Cargando…

Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the digestive system, and complete resection is the only way to provide a radical cure for resectable GISTs. Open surgery and minimally invasive approaches, including laparoscopy, robotic surgery and en...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mu, Mingchun, Cai, Zhaolun, Liu, Chunyu, Shen, Chaoyong, Yin, Yuan, Yin, Xiaonan, Jiang, Zhiyuan, Zhao, Zhou, Zhang, Bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35131818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050414
_version_ 1784646757794185216
author Mu, Mingchun
Cai, Zhaolun
Liu, Chunyu
Shen, Chaoyong
Yin, Yuan
Yin, Xiaonan
Jiang, Zhiyuan
Zhao, Zhou
Zhang, Bo
author_facet Mu, Mingchun
Cai, Zhaolun
Liu, Chunyu
Shen, Chaoyong
Yin, Yuan
Yin, Xiaonan
Jiang, Zhiyuan
Zhao, Zhou
Zhang, Bo
author_sort Mu, Mingchun
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the digestive system, and complete resection is the only way to provide a radical cure for resectable GISTs. Open surgery and minimally invasive approaches, including laparoscopy, robotic surgery and endoscopy, consist of the mainstream GIST resection. However, there is still a lack of evidence regarding which surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis would be better. Thus, we are planning to conduct a network meta-analysis and systematic review aiming to determine the comparative effectiveness among laparotomy, laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery, and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery in GISTs. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science will be searched for published studies to identify the proper literature comparing open resection, laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery, and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for resecting GISTs from inception to February 2021. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies comparing at least two different interventions for GIST resection will be included. RCTs and non-randomised studies will be synthesised and analysed separately. Bayesian network meta-analysis will be performed to compare the surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis among the resection methods above. The included studies will be divided into several subgroups according to tumour location and size for further analysis. Sensitivity analysis will be performed to identify and explain heterogeneity to make our results robust. Meta-regression will serve as a supplementary method if data are available. The quality of evidence will be evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this network meta-analysis, as it is based on already published data. The findings of the review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021237892.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8823222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88232222022-02-17 Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol Mu, Mingchun Cai, Zhaolun Liu, Chunyu Shen, Chaoyong Yin, Yuan Yin, Xiaonan Jiang, Zhiyuan Zhao, Zhou Zhang, Bo BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the digestive system, and complete resection is the only way to provide a radical cure for resectable GISTs. Open surgery and minimally invasive approaches, including laparoscopy, robotic surgery and endoscopy, consist of the mainstream GIST resection. However, there is still a lack of evidence regarding which surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis would be better. Thus, we are planning to conduct a network meta-analysis and systematic review aiming to determine the comparative effectiveness among laparotomy, laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery, and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery in GISTs. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science will be searched for published studies to identify the proper literature comparing open resection, laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery, and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for resecting GISTs from inception to February 2021. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies comparing at least two different interventions for GIST resection will be included. RCTs and non-randomised studies will be synthesised and analysed separately. Bayesian network meta-analysis will be performed to compare the surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis among the resection methods above. The included studies will be divided into several subgroups according to tumour location and size for further analysis. Sensitivity analysis will be performed to identify and explain heterogeneity to make our results robust. Meta-regression will serve as a supplementary method if data are available. The quality of evidence will be evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this network meta-analysis, as it is based on already published data. The findings of the review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021237892. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8823222/ /pubmed/35131818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050414 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Mu, Mingchun
Cai, Zhaolun
Liu, Chunyu
Shen, Chaoyong
Yin, Yuan
Yin, Xiaonan
Jiang, Zhiyuan
Zhao, Zhou
Zhang, Bo
Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
title Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
title_full Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
title_fullStr Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
title_full_unstemmed Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
title_short Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
title_sort open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
topic Gastroenterology and Hepatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35131818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050414
work_keys_str_mv AT mumingchun openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT caizhaolun openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT liuchunyu openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT shenchaoyong openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT yinyuan openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT yinxiaonan openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT jiangzhiyuan openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT zhaozhou openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT zhangbo openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol