Cargando…
Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study
OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of particle aerosolization with the use of several energy devices used in tonsillectomy and other common upper airway procedures. METHODS: Three different energy devices were measured. These included (a) monopolar electrocautery, (b) bipolar electrocautery, and (c) t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.716 |
_version_ | 1784646742166208512 |
---|---|
author | Ruiz Medina, Leonardo Moshtaghi, Omid Kuang, Jessica Schalch Lepe, Paul |
author_facet | Ruiz Medina, Leonardo Moshtaghi, Omid Kuang, Jessica Schalch Lepe, Paul |
author_sort | Ruiz Medina, Leonardo |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of particle aerosolization with the use of several energy devices used in tonsillectomy and other common upper airway procedures. METHODS: Three different energy devices were measured. These included (a) monopolar electrocautery, (b) bipolar electrocautery, and (c) thermal welding device (TWD). Each device was applied to fresh cadaveric cow tongue and porcine nose. Aerosolized particles produced by these devices were measured using a calibrated electronic particle counter. Measurements were recorded over the course of 3 minutes. Particle sizes were measured at 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 5, and 10 μm. RESULTS: In comparing types of tissues and particle sizes, TWD had the lowest aerosolizing burden among the three devices. By analyzing the highest particle value of TWD against both monopolar and bipolar, monopolar electrocautery proved to have the highest aerosolization exposure with statistical significance at 0.5 and 10 μm. No statistical significance was found when comparing TWD against monopolar electrocautery. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates there is a difference in aerosolization burden dependent on the type of device utilized. TWD proved to have the lowest burden whereas monopolar electrocautery had the highest. CONCLUSION: TWD produces less aerosolization than conventional monopolar electrocautery when cauterizing or ablating tissue in an experimental setting. The degree of aerosolization was comparable to bipolar electrocautery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8823151 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88231512022-02-11 Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study Ruiz Medina, Leonardo Moshtaghi, Omid Kuang, Jessica Schalch Lepe, Paul Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of particle aerosolization with the use of several energy devices used in tonsillectomy and other common upper airway procedures. METHODS: Three different energy devices were measured. These included (a) monopolar electrocautery, (b) bipolar electrocautery, and (c) thermal welding device (TWD). Each device was applied to fresh cadaveric cow tongue and porcine nose. Aerosolized particles produced by these devices were measured using a calibrated electronic particle counter. Measurements were recorded over the course of 3 minutes. Particle sizes were measured at 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 5, and 10 μm. RESULTS: In comparing types of tissues and particle sizes, TWD had the lowest aerosolizing burden among the three devices. By analyzing the highest particle value of TWD against both monopolar and bipolar, monopolar electrocautery proved to have the highest aerosolization exposure with statistical significance at 0.5 and 10 μm. No statistical significance was found when comparing TWD against monopolar electrocautery. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates there is a difference in aerosolization burden dependent on the type of device utilized. TWD proved to have the lowest burden whereas monopolar electrocautery had the highest. CONCLUSION: TWD produces less aerosolization than conventional monopolar electrocautery when cauterizing or ablating tissue in an experimental setting. The degree of aerosolization was comparable to bipolar electrocautery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2021-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8823151/ /pubmed/35155782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.716 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology Ruiz Medina, Leonardo Moshtaghi, Omid Kuang, Jessica Schalch Lepe, Paul Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study |
title | Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study |
title_full | Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study |
title_fullStr | Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study |
title_full_unstemmed | Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study |
title_short | Particle aerosolization with energy devices: A comparative study |
title_sort | particle aerosolization with energy devices: a comparative study |
topic | Comprehensive (General) Otolaryngology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823151/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.716 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruizmedinaleonardo particleaerosolizationwithenergydevicesacomparativestudy AT moshtaghiomid particleaerosolizationwithenergydevicesacomparativestudy AT kuangjessica particleaerosolizationwithenergydevicesacomparativestudy AT schalchlepepaul particleaerosolizationwithenergydevicesacomparativestudy |