Cargando…

Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of particle aerosolization with the use of several energy devices used in tonsillectomy and other common upper airway procedures. METHODS: Three different energy devices were measured. These included (a) monopolar electrocautery, (b) bipolar electrocautery, and (c) t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruiz Medina, Leonardo, Moshtaghi, Omid, Kuang, Jessica, Schalch Lepe, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.716
_version_ 1784646742166208512
author Ruiz Medina, Leonardo
Moshtaghi, Omid
Kuang, Jessica
Schalch Lepe, Paul
author_facet Ruiz Medina, Leonardo
Moshtaghi, Omid
Kuang, Jessica
Schalch Lepe, Paul
author_sort Ruiz Medina, Leonardo
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of particle aerosolization with the use of several energy devices used in tonsillectomy and other common upper airway procedures. METHODS: Three different energy devices were measured. These included (a) monopolar electrocautery, (b) bipolar electrocautery, and (c) thermal welding device (TWD). Each device was applied to fresh cadaveric cow tongue and porcine nose. Aerosolized particles produced by these devices were measured using a calibrated electronic particle counter. Measurements were recorded over the course of 3 minutes. Particle sizes were measured at 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 5, and 10 μm. RESULTS: In comparing types of tissues and particle sizes, TWD had the lowest aerosolizing burden among the three devices. By analyzing the highest particle value of TWD against both monopolar and bipolar, monopolar electrocautery proved to have the highest aerosolization exposure with statistical significance at 0.5 and 10 μm. No statistical significance was found when comparing TWD against monopolar electrocautery. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates there is a difference in aerosolization burden dependent on the type of device utilized. TWD proved to have the lowest burden whereas monopolar electrocautery had the highest. CONCLUSION: TWD produces less aerosolization than conventional monopolar electrocautery when cauterizing or ablating tissue in an experimental setting. The degree of aerosolization was comparable to bipolar electrocautery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8823151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88231512022-02-11 Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study Ruiz Medina, Leonardo Moshtaghi, Omid Kuang, Jessica Schalch Lepe, Paul Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of particle aerosolization with the use of several energy devices used in tonsillectomy and other common upper airway procedures. METHODS: Three different energy devices were measured. These included (a) monopolar electrocautery, (b) bipolar electrocautery, and (c) thermal welding device (TWD). Each device was applied to fresh cadaveric cow tongue and porcine nose. Aerosolized particles produced by these devices were measured using a calibrated electronic particle counter. Measurements were recorded over the course of 3 minutes. Particle sizes were measured at 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 5, and 10 μm. RESULTS: In comparing types of tissues and particle sizes, TWD had the lowest aerosolizing burden among the three devices. By analyzing the highest particle value of TWD against both monopolar and bipolar, monopolar electrocautery proved to have the highest aerosolization exposure with statistical significance at 0.5 and 10 μm. No statistical significance was found when comparing TWD against monopolar electrocautery. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates there is a difference in aerosolization burden dependent on the type of device utilized. TWD proved to have the lowest burden whereas monopolar electrocautery had the highest. CONCLUSION: TWD produces less aerosolization than conventional monopolar electrocautery when cauterizing or ablating tissue in an experimental setting. The degree of aerosolization was comparable to bipolar electrocautery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8823151/ /pubmed/35155782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.716 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology
Ruiz Medina, Leonardo
Moshtaghi, Omid
Kuang, Jessica
Schalch Lepe, Paul
Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study
title Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study
title_full Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study
title_fullStr Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study
title_short Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study
title_sort particle aerosolization with energy devices: a comparative study
topic Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155782
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.716
work_keys_str_mv AT ruizmedinaleonardo particleaerosolizationwithenergydevicesacomparativestudy
AT moshtaghiomid particleaerosolizationwithenergydevicesacomparativestudy
AT kuangjessica particleaerosolizationwithenergydevicesacomparativestudy
AT schalchlepepaul particleaerosolizationwithenergydevicesacomparativestudy