Cargando…

Gene expression profiling for metastatic risk in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: Over 50% of newly diagnosed cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) lesions occur in the head and neck (cSCC‐HN), and metastasis to nodal basins in this region further complicates surgical and adjuvant treatment. The current study addressed whether the 40‐gene expression profile (40‐GEP)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arron, Sarah T., Wysong, Ashley, Hall, Mary A., Bailey, Christine N., Covington, Kyle R., Kurley, Sarah J., Goldberg, Matthew S., Kasprzak, Julia M., Somani, Ally‐Khan, Ibrahim, Sherrif F., Brodland, David G., Cleaver, Nathan J., Maher, Ian A., Xia, Yang, Koyfman, Shlomo A., Newman, Jason G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.724
_version_ 1784646743163404288
author Arron, Sarah T.
Wysong, Ashley
Hall, Mary A.
Bailey, Christine N.
Covington, Kyle R.
Kurley, Sarah J.
Goldberg, Matthew S.
Kasprzak, Julia M.
Somani, Ally‐Khan
Ibrahim, Sherrif F.
Brodland, David G.
Cleaver, Nathan J.
Maher, Ian A.
Xia, Yang
Koyfman, Shlomo A.
Newman, Jason G.
author_facet Arron, Sarah T.
Wysong, Ashley
Hall, Mary A.
Bailey, Christine N.
Covington, Kyle R.
Kurley, Sarah J.
Goldberg, Matthew S.
Kasprzak, Julia M.
Somani, Ally‐Khan
Ibrahim, Sherrif F.
Brodland, David G.
Cleaver, Nathan J.
Maher, Ian A.
Xia, Yang
Koyfman, Shlomo A.
Newman, Jason G.
author_sort Arron, Sarah T.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Over 50% of newly diagnosed cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) lesions occur in the head and neck (cSCC‐HN), and metastasis to nodal basins in this region further complicates surgical and adjuvant treatment. The current study addressed whether the 40‐gene expression profile (40‐GEP) test can predict metastatic risk in cSCC‐HN with improved accuracy and provide independent prognostic value to complement current risk assessment methods. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded primary tumor tissue and associated clinical data from patients with cSCC‐HN (n = 278) were collected from 33 independent centers. Samples were analyzed via the 40‐GEP test. Cases were staged per American Joint Committee on Cancer, Eighth Edition (AJCC8) and Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) criteria after comprehensive medical record and pathology report review. Metastasis‐free survival (MFS) rates were determined, and risk factors were analyzed via Cox regression. RESULTS: The 40‐GEP test classified the cohort into low (Class 1, n = 126; 45.3%), moderate (Class 2A, n = 134; 48.2%), and high (Class 2B, n = 18; 6.5%) metastatic risk at 3 years postdiagnosis. Regional/distant metastasis occurred in 54 patients (19.4%). MFS rates were 92.1% (Class 1), 76.1% (Class 2A), and 44.4% (Class 2B; p < .0001). Multivariate analysis of 40‐GEP results with AJCC8 or BWH tumor stage, or clinicopathologic risk factors, demonstrated independent prognostic value of the 40‐GEP test (p < .03). Accuracy of predicting metastatic risk was also improved using 40‐GEP classification (p < .02). CONCLUSIONS: Improved metastatic risk stratification through the 40‐GEP test could complement cSCC‐HN risk assessment for better‐informed decision‐making for treatment and surveillance and ultimately improve patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8823155
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88231552022-02-11 Gene expression profiling for metastatic risk in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma Arron, Sarah T. Wysong, Ashley Hall, Mary A. Bailey, Christine N. Covington, Kyle R. Kurley, Sarah J. Goldberg, Matthew S. Kasprzak, Julia M. Somani, Ally‐Khan Ibrahim, Sherrif F. Brodland, David G. Cleaver, Nathan J. Maher, Ian A. Xia, Yang Koyfman, Shlomo A. Newman, Jason G. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Head and Neck, and Tumor Biology OBJECTIVE: Over 50% of newly diagnosed cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) lesions occur in the head and neck (cSCC‐HN), and metastasis to nodal basins in this region further complicates surgical and adjuvant treatment. The current study addressed whether the 40‐gene expression profile (40‐GEP) test can predict metastatic risk in cSCC‐HN with improved accuracy and provide independent prognostic value to complement current risk assessment methods. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded primary tumor tissue and associated clinical data from patients with cSCC‐HN (n = 278) were collected from 33 independent centers. Samples were analyzed via the 40‐GEP test. Cases were staged per American Joint Committee on Cancer, Eighth Edition (AJCC8) and Brigham and Women's Hospital (BWH) criteria after comprehensive medical record and pathology report review. Metastasis‐free survival (MFS) rates were determined, and risk factors were analyzed via Cox regression. RESULTS: The 40‐GEP test classified the cohort into low (Class 1, n = 126; 45.3%), moderate (Class 2A, n = 134; 48.2%), and high (Class 2B, n = 18; 6.5%) metastatic risk at 3 years postdiagnosis. Regional/distant metastasis occurred in 54 patients (19.4%). MFS rates were 92.1% (Class 1), 76.1% (Class 2A), and 44.4% (Class 2B; p < .0001). Multivariate analysis of 40‐GEP results with AJCC8 or BWH tumor stage, or clinicopathologic risk factors, demonstrated independent prognostic value of the 40‐GEP test (p < .03). Accuracy of predicting metastatic risk was also improved using 40‐GEP classification (p < .02). CONCLUSIONS: Improved metastatic risk stratification through the 40‐GEP test could complement cSCC‐HN risk assessment for better‐informed decision‐making for treatment and surveillance and ultimately improve patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2022-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8823155/ /pubmed/35155791 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.724 Text en © 2022 Castle Biosciences, Inc. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Head and Neck, and Tumor Biology
Arron, Sarah T.
Wysong, Ashley
Hall, Mary A.
Bailey, Christine N.
Covington, Kyle R.
Kurley, Sarah J.
Goldberg, Matthew S.
Kasprzak, Julia M.
Somani, Ally‐Khan
Ibrahim, Sherrif F.
Brodland, David G.
Cleaver, Nathan J.
Maher, Ian A.
Xia, Yang
Koyfman, Shlomo A.
Newman, Jason G.
Gene expression profiling for metastatic risk in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
title Gene expression profiling for metastatic risk in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
title_full Gene expression profiling for metastatic risk in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Gene expression profiling for metastatic risk in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Gene expression profiling for metastatic risk in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
title_short Gene expression profiling for metastatic risk in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
title_sort gene expression profiling for metastatic risk in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
topic Head and Neck, and Tumor Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823155/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155791
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.724
work_keys_str_mv AT arronsaraht geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT wysongashley geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT hallmarya geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT baileychristinen geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT covingtonkyler geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT kurleysarahj geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT goldbergmatthews geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT kasprzakjuliam geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT somaniallykhan geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT ibrahimsherriff geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT brodlanddavidg geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT cleavernathanj geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT maheriana geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT xiayang geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT koyfmanshlomoa geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma
AT newmanjasong geneexpressionprofilingformetastaticriskinheadandneckcutaneoussquamouscellcarcinoma