Cargando…

4182 Use of Machine Learning for Surgical Outcomes Research: what are the clinical implications?

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Multivariate regression is used for surgical outcomes analyses; but does not allow for evaluation of all variables. Machine learning could be the perfect alternative to address this issue. Our aim was to evaluate whether machine learning is a feasible alternative to evaluate surgic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Armijo, Priscila Rodrigues, Bonthu, Sindhura, Schiller, Alicia, Zhu, Qiuming, Tanner, Tiffany
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823390/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.187
_version_ 1784646792425504768
author Armijo, Priscila Rodrigues
Bonthu, Sindhura
Schiller, Alicia
Zhu, Qiuming
Tanner, Tiffany
author_facet Armijo, Priscila Rodrigues
Bonthu, Sindhura
Schiller, Alicia
Zhu, Qiuming
Tanner, Tiffany
author_sort Armijo, Priscila Rodrigues
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Multivariate regression is used for surgical outcomes analyses; but does not allow for evaluation of all variables. Machine learning could be the perfect alternative to address this issue. Our aim was to evaluate whether machine learning is a feasible alternative to evaluate surgical outcomes. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: H-CUP National Inpatient Sample database was queried for adult patients with colorectal cancer who underwent colorectal resection, while the NSQIP database was queried for adult patients with rectal cancer who underwent proctectomy. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors associated with 30-day complications following those procedures. Subsequently, machine learning techniques of under-sampling and oversampling were applied to the same datasets for the evaluation of risk factors for the same outcome. These techniques were used to achieve a larger population sample size and to detect statistical significance. Results between the two methodologies were compared. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Multivariate regression revealed that open approach, gender, race, geographic location, number of comorbidities, and type of insurance was associated with increased 30-day mortality in colorectal resection patients. Conversely, the use of machine learning revealed that preoperative weight loss, preexistent chest heart failure, renal failure or perivascular disease were strongly associated with 30-day mortality. For proctectomy patients, multivariate regression found no association between surgical approach and 30-day mortality. However, machine learning revealed gender, hypertension, and reoperation to be strongly associated with 30-day mortality. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Machine learning enabled multiple combinations that were not possible to examine in a conventional multivariate regression analysis. Machine learning compared to traditional multivariate regression produced significantly different outcomes, highlighting the need for in depth of these methodologies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8823390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88233902022-02-18 4182 Use of Machine Learning for Surgical Outcomes Research: what are the clinical implications? Armijo, Priscila Rodrigues Bonthu, Sindhura Schiller, Alicia Zhu, Qiuming Tanner, Tiffany J Clin Transl Sci Data Science/Biostatistics/Informatics OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Multivariate regression is used for surgical outcomes analyses; but does not allow for evaluation of all variables. Machine learning could be the perfect alternative to address this issue. Our aim was to evaluate whether machine learning is a feasible alternative to evaluate surgical outcomes. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: H-CUP National Inpatient Sample database was queried for adult patients with colorectal cancer who underwent colorectal resection, while the NSQIP database was queried for adult patients with rectal cancer who underwent proctectomy. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors associated with 30-day complications following those procedures. Subsequently, machine learning techniques of under-sampling and oversampling were applied to the same datasets for the evaluation of risk factors for the same outcome. These techniques were used to achieve a larger population sample size and to detect statistical significance. Results between the two methodologies were compared. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Multivariate regression revealed that open approach, gender, race, geographic location, number of comorbidities, and type of insurance was associated with increased 30-day mortality in colorectal resection patients. Conversely, the use of machine learning revealed that preoperative weight loss, preexistent chest heart failure, renal failure or perivascular disease were strongly associated with 30-day mortality. For proctectomy patients, multivariate regression found no association between surgical approach and 30-day mortality. However, machine learning revealed gender, hypertension, and reoperation to be strongly associated with 30-day mortality. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Machine learning enabled multiple combinations that were not possible to examine in a conventional multivariate regression analysis. Machine learning compared to traditional multivariate regression produced significantly different outcomes, highlighting the need for in depth of these methodologies. Cambridge University Press 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8823390/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.187 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Data Science/Biostatistics/Informatics
Armijo, Priscila Rodrigues
Bonthu, Sindhura
Schiller, Alicia
Zhu, Qiuming
Tanner, Tiffany
4182 Use of Machine Learning for Surgical Outcomes Research: what are the clinical implications?
title 4182 Use of Machine Learning for Surgical Outcomes Research: what are the clinical implications?
title_full 4182 Use of Machine Learning for Surgical Outcomes Research: what are the clinical implications?
title_fullStr 4182 Use of Machine Learning for Surgical Outcomes Research: what are the clinical implications?
title_full_unstemmed 4182 Use of Machine Learning for Surgical Outcomes Research: what are the clinical implications?
title_short 4182 Use of Machine Learning for Surgical Outcomes Research: what are the clinical implications?
title_sort 4182 use of machine learning for surgical outcomes research: what are the clinical implications?
topic Data Science/Biostatistics/Informatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823390/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.187
work_keys_str_mv AT armijopriscilarodrigues 4182useofmachinelearningforsurgicaloutcomesresearchwhataretheclinicalimplications
AT bonthusindhura 4182useofmachinelearningforsurgicaloutcomesresearchwhataretheclinicalimplications
AT schilleralicia 4182useofmachinelearningforsurgicaloutcomesresearchwhataretheclinicalimplications
AT zhuqiuming 4182useofmachinelearningforsurgicaloutcomesresearchwhataretheclinicalimplications
AT tannertiffany 4182useofmachinelearningforsurgicaloutcomesresearchwhataretheclinicalimplications