Cargando…
Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study
Lonely people often crave connectedness. However, they may also experience their environment as threatening, entering a self-preserving state that perpetuates loneliness. Research shows conflicting evidence about their response to positive social cues, and little is known about their experience of o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab122 |
_version_ | 1784647054036828160 |
---|---|
author | Saporta, Nira Peled-Avron, Leehe Scheele, Dirk Lieberz, Jana Hurlemann, René Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G |
author_facet | Saporta, Nira Peled-Avron, Leehe Scheele, Dirk Lieberz, Jana Hurlemann, René Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G |
author_sort | Saporta, Nira |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lonely people often crave connectedness. However, they may also experience their environment as threatening, entering a self-preserving state that perpetuates loneliness. Research shows conflicting evidence about their response to positive social cues, and little is known about their experience of observed human touch. The right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) is part of an observation–execution network implicated in observed touch perception. Correlative studies also point to rIFG’s involvement in loneliness. We examined the causal effect of rIFG anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on high- and low-loneliness individuals observing human touch. In a cross-over design study, 40 participants watched pictures of humans or objects touching or not touching during anodal and sham stimulations. Participants indicated whether pictures contained humans or objects, and their reaction time was measured. Results show that the reaction time of low-loneliness individuals to observed human touch was significantly slower during anodal stimulation compared to high-loneliness individuals, possibly due to them being more emotionally distracted by it. Lonely individuals also reported less liking of touch. Our findings support the notion that lonely individuals are not drawn to positive social cues. This may help explain the perpetuation of loneliness, despite social opportunities that could be available to lonely people. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8824677 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88246772022-02-09 Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study Saporta, Nira Peled-Avron, Leehe Scheele, Dirk Lieberz, Jana Hurlemann, René Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Manuscript Lonely people often crave connectedness. However, they may also experience their environment as threatening, entering a self-preserving state that perpetuates loneliness. Research shows conflicting evidence about their response to positive social cues, and little is known about their experience of observed human touch. The right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) is part of an observation–execution network implicated in observed touch perception. Correlative studies also point to rIFG’s involvement in loneliness. We examined the causal effect of rIFG anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on high- and low-loneliness individuals observing human touch. In a cross-over design study, 40 participants watched pictures of humans or objects touching or not touching during anodal and sham stimulations. Participants indicated whether pictures contained humans or objects, and their reaction time was measured. Results show that the reaction time of low-loneliness individuals to observed human touch was significantly slower during anodal stimulation compared to high-loneliness individuals, possibly due to them being more emotionally distracted by it. Lonely individuals also reported less liking of touch. Our findings support the notion that lonely individuals are not drawn to positive social cues. This may help explain the perpetuation of loneliness, despite social opportunities that could be available to lonely people. Oxford University Press 2021-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8824677/ /pubmed/34907421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab122 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Manuscript Saporta, Nira Peled-Avron, Leehe Scheele, Dirk Lieberz, Jana Hurlemann, René Shamay-Tsoory, Simone G Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study |
title | Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study |
title_full | Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study |
title_fullStr | Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study |
title_full_unstemmed | Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study |
title_short | Touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tDCS study |
title_sort | touched by loneliness—how loneliness impacts the response to observed human touch: a tdcs study |
topic | Original Manuscript |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824677/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34907421 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saportanira touchedbylonelinesshowlonelinessimpactstheresponsetoobservedhumantouchatdcsstudy AT peledavronleehe touchedbylonelinesshowlonelinessimpactstheresponsetoobservedhumantouchatdcsstudy AT scheeledirk touchedbylonelinesshowlonelinessimpactstheresponsetoobservedhumantouchatdcsstudy AT lieberzjana touchedbylonelinesshowlonelinessimpactstheresponsetoobservedhumantouchatdcsstudy AT hurlemannrene touchedbylonelinesshowlonelinessimpactstheresponsetoobservedhumantouchatdcsstudy AT shamaytsoorysimoneg touchedbylonelinesshowlonelinessimpactstheresponsetoobservedhumantouchatdcsstudy |