Cargando…

4457 Adopting a Team Science Communication Module for Community-Partnered Teams

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: There is increased recognition that patients and community members are critical to creating impactful research. To this end the UCLA CTSI Community Engagement & Research Program modified an established multidisciplinary team science communication module to train academic-commun...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Arleen F, Norris, Keith, Bross, Rachelle, Castellon, Yelba, Mtume, Norma, Morris, D’Ann, Wright, Aziza Lucas, Barron, Juan, Hakopian, Sarmen, Campo, Maritza Salazar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822983/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.251
_version_ 1784646717691396096
author Brown, Arleen F
Norris, Keith
Bross, Rachelle
Castellon, Yelba
Mtume, Norma
Morris, D’Ann
Wright, Aziza Lucas
Barron, Juan
Hakopian, Sarmen
Campo, Maritza Salazar
author_facet Brown, Arleen F
Norris, Keith
Bross, Rachelle
Castellon, Yelba
Mtume, Norma
Morris, D’Ann
Wright, Aziza Lucas
Barron, Juan
Hakopian, Sarmen
Campo, Maritza Salazar
author_sort Brown, Arleen F
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: There is increased recognition that patients and community members are critical to creating impactful research. To this end the UCLA CTSI Community Engagement & Research Program modified an established multidisciplinary team science communication module to train academic-community research teams. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Community partners who have had previous experience in participatory research provided input such as limiting the emphases of individual academic introductions to group icebreakers (to level the playing field), reduced academic jargon to lay language, reducing the amount of text to key principles, and changed academic team scenarios for the team activity to represent community-academic teams. Academic partners articulated institutional barriers to integrating community into institutional systems. Iterative testing and modifications occurred through pilots with eleven teams (49 individuals). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Embedding community partners in team science training involved creating a level playing field with less emphasis on academic credentials, using lay language in the didactic sessions and ensuring accessibility in all aspects of the training. An example of modifications: communication scenarios were read out loud by participants, which community partners felt were not inclusive of potential varying literacy levels and all partners may not feel comfortable reading aloud in a group setting. The vignettes were replaced with short videos of the scenarios with audio recordings. Several modifications were made the training’s team activity of the training module. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Traditional academic team science training required significant modifications for an academic/community-partnered team to allow for optimal collaboration, inclusion, and strategically reduce the power dynamics that can naturally occur. Long-term followup to assess their effectiveness is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8822983
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88229832022-02-18 4457 Adopting a Team Science Communication Module for Community-Partnered Teams Brown, Arleen F Norris, Keith Bross, Rachelle Castellon, Yelba Mtume, Norma Morris, D’Ann Wright, Aziza Lucas Barron, Juan Hakopian, Sarmen Campo, Maritza Salazar J Clin Transl Sci Health Equity & Community Engagement OBJECTIVES/GOALS: There is increased recognition that patients and community members are critical to creating impactful research. To this end the UCLA CTSI Community Engagement & Research Program modified an established multidisciplinary team science communication module to train academic-community research teams. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Community partners who have had previous experience in participatory research provided input such as limiting the emphases of individual academic introductions to group icebreakers (to level the playing field), reduced academic jargon to lay language, reducing the amount of text to key principles, and changed academic team scenarios for the team activity to represent community-academic teams. Academic partners articulated institutional barriers to integrating community into institutional systems. Iterative testing and modifications occurred through pilots with eleven teams (49 individuals). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Embedding community partners in team science training involved creating a level playing field with less emphasis on academic credentials, using lay language in the didactic sessions and ensuring accessibility in all aspects of the training. An example of modifications: communication scenarios were read out loud by participants, which community partners felt were not inclusive of potential varying literacy levels and all partners may not feel comfortable reading aloud in a group setting. The vignettes were replaced with short videos of the scenarios with audio recordings. Several modifications were made the training’s team activity of the training module. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Traditional academic team science training required significant modifications for an academic/community-partnered team to allow for optimal collaboration, inclusion, and strategically reduce the power dynamics that can naturally occur. Long-term followup to assess their effectiveness is needed. Cambridge University Press 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8822983/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.251 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Health Equity & Community Engagement
Brown, Arleen F
Norris, Keith
Bross, Rachelle
Castellon, Yelba
Mtume, Norma
Morris, D’Ann
Wright, Aziza Lucas
Barron, Juan
Hakopian, Sarmen
Campo, Maritza Salazar
4457 Adopting a Team Science Communication Module for Community-Partnered Teams
title 4457 Adopting a Team Science Communication Module for Community-Partnered Teams
title_full 4457 Adopting a Team Science Communication Module for Community-Partnered Teams
title_fullStr 4457 Adopting a Team Science Communication Module for Community-Partnered Teams
title_full_unstemmed 4457 Adopting a Team Science Communication Module for Community-Partnered Teams
title_short 4457 Adopting a Team Science Communication Module for Community-Partnered Teams
title_sort 4457 adopting a team science communication module for community-partnered teams
topic Health Equity & Community Engagement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822983/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.251
work_keys_str_mv AT brownarleenf 4457adoptingateamsciencecommunicationmoduleforcommunitypartneredteams
AT norriskeith 4457adoptingateamsciencecommunicationmoduleforcommunitypartneredteams
AT brossrachelle 4457adoptingateamsciencecommunicationmoduleforcommunitypartneredteams
AT castellonyelba 4457adoptingateamsciencecommunicationmoduleforcommunitypartneredteams
AT mtumenorma 4457adoptingateamsciencecommunicationmoduleforcommunitypartneredteams
AT morrisdann 4457adoptingateamsciencecommunicationmoduleforcommunitypartneredteams
AT wrightazizalucas 4457adoptingateamsciencecommunicationmoduleforcommunitypartneredteams
AT barronjuan 4457adoptingateamsciencecommunicationmoduleforcommunitypartneredteams
AT hakopiansarmen 4457adoptingateamsciencecommunicationmoduleforcommunitypartneredteams
AT campomaritzasalazar 4457adoptingateamsciencecommunicationmoduleforcommunitypartneredteams