the flexed sitting test [women = 4.2° (2.5, 5.9), men = 9.9° (7.8, 12.1)], compared to extended [women = −27.5° (−29.2, −25.8), men = −17.0° (−9.2, −14.8)] and preferred [women = −7.4° (−9.1, −5.8), men = −0.3° (−2.5, 1.8)]. The test*subgroup (p = 0.84) and subgroup*sex (p = 0.87) interactions were not significant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8822978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88229782022-02-18 4188 Consistent Differences in Lumbar Spine Alignment Between Low Back Pain Subgroups and Sexes during Clinical and Functional Sitting Tests Hooker, Quenten L Lanier, Vanessa M. Van Dillen, Linda R. J Clin Transl Sci Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trial OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Test the validity of a system for subgrouping people with CLBP by comparing lumbar spine alignment in two CLBP subgroups and sexes during clinical tests of maximum flexed and extended sitting and a functional test of preferred sitting. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Using the Movement System Impairment classification system, 154 participants with CLBP were subgrouped based on the predominant direction of altered movement and alignment patterns and symptoms during a standardized examination. Participants performed a functional test of preferred sitting followed by clinical tests of maximum flexed and extended sitting in random order. Reflective markers were place superficial to T12, L3 and S1 spinous processes. 3D marker co-ordinate data were collected using an 8 camera motion capture system. Sagittal plane lumbar curvature angle (LCA), defined as the angular distance between T12, L3, and S1 landmarks was calculated for each test. A three-way mixed effect ANOVA model was used to examine the following effects: test, subgroup, sex, test*subgroup, test*sex, subgroup*sex. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Test: Lumbar alignment patterns were different for flexed [LCA = 7.4° (6.1, 8.7)], extended [LCA = −22.6° (−23.9,−21.3)], and preferred [LCA = −3.8° (−5.2,−2.5)] sitting tests. LBP subgroup: Rotation-extension [LCA = −7.5° (−8.7,−6.3)] had more extended lumbar alignment than rotation [LCA = −5.2° (−6.2,−4.2)]. Sex: Women had more extended lumbar alignment [LCA = −10.3° (−11.2,−9.3)] than men [LCA = −2.5° (−3.7,−1.2)]. Test*sex: The difference in lumbar alignment between women and men was smaller during the flexed sitting test [women = 4.2° (2.5, 5.9), men = 9.9° (7.8, 12.1)], compared to extended [women = −27.5° (−29.2, −25.8), men = −17.0° (−9.2, −14.8)] and preferred [women = −7.4° (−9.1, −5.8), men = −0.3° (−2.5, 1.8)]. The test*subgroup (p = 0.84) and subgroup*sex (p = 0.87) interactions were not significant. Cambridge University Press 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8822978/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.118 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trial
Hooker, Quenten L
Lanier, Vanessa M.
Van Dillen, Linda R.
4188 Consistent Differences in Lumbar Spine Alignment Between Low Back Pain Subgroups and Sexes during Clinical and Functional Sitting Tests
title 4188 Consistent Differences in Lumbar Spine Alignment Between Low Back Pain Subgroups and Sexes during Clinical and Functional Sitting Tests
title_full 4188 Consistent Differences in Lumbar Spine Alignment Between Low Back Pain Subgroups and Sexes during Clinical and Functional Sitting Tests
title_fullStr 4188 Consistent Differences in Lumbar Spine Alignment Between Low Back Pain Subgroups and Sexes during Clinical and Functional Sitting Tests
title_full_unstemmed 4188 Consistent Differences in Lumbar Spine Alignment Between Low Back Pain Subgroups and Sexes during Clinical and Functional Sitting Tests
title_short 4188 Consistent Differences in Lumbar Spine Alignment Between Low Back Pain Subgroups and Sexes during Clinical and Functional Sitting Tests
title_sort 4188 consistent differences in lumbar spine alignment between low back pain subgroups and sexes during clinical and functional sitting tests
topic Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822978/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.118
work_keys_str_mv AT hookerquentenl 4188consistentdifferencesinlumbarspinealignmentbetweenlowbackpainsubgroupsandsexesduringclinicalandfunctionalsittingtests
AT laniervanessam 4188consistentdifferencesinlumbarspinealignmentbetweenlowbackpainsubgroupsandsexesduringclinicalandfunctionalsittingtests
AT vandillenlindar 4188consistentdifferencesinlumbarspinealignmentbetweenlowbackpainsubgroupsandsexesduringclinicalandfunctionalsittingtests