Cargando…
4079 Lessons learned from implementing Quality Improvement (QI) in academic clinical research setting
OBJECTIVES/GOALS: We describe here the implementation of a pilot Quality Improvement (QI) program in clinical research processes in order to facilitate translation from bench to community. This presentation will also discuss challenges encountered by the research teams during the implementation of Q...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823612/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.241 |
_version_ | 1784646839605133312 |
---|---|
author | Lee, Chin Chin JAYAWEERA, DUSHYANTHA Godfrey, Marjorie Salathe, Matthias Wright, Jonelle Sacco, Ralph L. |
author_facet | Lee, Chin Chin JAYAWEERA, DUSHYANTHA Godfrey, Marjorie Salathe, Matthias Wright, Jonelle Sacco, Ralph L. |
author_sort | Lee, Chin Chin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES/GOALS: We describe here the implementation of a pilot Quality Improvement (QI) program in clinical research processes in order to facilitate translation from bench to community. This presentation will also discuss challenges encountered by the research teams during the implementation of QI activities. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Miami CTSI collaborated with University of Kansas’ CTSA to test the implementation of a QI program for clinical research processes. The program has a duration of 1 year and consists of multi-modal training and coaching sessions with different research teams. Six teams comprising of Principal investigators, clinical coordinators, and regulatory specialists participated in the program based in applied clinical microsystem theory science. Team coaches and teams worked together to assess current processes, test new and improved processes, and standardize and disseminate applicable best practices of the QI program. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The implementation of QI activities in large clinical research settings poses numerous challenges for the research team. We will present survey results from the coaching sessions and follow on feedback from the different teams involved in the program to implement the QI activities. We will describe the modifications and adjustments made to the original conceptual framework of QI program in order for it to be applicable and feasible for the settings of the University of Miami. We will provide recommendations for other academic clinical research centers that are considering implementing a QI program. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The successful adaptation of a QI process to implement in academic clinical research settings relies on early engagement of the institution leadership, careful selection of team members, as well as developing communication skills to enhance team dynamics as a clinical research unit. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8823612 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88236122022-02-18 4079 Lessons learned from implementing Quality Improvement (QI) in academic clinical research setting Lee, Chin Chin JAYAWEERA, DUSHYANTHA Godfrey, Marjorie Salathe, Matthias Wright, Jonelle Sacco, Ralph L. J Clin Transl Sci Evaluation OBJECTIVES/GOALS: We describe here the implementation of a pilot Quality Improvement (QI) program in clinical research processes in order to facilitate translation from bench to community. This presentation will also discuss challenges encountered by the research teams during the implementation of QI activities. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Miami CTSI collaborated with University of Kansas’ CTSA to test the implementation of a QI program for clinical research processes. The program has a duration of 1 year and consists of multi-modal training and coaching sessions with different research teams. Six teams comprising of Principal investigators, clinical coordinators, and regulatory specialists participated in the program based in applied clinical microsystem theory science. Team coaches and teams worked together to assess current processes, test new and improved processes, and standardize and disseminate applicable best practices of the QI program. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The implementation of QI activities in large clinical research settings poses numerous challenges for the research team. We will present survey results from the coaching sessions and follow on feedback from the different teams involved in the program to implement the QI activities. We will describe the modifications and adjustments made to the original conceptual framework of QI program in order for it to be applicable and feasible for the settings of the University of Miami. We will provide recommendations for other academic clinical research centers that are considering implementing a QI program. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: The successful adaptation of a QI process to implement in academic clinical research settings relies on early engagement of the institution leadership, careful selection of team members, as well as developing communication skills to enhance team dynamics as a clinical research unit. Cambridge University Press 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8823612/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.241 Text en © The Association for Clinical and Translational Science 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Evaluation Lee, Chin Chin JAYAWEERA, DUSHYANTHA Godfrey, Marjorie Salathe, Matthias Wright, Jonelle Sacco, Ralph L. 4079 Lessons learned from implementing Quality Improvement (QI) in academic clinical research setting |
title | 4079 Lessons learned from implementing Quality Improvement (QI) in academic clinical research setting |
title_full | 4079 Lessons learned from implementing Quality Improvement (QI) in academic clinical research setting |
title_fullStr | 4079 Lessons learned from implementing Quality Improvement (QI) in academic clinical research setting |
title_full_unstemmed | 4079 Lessons learned from implementing Quality Improvement (QI) in academic clinical research setting |
title_short | 4079 Lessons learned from implementing Quality Improvement (QI) in academic clinical research setting |
title_sort | 4079 lessons learned from implementing quality improvement (qi) in academic clinical research setting |
topic | Evaluation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8823612/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cts.2020.241 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leechinchin 4079lessonslearnedfromimplementingqualityimprovementqiinacademicclinicalresearchsetting AT jayaweeradushyantha 4079lessonslearnedfromimplementingqualityimprovementqiinacademicclinicalresearchsetting AT godfreymarjorie 4079lessonslearnedfromimplementingqualityimprovementqiinacademicclinicalresearchsetting AT salathematthias 4079lessonslearnedfromimplementingqualityimprovementqiinacademicclinicalresearchsetting AT wrightjonelle 4079lessonslearnedfromimplementingqualityimprovementqiinacademicclinicalresearchsetting AT saccoralphl 4079lessonslearnedfromimplementingqualityimprovementqiinacademicclinicalresearchsetting |