Cargando…

4298 Prediction models for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Many clinical prediction models have been developed to guide tuberculosis (TB) treatment, but their results and methods have not been formally evaluated. We aimed to identify and synthesize existing models for predicting TB treatment outcomes, including bias and applicability asses...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peetluk, Lauren Saag, Ridolfi, Felipe, Rolla, Valeria, Sterling, Timothy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823370/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.138
_version_ 1784646787545432064
author Peetluk, Lauren Saag
Ridolfi, Felipe
Rolla, Valeria
Sterling, Timothy
author_facet Peetluk, Lauren Saag
Ridolfi, Felipe
Rolla, Valeria
Sterling, Timothy
author_sort Peetluk, Lauren Saag
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Many clinical prediction models have been developed to guide tuberculosis (TB) treatment, but their results and methods have not been formally evaluated. We aimed to identify and synthesize existing models for predicting TB treatment outcomes, including bias and applicability assessment. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Our review will adhere to methods that developed specifically for systematic reviews of prediction model studies. We will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (first 200 citations) to identify studies that internally and/or externally validate a model for TB treatment outcomes (defined as one or multiple of cure, treatment completion, death, treatment failure, relapse, default, and lost to follow-up). Study screening, data extraction, and bias assessment will be conducted independently by two reviewers with a third party to resolve discrepancies. Study quality will be assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Our search strategy yielded 6,242 articles in PubMed, 10,585 in Embase, 10,511 in Web of Science, and 200 from Google Scholar, totaling 27,538 articles. After de-duplication, 14,029 articles remain. After screening titles, abstracts, and full-text, we will extract data from relevant studies, including publication details, study characteristics, methods, and results. Data will be summarized with narrative review and in detailed tables with descriptive statistics. We anticipate finding disparate outcome definitions, contrasting predictors across models, and high risk of bias in methods. Meta-analysis of performance measures for model validation studies will be performed if possible. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: TB outcome prediction models are important but existing ones have not been rigorously evaluated. This systematic review will synthesize TB outcome prediction models and serve as guidance to future studies that aim to use or develop TB outcome prediction models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8823370
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88233702022-02-18 4298 Prediction models for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a systematic review Peetluk, Lauren Saag Ridolfi, Felipe Rolla, Valeria Sterling, Timothy J Clin Transl Sci Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trial OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Many clinical prediction models have been developed to guide tuberculosis (TB) treatment, but their results and methods have not been formally evaluated. We aimed to identify and synthesize existing models for predicting TB treatment outcomes, including bias and applicability assessment. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Our review will adhere to methods that developed specifically for systematic reviews of prediction model studies. We will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (first 200 citations) to identify studies that internally and/or externally validate a model for TB treatment outcomes (defined as one or multiple of cure, treatment completion, death, treatment failure, relapse, default, and lost to follow-up). Study screening, data extraction, and bias assessment will be conducted independently by two reviewers with a third party to resolve discrepancies. Study quality will be assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Our search strategy yielded 6,242 articles in PubMed, 10,585 in Embase, 10,511 in Web of Science, and 200 from Google Scholar, totaling 27,538 articles. After de-duplication, 14,029 articles remain. After screening titles, abstracts, and full-text, we will extract data from relevant studies, including publication details, study characteristics, methods, and results. Data will be summarized with narrative review and in detailed tables with descriptive statistics. We anticipate finding disparate outcome definitions, contrasting predictors across models, and high risk of bias in methods. Meta-analysis of performance measures for model validation studies will be performed if possible. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: TB outcome prediction models are important but existing ones have not been rigorously evaluated. This systematic review will synthesize TB outcome prediction models and serve as guidance to future studies that aim to use or develop TB outcome prediction models. Cambridge University Press 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8823370/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.138 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trial
Peetluk, Lauren Saag
Ridolfi, Felipe
Rolla, Valeria
Sterling, Timothy
4298 Prediction models for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a systematic review
title 4298 Prediction models for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a systematic review
title_full 4298 Prediction models for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a systematic review
title_fullStr 4298 Prediction models for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed 4298 Prediction models for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a systematic review
title_short 4298 Prediction models for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a systematic review
title_sort 4298 prediction models for pulmonary tuberculosis treatment outcomes: a systematic review
topic Clinical Epidemiology/Clinical Trial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823370/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.138
work_keys_str_mv AT peetluklaurensaag 4298predictionmodelsforpulmonarytuberculosistreatmentoutcomesasystematicreview
AT ridolfifelipe 4298predictionmodelsforpulmonarytuberculosistreatmentoutcomesasystematicreview
AT rollavaleria 4298predictionmodelsforpulmonarytuberculosistreatmentoutcomesasystematicreview
AT sterlingtimothy 4298predictionmodelsforpulmonarytuberculosistreatmentoutcomesasystematicreview