Cargando…
Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the digestive system, and complete resection is the only way to provide a radical cure for resectable GISTs. Open surgery and minimally invasive approaches, including laparoscopy, robotic surgery and en...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35131818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050414 |
_version_ | 1784646757794185216 |
---|---|
author | Mu, Mingchun Cai, Zhaolun Liu, Chunyu Shen, Chaoyong Yin, Yuan Yin, Xiaonan Jiang, Zhiyuan Zhao, Zhou Zhang, Bo |
author_facet | Mu, Mingchun Cai, Zhaolun Liu, Chunyu Shen, Chaoyong Yin, Yuan Yin, Xiaonan Jiang, Zhiyuan Zhao, Zhou Zhang, Bo |
author_sort | Mu, Mingchun |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the digestive system, and complete resection is the only way to provide a radical cure for resectable GISTs. Open surgery and minimally invasive approaches, including laparoscopy, robotic surgery and endoscopy, consist of the mainstream GIST resection. However, there is still a lack of evidence regarding which surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis would be better. Thus, we are planning to conduct a network meta-analysis and systematic review aiming to determine the comparative effectiveness among laparotomy, laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery, and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery in GISTs. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science will be searched for published studies to identify the proper literature comparing open resection, laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery, and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for resecting GISTs from inception to February 2021. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies comparing at least two different interventions for GIST resection will be included. RCTs and non-randomised studies will be synthesised and analysed separately. Bayesian network meta-analysis will be performed to compare the surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis among the resection methods above. The included studies will be divided into several subgroups according to tumour location and size for further analysis. Sensitivity analysis will be performed to identify and explain heterogeneity to make our results robust. Meta-regression will serve as a supplementary method if data are available. The quality of evidence will be evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this network meta-analysis, as it is based on already published data. The findings of the review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021237892. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8823222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88232222022-02-17 Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol Mu, Mingchun Cai, Zhaolun Liu, Chunyu Shen, Chaoyong Yin, Yuan Yin, Xiaonan Jiang, Zhiyuan Zhao, Zhou Zhang, Bo BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology INTRODUCTION: Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumours of the digestive system, and complete resection is the only way to provide a radical cure for resectable GISTs. Open surgery and minimally invasive approaches, including laparoscopy, robotic surgery and endoscopy, consist of the mainstream GIST resection. However, there is still a lack of evidence regarding which surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis would be better. Thus, we are planning to conduct a network meta-analysis and systematic review aiming to determine the comparative effectiveness among laparotomy, laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery, and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery in GISTs. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science will be searched for published studies to identify the proper literature comparing open resection, laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery, and laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for resecting GISTs from inception to February 2021. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies comparing at least two different interventions for GIST resection will be included. RCTs and non-randomised studies will be synthesised and analysed separately. Bayesian network meta-analysis will be performed to compare the surgical outcomes and long-term prognosis among the resection methods above. The included studies will be divided into several subgroups according to tumour location and size for further analysis. Sensitivity analysis will be performed to identify and explain heterogeneity to make our results robust. Meta-regression will serve as a supplementary method if data are available. The quality of evidence will be evaluated by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required for this network meta-analysis, as it is based on already published data. The findings of the review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021237892. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8823222/ /pubmed/35131818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050414 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Gastroenterology and Hepatology Mu, Mingchun Cai, Zhaolun Liu, Chunyu Shen, Chaoyong Yin, Yuan Yin, Xiaonan Jiang, Zhiyuan Zhao, Zhou Zhang, Bo Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol |
title | Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol |
title_full | Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol |
title_fullStr | Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol |
title_short | Open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol |
title_sort | open and minimally invasive surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumours: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol |
topic | Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35131818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050414 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mumingchun openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT caizhaolun openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT liuchunyu openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT shenchaoyong openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT yinyuan openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT yinxiaonan openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT jiangzhiyuan openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT zhaozhou openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol AT zhangbo openandminimallyinvasivesurgeryforgastrointestinalstromaltumoursasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol |