Cargando…
A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire
BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread availability of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States, many that have chosen not to be vaccinated have done so because of vaccine hesitancy. This highlights the need for tools that accurately capture the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs towards COVID-19 vaccines,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101040 |
_version_ | 1784647061043412992 |
---|---|
author | Habila, Magdiel A. Valencia, Dora Y. Khan, Sana M. Heslin, Kelly M. Hoskinson, Joshua Ernst, Kacey C. Pogreba-Brown, Kristen Jacobs, Elizabeth T. Cordova-Marks, Felina M. Warholak, Terri |
author_facet | Habila, Magdiel A. Valencia, Dora Y. Khan, Sana M. Heslin, Kelly M. Hoskinson, Joshua Ernst, Kacey C. Pogreba-Brown, Kristen Jacobs, Elizabeth T. Cordova-Marks, Felina M. Warholak, Terri |
author_sort | Habila, Magdiel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread availability of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States, many that have chosen not to be vaccinated have done so because of vaccine hesitancy. This highlights the need for tools that accurately capture the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs towards COVID-19 vaccines, and provide steps toward improving vaccine acceptance. METHODS: Participants of the Arizona CoVHORT (COVID-19 Cohort) received a one-time, electronic based cross-sectional questionnaire intended to capture underlying motivations regarding vaccination, as well as hesitations that may prevent people from getting vaccinated. Rasch analysis was conducted among 4703 CoVHORT participants who had completed the vaccine questionnaire to assess questionnaire reliability and validity. Response categories were grouped to optimize scale functioning and to ensure independent probabilities of participant endorsement. RESULTS: A total of 4703 CoVHORT participants completed the questionnaire, of whom 68% were female, and who had a mean age of 48 years. Participants were primarily White (90%), highly educated (63% with a college degree or above, with most respondents (45%) having an income of more than $75,000 per annum. The results indicated the questionnaire has good reliability and construct validity for assessing attitudes and beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccines. In-fit mean-squares for included items ranged from 0.61 to 1.72 and outfit mean-squares ranged from 0.56 to 1.75, and correlation coefficients ranged from 0.25 to 0.75. The person-item map indicated normal distribution of logit scores measuring perceptions about COVID-19 vaccinations. CONCLUSIONS: The CoVHORT vaccine questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory reliability and construct validity in assessing attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines. Overall results provide a starting point for a reliable and valid tool to assess knowledge and perceptions about COVID-19 vaccination, ultimately providing public health professionals with an instrument to assess the factors that are associated with vaccine acceptance or hesitancy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8824717 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88247172022-02-09 A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire Habila, Magdiel A. Valencia, Dora Y. Khan, Sana M. Heslin, Kelly M. Hoskinson, Joshua Ernst, Kacey C. Pogreba-Brown, Kristen Jacobs, Elizabeth T. Cordova-Marks, Felina M. Warholak, Terri SSM Popul Health Article BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread availability of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States, many that have chosen not to be vaccinated have done so because of vaccine hesitancy. This highlights the need for tools that accurately capture the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs towards COVID-19 vaccines, and provide steps toward improving vaccine acceptance. METHODS: Participants of the Arizona CoVHORT (COVID-19 Cohort) received a one-time, electronic based cross-sectional questionnaire intended to capture underlying motivations regarding vaccination, as well as hesitations that may prevent people from getting vaccinated. Rasch analysis was conducted among 4703 CoVHORT participants who had completed the vaccine questionnaire to assess questionnaire reliability and validity. Response categories were grouped to optimize scale functioning and to ensure independent probabilities of participant endorsement. RESULTS: A total of 4703 CoVHORT participants completed the questionnaire, of whom 68% were female, and who had a mean age of 48 years. Participants were primarily White (90%), highly educated (63% with a college degree or above, with most respondents (45%) having an income of more than $75,000 per annum. The results indicated the questionnaire has good reliability and construct validity for assessing attitudes and beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccines. In-fit mean-squares for included items ranged from 0.61 to 1.72 and outfit mean-squares ranged from 0.56 to 1.75, and correlation coefficients ranged from 0.25 to 0.75. The person-item map indicated normal distribution of logit scores measuring perceptions about COVID-19 vaccinations. CONCLUSIONS: The CoVHORT vaccine questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory reliability and construct validity in assessing attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines. Overall results provide a starting point for a reliable and valid tool to assess knowledge and perceptions about COVID-19 vaccination, ultimately providing public health professionals with an instrument to assess the factors that are associated with vaccine acceptance or hesitancy. Elsevier 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8824717/ /pubmed/35155727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101040 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Habila, Magdiel A. Valencia, Dora Y. Khan, Sana M. Heslin, Kelly M. Hoskinson, Joshua Ernst, Kacey C. Pogreba-Brown, Kristen Jacobs, Elizabeth T. Cordova-Marks, Felina M. Warholak, Terri A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire |
title | A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire |
title_full | A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire |
title_fullStr | A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire |
title_short | A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire |
title_sort | rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the arizona covhort covid-19 vaccine questionnaire |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824717/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101040 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT habilamagdiela araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT valenciadoray araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT khansanam araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT heslinkellym araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT hoskinsonjoshua araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT ernstkaceyc araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT pogrebabrownkristen araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT jacobselizabetht araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT cordovamarksfelinam araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT warholakterri araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT habilamagdiela raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT valenciadoray raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT khansanam raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT heslinkellym raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT hoskinsonjoshua raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT ernstkaceyc raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT pogrebabrownkristen raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT jacobselizabetht raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT cordovamarksfelinam raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire AT warholakterri raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire |