Cargando…

4134 Report from the research trenches: A mixed-methods approach to investigation of how recruitment methods, culture and collaboration impact clinical trial accrual

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The research project aimed to understand the perceived effectiveness of research recruitment methods, including informatics tool utilization, so that best practices can be established and outcomes measured longitudinally. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The mixed-methods study was conduc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swartz, Kitt, Zauflik, Meredith, zell, Adrienne, Morris, Cynthia, Ellison, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823418/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.242
_version_ 1784646797992394752
author Swartz, Kitt
Zauflik, Meredith
zell, Adrienne
Morris, Cynthia
Ellison, David
author_facet Swartz, Kitt
Zauflik, Meredith
zell, Adrienne
Morris, Cynthia
Ellison, David
author_sort Swartz, Kitt
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The research project aimed to understand the perceived effectiveness of research recruitment methods, including informatics tool utilization, so that best practices can be established and outcomes measured longitudinally. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The mixed-methods study was conducted by the Oregon Clinical and Translational Science Institute, the CTSA at Oregon Health and Sciences University. A survey, clinical trial accrual data, and interviews were used to assess the study aims. The survey asked about utilization and value of specific recruitment tools and methods. Accrual data was obtained from the clinical trial management system and analyzed using parameters from the CTSA “Accrual Metric”. The metric was calculated for clinical trials enrolling during 2017. Interviews were conducted with researchers identified by the survey and over or under-enrolled accrual data, and inquired about recruitment facilitators and barriers. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The most frequently mentioned facilitator of recruitment was direct patient contact, either in the healthcare setting (58.4% of survey respondents) or through patient outreach (32%). A lack of resources was considered a key barrier (21% of survey respondents) and a stated need (27%). Interview data expanded on these findings, as 23% of interviewees indicated a collaborative culture, which includes clinic integration, was key to recruitment success. Additionally, 20% of interviewees identified resources (i.e. funding, staff, time) as their greatest need. Notably, 13% of studies with an accrual ratio of “0” had frequent staff turnover. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This approach allowed for a uniquely targeted analysis of accrual facilitators and barriers. Use of the CTSA accrual metric identified high-value interview respondents and will allow for investigation into additional accrual questions, such as the impact of funding sources and departmental factors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8823418
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88234182022-02-18 4134 Report from the research trenches: A mixed-methods approach to investigation of how recruitment methods, culture and collaboration impact clinical trial accrual Swartz, Kitt Zauflik, Meredith zell, Adrienne Morris, Cynthia Ellison, David J Clin Transl Sci Evaluation OBJECTIVES/GOALS: The research project aimed to understand the perceived effectiveness of research recruitment methods, including informatics tool utilization, so that best practices can be established and outcomes measured longitudinally. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: The mixed-methods study was conducted by the Oregon Clinical and Translational Science Institute, the CTSA at Oregon Health and Sciences University. A survey, clinical trial accrual data, and interviews were used to assess the study aims. The survey asked about utilization and value of specific recruitment tools and methods. Accrual data was obtained from the clinical trial management system and analyzed using parameters from the CTSA “Accrual Metric”. The metric was calculated for clinical trials enrolling during 2017. Interviews were conducted with researchers identified by the survey and over or under-enrolled accrual data, and inquired about recruitment facilitators and barriers. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The most frequently mentioned facilitator of recruitment was direct patient contact, either in the healthcare setting (58.4% of survey respondents) or through patient outreach (32%). A lack of resources was considered a key barrier (21% of survey respondents) and a stated need (27%). Interview data expanded on these findings, as 23% of interviewees indicated a collaborative culture, which includes clinic integration, was key to recruitment success. Additionally, 20% of interviewees identified resources (i.e. funding, staff, time) as their greatest need. Notably, 13% of studies with an accrual ratio of “0” had frequent staff turnover. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This approach allowed for a uniquely targeted analysis of accrual facilitators and barriers. Use of the CTSA accrual metric identified high-value interview respondents and will allow for investigation into additional accrual questions, such as the impact of funding sources and departmental factors. Cambridge University Press 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8823418/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.242 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Evaluation
Swartz, Kitt
Zauflik, Meredith
zell, Adrienne
Morris, Cynthia
Ellison, David
4134 Report from the research trenches: A mixed-methods approach to investigation of how recruitment methods, culture and collaboration impact clinical trial accrual
title 4134 Report from the research trenches: A mixed-methods approach to investigation of how recruitment methods, culture and collaboration impact clinical trial accrual
title_full 4134 Report from the research trenches: A mixed-methods approach to investigation of how recruitment methods, culture and collaboration impact clinical trial accrual
title_fullStr 4134 Report from the research trenches: A mixed-methods approach to investigation of how recruitment methods, culture and collaboration impact clinical trial accrual
title_full_unstemmed 4134 Report from the research trenches: A mixed-methods approach to investigation of how recruitment methods, culture and collaboration impact clinical trial accrual
title_short 4134 Report from the research trenches: A mixed-methods approach to investigation of how recruitment methods, culture and collaboration impact clinical trial accrual
title_sort 4134 report from the research trenches: a mixed-methods approach to investigation of how recruitment methods, culture and collaboration impact clinical trial accrual
topic Evaluation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823418/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.242
work_keys_str_mv AT swartzkitt 4134reportfromtheresearchtrenchesamixedmethodsapproachtoinvestigationofhowrecruitmentmethodscultureandcollaborationimpactclinicaltrialaccrual
AT zauflikmeredith 4134reportfromtheresearchtrenchesamixedmethodsapproachtoinvestigationofhowrecruitmentmethodscultureandcollaborationimpactclinicaltrialaccrual
AT zelladrienne 4134reportfromtheresearchtrenchesamixedmethodsapproachtoinvestigationofhowrecruitmentmethodscultureandcollaborationimpactclinicaltrialaccrual
AT morriscynthia 4134reportfromtheresearchtrenchesamixedmethodsapproachtoinvestigationofhowrecruitmentmethodscultureandcollaborationimpactclinicaltrialaccrual
AT ellisondavid 4134reportfromtheresearchtrenchesamixedmethodsapproachtoinvestigationofhowrecruitmentmethodscultureandcollaborationimpactclinicaltrialaccrual