Cargando…
tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review
Previous studies have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could potentially promote prosocial behaviors. However, results from randomized controlled trials are inconsistent. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS using single-session p...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab067 |
_version_ | 1784647054269612032 |
---|---|
author | Yuan, Bo Tolomeo, Serenella Yang, Chunliang Wang, Ying Yu, Rongjun |
author_facet | Yuan, Bo Tolomeo, Serenella Yang, Chunliang Wang, Ying Yu, Rongjun |
author_sort | Yuan, Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous studies have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could potentially promote prosocial behaviors. However, results from randomized controlled trials are inconsistent. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS using single-session protocols on prosocial behaviors in healthy young adults and explore potential moderators of these effects. The results showed that compared with sham stimulation, anodal (excitatory) stimulation significantly increased (g = 0.27, 95% CI [0.11, 0.43], Z = 3.30, P = 0.001) and cathodal (inhibitory) stimulation significantly decreased prosocial behaviors (g = −0.19, 95% CI [−0.39, −0.01], Z = −1.95, P = 0.051) using a multilevel meta-analytic model. These effects were not significantly modulated by stimulation parameters (e.g. duration, intensity and site) and types of prosocial behavior. The risk of publication bias for the included effects was minimal, and no selective reporting (e.g. P-hacking) was found in the P-curve analysis. This meta-analysis showed that both anodal and cathodal tDCS have small but significant effects on prosocial behaviors. The current study provides evidence that prosocial behaviors are linked to the activity of the ‘social brain’. Future studies are encouraged to further explore whether tDCS could effectively treat social dysfunctions in psychiatry disorders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8824678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88246782022-02-09 tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review Yuan, Bo Tolomeo, Serenella Yang, Chunliang Wang, Ying Yu, Rongjun Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Manuscript Previous studies have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could potentially promote prosocial behaviors. However, results from randomized controlled trials are inconsistent. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS using single-session protocols on prosocial behaviors in healthy young adults and explore potential moderators of these effects. The results showed that compared with sham stimulation, anodal (excitatory) stimulation significantly increased (g = 0.27, 95% CI [0.11, 0.43], Z = 3.30, P = 0.001) and cathodal (inhibitory) stimulation significantly decreased prosocial behaviors (g = −0.19, 95% CI [−0.39, −0.01], Z = −1.95, P = 0.051) using a multilevel meta-analytic model. These effects were not significantly modulated by stimulation parameters (e.g. duration, intensity and site) and types of prosocial behavior. The risk of publication bias for the included effects was minimal, and no selective reporting (e.g. P-hacking) was found in the P-curve analysis. This meta-analysis showed that both anodal and cathodal tDCS have small but significant effects on prosocial behaviors. The current study provides evidence that prosocial behaviors are linked to the activity of the ‘social brain’. Future studies are encouraged to further explore whether tDCS could effectively treat social dysfunctions in psychiatry disorders. Oxford University Press 2021-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8824678/ /pubmed/34027543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab067 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Manuscript Yuan, Bo Tolomeo, Serenella Yang, Chunliang Wang, Ying Yu, Rongjun tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review |
title | tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review |
title_full | tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review |
title_fullStr | tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review |
title_full_unstemmed | tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review |
title_short | tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review |
title_sort | tdcs effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review |
topic | Original Manuscript |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab067 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuanbo tdcseffectonprosocialbehaviorametaanalyticreview AT tolomeoserenella tdcseffectonprosocialbehaviorametaanalyticreview AT yangchunliang tdcseffectonprosocialbehaviorametaanalyticreview AT wangying tdcseffectonprosocialbehaviorametaanalyticreview AT yurongjun tdcseffectonprosocialbehaviorametaanalyticreview |