Cargando…

4049 Evaluating Miami CTSI’s Pilot, Translational, and Clinical Studies Program using research success measures and CTSA Common Metrics

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal of this project was to a) evaluate the first five years of Miami CTSI’s Pilot Translational and Clinical Studies Program using outcome measures that quantify research productivity augmented by the CTSA Common Metrics; and b) use the results to shape future program manageme...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Das, Rosalina, Avissar, Patricia, Diaz, Jessica, Dominguez, Sheela C, Issenberg, Barry S., Dietrich, Dalton W., Sacco, Ralph L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823414/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.234
_version_ 1784646797279363072
author Das, Rosalina
Avissar, Patricia
Diaz, Jessica
Dominguez, Sheela C
Issenberg, Barry S.
Dietrich, Dalton W.
Sacco, Ralph L.
author_facet Das, Rosalina
Avissar, Patricia
Diaz, Jessica
Dominguez, Sheela C
Issenberg, Barry S.
Dietrich, Dalton W.
Sacco, Ralph L.
author_sort Das, Rosalina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal of this project was to a) evaluate the first five years of Miami CTSI’s Pilot Translational and Clinical Studies Program using outcome measures that quantify research productivity augmented by the CTSA Common Metrics; and b) use the results to shape future program management. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Pilot Program applicant and awardee demographic data were collected during the first 5-year cycle of the Miami CTSI grant. Projects were categorized into the translation spectrum based on type of research using published guidelines. Research productivity from funded pilot projects were tracked annually using internal institutional grant award databases and external databases such as PubMed and NIH Reporter. CTSA Common Metrics were tracked using the Results Based Accountability framework. Relative Citation Ratio (RCR), NIH percentile and translation impact of pilot project publications were determined using the iCite tool (NIH Office of Portfolio Analysis). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The Miami CTSI’s Pilot Award Program demonstrated notable success in its first five years. Of the twenty-two projects that were funded during that time period, 45% led to follow-on funding for a total of $17.2M—a strong return on investment of 15:1. Further, 77% of awardees had at least one publication. A total of four patents and 43 publications resulted directly from the funded projects. The mean RCR for all publications was 2.7, weighted RCR was 99.87, and nine papers were been cited by clinical documents. Overall, 63% of the projects were classified as T1/T2 (pre-clinical/clinical research) and 37% as T3/T4 (post-clinical translational research/public health). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Miami CTSI’s Pilot Award Program demonstrated success in scholarly output, follow on funding, and scientific impact. These results will serve as benchmarks going forward and will allow the CTSI to leverage program strengths in collaborating with other institutional internal award mechanisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8823414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88234142022-02-18 4049 Evaluating Miami CTSI’s Pilot, Translational, and Clinical Studies Program using research success measures and CTSA Common Metrics Das, Rosalina Avissar, Patricia Diaz, Jessica Dominguez, Sheela C Issenberg, Barry S. Dietrich, Dalton W. Sacco, Ralph L. J Clin Transl Sci Evaluation OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The goal of this project was to a) evaluate the first five years of Miami CTSI’s Pilot Translational and Clinical Studies Program using outcome measures that quantify research productivity augmented by the CTSA Common Metrics; and b) use the results to shape future program management. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Pilot Program applicant and awardee demographic data were collected during the first 5-year cycle of the Miami CTSI grant. Projects were categorized into the translation spectrum based on type of research using published guidelines. Research productivity from funded pilot projects were tracked annually using internal institutional grant award databases and external databases such as PubMed and NIH Reporter. CTSA Common Metrics were tracked using the Results Based Accountability framework. Relative Citation Ratio (RCR), NIH percentile and translation impact of pilot project publications were determined using the iCite tool (NIH Office of Portfolio Analysis). RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The Miami CTSI’s Pilot Award Program demonstrated notable success in its first five years. Of the twenty-two projects that were funded during that time period, 45% led to follow-on funding for a total of $17.2M—a strong return on investment of 15:1. Further, 77% of awardees had at least one publication. A total of four patents and 43 publications resulted directly from the funded projects. The mean RCR for all publications was 2.7, weighted RCR was 99.87, and nine papers were been cited by clinical documents. Overall, 63% of the projects were classified as T1/T2 (pre-clinical/clinical research) and 37% as T3/T4 (post-clinical translational research/public health). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: Miami CTSI’s Pilot Award Program demonstrated success in scholarly output, follow on funding, and scientific impact. These results will serve as benchmarks going forward and will allow the CTSI to leverage program strengths in collaborating with other institutional internal award mechanisms. Cambridge University Press 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8823414/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.234 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Evaluation
Das, Rosalina
Avissar, Patricia
Diaz, Jessica
Dominguez, Sheela C
Issenberg, Barry S.
Dietrich, Dalton W.
Sacco, Ralph L.
4049 Evaluating Miami CTSI’s Pilot, Translational, and Clinical Studies Program using research success measures and CTSA Common Metrics
title 4049 Evaluating Miami CTSI’s Pilot, Translational, and Clinical Studies Program using research success measures and CTSA Common Metrics
title_full 4049 Evaluating Miami CTSI’s Pilot, Translational, and Clinical Studies Program using research success measures and CTSA Common Metrics
title_fullStr 4049 Evaluating Miami CTSI’s Pilot, Translational, and Clinical Studies Program using research success measures and CTSA Common Metrics
title_full_unstemmed 4049 Evaluating Miami CTSI’s Pilot, Translational, and Clinical Studies Program using research success measures and CTSA Common Metrics
title_short 4049 Evaluating Miami CTSI’s Pilot, Translational, and Clinical Studies Program using research success measures and CTSA Common Metrics
title_sort 4049 evaluating miami ctsi’s pilot, translational, and clinical studies program using research success measures and ctsa common metrics
topic Evaluation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823414/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.234
work_keys_str_mv AT dasrosalina 4049evaluatingmiamictsispilottranslationalandclinicalstudiesprogramusingresearchsuccessmeasuresandctsacommonmetrics
AT avissarpatricia 4049evaluatingmiamictsispilottranslationalandclinicalstudiesprogramusingresearchsuccessmeasuresandctsacommonmetrics
AT diazjessica 4049evaluatingmiamictsispilottranslationalandclinicalstudiesprogramusingresearchsuccessmeasuresandctsacommonmetrics
AT dominguezsheelac 4049evaluatingmiamictsispilottranslationalandclinicalstudiesprogramusingresearchsuccessmeasuresandctsacommonmetrics
AT issenbergbarrys 4049evaluatingmiamictsispilottranslationalandclinicalstudiesprogramusingresearchsuccessmeasuresandctsacommonmetrics
AT dietrichdaltonw 4049evaluatingmiamictsispilottranslationalandclinicalstudiesprogramusingresearchsuccessmeasuresandctsacommonmetrics
AT saccoralphl 4049evaluatingmiamictsispilottranslationalandclinicalstudiesprogramusingresearchsuccessmeasuresandctsacommonmetrics