Cargando…

tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review

Previous studies have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could potentially promote prosocial behaviors. However, results from randomized controlled trials are inconsistent. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS using single-session p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Bo, Tolomeo, Serenella, Yang, Chunliang, Wang, Ying, Yu, Rongjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab067
_version_ 1784647054269612032
author Yuan, Bo
Tolomeo, Serenella
Yang, Chunliang
Wang, Ying
Yu, Rongjun
author_facet Yuan, Bo
Tolomeo, Serenella
Yang, Chunliang
Wang, Ying
Yu, Rongjun
author_sort Yuan, Bo
collection PubMed
description Previous studies have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could potentially promote prosocial behaviors. However, results from randomized controlled trials are inconsistent. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS using single-session protocols on prosocial behaviors in healthy young adults and explore potential moderators of these effects. The results showed that compared with sham stimulation, anodal (excitatory) stimulation significantly increased (g = 0.27, 95% CI [0.11, 0.43], Z = 3.30, P = 0.001) and cathodal (inhibitory) stimulation significantly decreased prosocial behaviors (g = −0.19, 95% CI [−0.39, −0.01], Z = −1.95, P = 0.051) using a multilevel meta-analytic model. These effects were not significantly modulated by stimulation parameters (e.g. duration, intensity and site) and types of prosocial behavior. The risk of publication bias for the included effects was minimal, and no selective reporting (e.g. P-hacking) was found in the P-curve analysis. This meta-analysis showed that both anodal and cathodal tDCS have small but significant effects on prosocial behaviors. The current study provides evidence that prosocial behaviors are linked to the activity of the ‘social brain’. Future studies are encouraged to further explore whether tDCS could effectively treat social dysfunctions in psychiatry disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8824678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88246782022-02-09 tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review Yuan, Bo Tolomeo, Serenella Yang, Chunliang Wang, Ying Yu, Rongjun Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Manuscript Previous studies have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could potentially promote prosocial behaviors. However, results from randomized controlled trials are inconsistent. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS using single-session protocols on prosocial behaviors in healthy young adults and explore potential moderators of these effects. The results showed that compared with sham stimulation, anodal (excitatory) stimulation significantly increased (g = 0.27, 95% CI [0.11, 0.43], Z = 3.30, P = 0.001) and cathodal (inhibitory) stimulation significantly decreased prosocial behaviors (g = −0.19, 95% CI [−0.39, −0.01], Z = −1.95, P = 0.051) using a multilevel meta-analytic model. These effects were not significantly modulated by stimulation parameters (e.g. duration, intensity and site) and types of prosocial behavior. The risk of publication bias for the included effects was minimal, and no selective reporting (e.g. P-hacking) was found in the P-curve analysis. This meta-analysis showed that both anodal and cathodal tDCS have small but significant effects on prosocial behaviors. The current study provides evidence that prosocial behaviors are linked to the activity of the ‘social brain’. Future studies are encouraged to further explore whether tDCS could effectively treat social dysfunctions in psychiatry disorders. Oxford University Press 2021-06-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8824678/ /pubmed/34027543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab067 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Yuan, Bo
Tolomeo, Serenella
Yang, Chunliang
Wang, Ying
Yu, Rongjun
tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review
title tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review
title_full tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review
title_fullStr tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review
title_full_unstemmed tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review
title_short tDCS effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review
title_sort tdcs effect on prosocial behavior: a meta-analytic review
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34027543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsab067
work_keys_str_mv AT yuanbo tdcseffectonprosocialbehaviorametaanalyticreview
AT tolomeoserenella tdcseffectonprosocialbehaviorametaanalyticreview
AT yangchunliang tdcseffectonprosocialbehaviorametaanalyticreview
AT wangying tdcseffectonprosocialbehaviorametaanalyticreview
AT yurongjun tdcseffectonprosocialbehaviorametaanalyticreview