Cargando…

Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study

Lonely people often crave connectedness. However, they may also experience their environment as threatening, entering a self-preserving state that perpetuates loneliness. Research shows conflicting evidence about their response to positive social cues, and little is known about their experience of o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saporta, Nira, Peled-Avron, Leehe, Scheele, Dirk, Lieberz, Jana, Hurlemann, René, Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab122
_version_ 1784647054036828160
author Saporta, Nira
Peled-Avron, Leehe
Scheele, Dirk
Lieberz, Jana
Hurlemann, René
Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G
author_facet Saporta, Nira
Peled-Avron, Leehe
Scheele, Dirk
Lieberz, Jana
Hurlemann, René
Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G
author_sort Saporta, Nira
collection PubMed
description Lonely people often crave connectedness. However, they may also experience their environment as threatening, entering a self-preserving state that perpetuates loneliness. Research shows conflicting evidence about their response to positive social cues, and little is known about their experience of observed human touch. The right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) is part of an observation–execution network implicated in observed touch perception. Correlative studies also point to rIFG’s involvement in loneliness. We examined the causal effect of rIFG anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on high- and low-loneliness individuals observing human touch. In a cross-over design study, 40 participants watched pictures of humans or objects touching or not touching during anodal and sham stimulations. Participants indicated whether pictures contained humans or objects, and their reaction time was measured. Results show that the reaction time of low-loneliness individuals to observed human touch was significantly slower during anodal stimulation compared to high-loneliness individuals, possibly due to them being more emotionally distracted by it. Lonely individuals also reported less liking of touch. Our findings support the notion that lonely individuals are not drawn to positive social cues. This may help explain the perpetuation of loneliness, despite social opportunities that could be available to lonely people.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8824677
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88246772022-02-09 Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study Saporta, Nira Peled-Avron, Leehe Scheele, Dirk Lieberz, Jana Hurlemann, René Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Manuscript Lonely people often crave connectedness. However, they may also experience their environment as threatening, entering a self-preserving state that perpetuates loneliness. Research shows conflicting evidence about their response to positive social cues, and little is known about their experience of observed human touch. The right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) is part of an observation–execution network implicated in observed touch perception. Correlative studies also point to rIFG’s involvement in loneliness. We examined the causal effect of rIFG anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on high- and low-loneliness individuals observing human touch. In a cross-over design study, 40 participants watched pictures of humans or objects touching or not touching during anodal and sham stimulations. Participants indicated whether pictures contained humans or objects, and their reaction time was measured. Results show that the reaction time of low-loneliness individuals to observed human touch was significantly slower during anodal stimulation compared to high-loneliness individuals, possibly due to them being more emotionally distracted by it. Lonely individuals also reported less liking of touch. Our findings support the notion that lonely individuals are not drawn to positive social cues. This may help explain the perpetuation of loneliness, despite social opportunities that could be available to lonely people. Oxford University Press 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8824677/ /pubmed/34907421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab122 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Saporta, Nira
Peled-Avron, Leehe
Scheele, Dirk
Lieberz, Jana
Hurlemann, René
Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G
Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study
title Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study
title_full Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study
title_fullStr Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study
title_full_unstemmed Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study
title_short Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study
title_sort touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tdcs study
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824677/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907421
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab122
work_keys_str_mv AT saportanira touchedbylonelinesshowlonelinessimpactstheresponsetoobservedhumantouchatdcsstudy
AT peledavronleehe touchedbylonelinesshowlonelinessimpactstheresponsetoobservedhumantouchatdcsstudy
AT scheeledirk touchedbylonelinesshowlonelinessimpactstheresponsetoobservedhumantouchatdcsstudy
AT lieberzjana touchedbylonelinesshowlonelinessimpactstheresponsetoobservedhumantouchatdcsstudy
AT hurlemannrene touchedbylonelinesshowlonelinessimpactstheresponsetoobservedhumantouchatdcsstudy
AT shamaytsoorysimoneg touchedbylonelinesshowlonelinessimpactstheresponsetoobservedhumantouchatdcsstudy