Cargando…

4482 Horizontal ridge augmentation in maxilla using bone expansion vs bone splitting techniques in adult patients: a prospective cohort

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The objective of the study is to compare two horizontal bone augmentation techniques (bone expansion and bone splitting) that are currently used for horizontally deficient maxillary ridges. Bone expanded in millimeters (mm), implant stability, and patient satisfaction will be compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Acevedo, Amanda Figueroa, Pedroza, José E., Elias-Boneta, Augusto, Orsini, Elizabeth, Guerrero, Lidia M., Rivas-Tumanyan, Sona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822991/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.335
_version_ 1784646719639650304
author Acevedo, Amanda Figueroa
Pedroza, José E.
Elias-Boneta, Augusto
Orsini, Elizabeth
Guerrero, Lidia M.
Rivas-Tumanyan, Sona
author_facet Acevedo, Amanda Figueroa
Pedroza, José E.
Elias-Boneta, Augusto
Orsini, Elizabeth
Guerrero, Lidia M.
Rivas-Tumanyan, Sona
author_sort Acevedo, Amanda Figueroa
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The objective of the study is to compare two horizontal bone augmentation techniques (bone expansion and bone splitting) that are currently used for horizontally deficient maxillary ridges. Bone expanded in millimeters (mm), implant stability, and patient satisfaction will be compared with each technique. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This pilot (prospective cohort) study will be divided in two sites, a private practice and the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMS) Clinic at the University of Puerto Rico, School of Dental Medicine. A total of 20 patients will be selected, 10 patients in each site. In both sites, pre-operative and post-operative Cone Beam CT radiographs will be taken to measure bone width. Implant stability will be measured using an Osstell. 2 weeks post-surgery, a patient satisfaction questionnaire will be given to patients. A two-sample T test will be used to compare techniques statistically. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate that bone expansion will be as good as (non-inferiority) bone splitting in terms of bone expanded in millimeters to desire width, and implant diameter will not be compromised. We also expect that implants placed with the bone manipulation technique will have a higher implant stability at baseline and less pain, discomfort and swelling in terms of patient satisfaction. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Our contributions here are expected to illustrate clinical and radiographic bone expansion techniques that will enhance implant placement treatment for implantologists and patient’s experience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8822991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88229912022-02-18 4482 Horizontal ridge augmentation in maxilla using bone expansion vs bone splitting techniques in adult patients: a prospective cohort Acevedo, Amanda Figueroa Pedroza, José E. Elias-Boneta, Augusto Orsini, Elizabeth Guerrero, Lidia M. Rivas-Tumanyan, Sona J Clin Transl Sci Precision Medicine OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The objective of the study is to compare two horizontal bone augmentation techniques (bone expansion and bone splitting) that are currently used for horizontally deficient maxillary ridges. Bone expanded in millimeters (mm), implant stability, and patient satisfaction will be compared with each technique. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This pilot (prospective cohort) study will be divided in two sites, a private practice and the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (OMS) Clinic at the University of Puerto Rico, School of Dental Medicine. A total of 20 patients will be selected, 10 patients in each site. In both sites, pre-operative and post-operative Cone Beam CT radiographs will be taken to measure bone width. Implant stability will be measured using an Osstell. 2 weeks post-surgery, a patient satisfaction questionnaire will be given to patients. A two-sample T test will be used to compare techniques statistically. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: We anticipate that bone expansion will be as good as (non-inferiority) bone splitting in terms of bone expanded in millimeters to desire width, and implant diameter will not be compromised. We also expect that implants placed with the bone manipulation technique will have a higher implant stability at baseline and less pain, discomfort and swelling in terms of patient satisfaction. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Our contributions here are expected to illustrate clinical and radiographic bone expansion techniques that will enhance implant placement treatment for implantologists and patient’s experience. Cambridge University Press 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8822991/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.335 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Precision Medicine
Acevedo, Amanda Figueroa
Pedroza, José E.
Elias-Boneta, Augusto
Orsini, Elizabeth
Guerrero, Lidia M.
Rivas-Tumanyan, Sona
4482 Horizontal ridge augmentation in maxilla using bone expansion vs bone splitting techniques in adult patients: a prospective cohort
title 4482 Horizontal ridge augmentation in maxilla using bone expansion vs bone splitting techniques in adult patients: a prospective cohort
title_full 4482 Horizontal ridge augmentation in maxilla using bone expansion vs bone splitting techniques in adult patients: a prospective cohort
title_fullStr 4482 Horizontal ridge augmentation in maxilla using bone expansion vs bone splitting techniques in adult patients: a prospective cohort
title_full_unstemmed 4482 Horizontal ridge augmentation in maxilla using bone expansion vs bone splitting techniques in adult patients: a prospective cohort
title_short 4482 Horizontal ridge augmentation in maxilla using bone expansion vs bone splitting techniques in adult patients: a prospective cohort
title_sort 4482 horizontal ridge augmentation in maxilla using bone expansion vs bone splitting techniques in adult patients: a prospective cohort
topic Precision Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8822991/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.335
work_keys_str_mv AT acevedoamandafigueroa 4482horizontalridgeaugmentationinmaxillausingboneexpansionvsbonesplittingtechniquesinadultpatientsaprospectivecohort
AT pedrozajosee 4482horizontalridgeaugmentationinmaxillausingboneexpansionvsbonesplittingtechniquesinadultpatientsaprospectivecohort
AT eliasbonetaaugusto 4482horizontalridgeaugmentationinmaxillausingboneexpansionvsbonesplittingtechniquesinadultpatientsaprospectivecohort
AT orsinielizabeth 4482horizontalridgeaugmentationinmaxillausingboneexpansionvsbonesplittingtechniquesinadultpatientsaprospectivecohort
AT guerrerolidiam 4482horizontalridgeaugmentationinmaxillausingboneexpansionvsbonesplittingtechniquesinadultpatientsaprospectivecohort
AT rivastumanyansona 4482horizontalridgeaugmentationinmaxillausingboneexpansionvsbonesplittingtechniquesinadultpatientsaprospectivecohort