Cargando…

4184 Implementation of an Opt-Out recruitment policy at Duke University School of Medicine

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In March 2019, Duke updated recruitment guidelines and adopted an “Engagement” policy that requires patients to ‘opt-out’ of communications regarding potential research participation. This created an opportunity to evaluate recruitment for ongoing clinical studies pre and post impl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mack, Michelle, Roberts, Jamie, Mack, Dalia, Shipes, Steven, Freel, Stephanie A., Stroo, Marissa, McDonald, Roy, Snyder, Denise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823019/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.272
_version_ 1784646726290767872
author Mack, Michelle
Roberts, Jamie
Mack, Dalia
Shipes, Steven
Freel, Stephanie A.
Stroo, Marissa
McDonald, Roy
Snyder, Denise
author_facet Mack, Michelle
Roberts, Jamie
Mack, Dalia
Shipes, Steven
Freel, Stephanie A.
Stroo, Marissa
McDonald, Roy
Snyder, Denise
author_sort Mack, Michelle
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In March 2019, Duke updated recruitment guidelines and adopted an “Engagement” policy that requires patients to ‘opt-out’ of communications regarding potential research participation. This created an opportunity to evaluate recruitment for ongoing clinical studies pre and post implementation. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Implementation of the new policy required new training for study teams, modification to recruitment plans, and expansion of ongoing efforts to improve direct-to-patient messaging through EPIC/MyChart tools. The impact of this new policy on overall recruitment was monitored and characterized both prior to and after implementation of the policy. Customized MyChart messages have been generated for over 22 studies, with a total of 41,386 messages sent to potential participants. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Only a small number of study teams have modified their recruitment plans with transition to the new policy. This may be related to lack of understanding about policy implementation, potential recruitment opportunities, required training, resource limitations, etc. However, our case study, TMIST, had an 48% improvement in average enrollment within the first 2 months of implementation, and an almost 40% improvement in recruitment efficiency. Since becoming an “opt-out” institution, 11 study teams have implemented direct-to-patient recruitment via the MyChart patient portal. One unintended consequence we’ve noted is several different study invitations to potential participants within some patient populations. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The new policy allows study teams to engage in direct-to-patient outreach, leading to an increase in enrollment for some studies. Incorporation of direct-to-patient messaging strategies can be a cost and resource saving measure to improve recruitment. The need to recruit similar populations demonstrated that strategic, thoughtful approaches are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8823019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88230192022-02-18 4184 Implementation of an Opt-Out recruitment policy at Duke University School of Medicine Mack, Michelle Roberts, Jamie Mack, Dalia Shipes, Steven Freel, Stephanie A. Stroo, Marissa McDonald, Roy Snyder, Denise J Clin Transl Sci Health Equity & Community Engagement OBJECTIVES/GOALS: In March 2019, Duke updated recruitment guidelines and adopted an “Engagement” policy that requires patients to ‘opt-out’ of communications regarding potential research participation. This created an opportunity to evaluate recruitment for ongoing clinical studies pre and post implementation. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Implementation of the new policy required new training for study teams, modification to recruitment plans, and expansion of ongoing efforts to improve direct-to-patient messaging through EPIC/MyChart tools. The impact of this new policy on overall recruitment was monitored and characterized both prior to and after implementation of the policy. Customized MyChart messages have been generated for over 22 studies, with a total of 41,386 messages sent to potential participants. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Only a small number of study teams have modified their recruitment plans with transition to the new policy. This may be related to lack of understanding about policy implementation, potential recruitment opportunities, required training, resource limitations, etc. However, our case study, TMIST, had an 48% improvement in average enrollment within the first 2 months of implementation, and an almost 40% improvement in recruitment efficiency. Since becoming an “opt-out” institution, 11 study teams have implemented direct-to-patient recruitment via the MyChart patient portal. One unintended consequence we’ve noted is several different study invitations to potential participants within some patient populations. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The new policy allows study teams to engage in direct-to-patient outreach, leading to an increase in enrollment for some studies. Incorporation of direct-to-patient messaging strategies can be a cost and resource saving measure to improve recruitment. The need to recruit similar populations demonstrated that strategic, thoughtful approaches are needed. Cambridge University Press 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8823019/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.272 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Health Equity & Community Engagement
Mack, Michelle
Roberts, Jamie
Mack, Dalia
Shipes, Steven
Freel, Stephanie A.
Stroo, Marissa
McDonald, Roy
Snyder, Denise
4184 Implementation of an Opt-Out recruitment policy at Duke University School of Medicine
title 4184 Implementation of an Opt-Out recruitment policy at Duke University School of Medicine
title_full 4184 Implementation of an Opt-Out recruitment policy at Duke University School of Medicine
title_fullStr 4184 Implementation of an Opt-Out recruitment policy at Duke University School of Medicine
title_full_unstemmed 4184 Implementation of an Opt-Out recruitment policy at Duke University School of Medicine
title_short 4184 Implementation of an Opt-Out recruitment policy at Duke University School of Medicine
title_sort 4184 implementation of an opt-out recruitment policy at duke university school of medicine
topic Health Equity & Community Engagement
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823019/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.272
work_keys_str_mv AT mackmichelle 4184implementationofanoptoutrecruitmentpolicyatdukeuniversityschoolofmedicine
AT robertsjamie 4184implementationofanoptoutrecruitmentpolicyatdukeuniversityschoolofmedicine
AT mackdalia 4184implementationofanoptoutrecruitmentpolicyatdukeuniversityschoolofmedicine
AT shipessteven 4184implementationofanoptoutrecruitmentpolicyatdukeuniversityschoolofmedicine
AT freelstephaniea 4184implementationofanoptoutrecruitmentpolicyatdukeuniversityschoolofmedicine
AT stroomarissa 4184implementationofanoptoutrecruitmentpolicyatdukeuniversityschoolofmedicine
AT mcdonaldroy 4184implementationofanoptoutrecruitmentpolicyatdukeuniversityschoolofmedicine
AT snyderdenise 4184implementationofanoptoutrecruitmentpolicyatdukeuniversityschoolofmedicine