Cargando…

A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread availability of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States, many that have chosen not to be vaccinated have done so because of vaccine hesitancy. This highlights the need for tools that accurately capture the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs towards COVID-19 vaccines,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Habila, Magdiel A., Valencia, Dora Y., Khan, Sana M., Heslin, Kelly M., Hoskinson, Joshua, Ernst, Kacey C., Pogreba-Brown, Kristen, Jacobs, Elizabeth T., Cordova-Marks, Felina M., Warholak, Terri
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101040
_version_ 1784647061043412992
author Habila, Magdiel A.
Valencia, Dora Y.
Khan, Sana M.
Heslin, Kelly M.
Hoskinson, Joshua
Ernst, Kacey C.
Pogreba-Brown, Kristen
Jacobs, Elizabeth T.
Cordova-Marks, Felina M.
Warholak, Terri
author_facet Habila, Magdiel A.
Valencia, Dora Y.
Khan, Sana M.
Heslin, Kelly M.
Hoskinson, Joshua
Ernst, Kacey C.
Pogreba-Brown, Kristen
Jacobs, Elizabeth T.
Cordova-Marks, Felina M.
Warholak, Terri
author_sort Habila, Magdiel A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread availability of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States, many that have chosen not to be vaccinated have done so because of vaccine hesitancy. This highlights the need for tools that accurately capture the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs towards COVID-19 vaccines, and provide steps toward improving vaccine acceptance. METHODS: Participants of the Arizona CoVHORT (COVID-19 Cohort) received a one-time, electronic based cross-sectional questionnaire intended to capture underlying motivations regarding vaccination, as well as hesitations that may prevent people from getting vaccinated. Rasch analysis was conducted among 4703 CoVHORT participants who had completed the vaccine questionnaire to assess questionnaire reliability and validity. Response categories were grouped to optimize scale functioning and to ensure independent probabilities of participant endorsement. RESULTS: A total of 4703 CoVHORT participants completed the questionnaire, of whom 68% were female, and who had a mean age of 48 years. Participants were primarily White (90%), highly educated (63% with a college degree or above, with most respondents (45%) having an income of more than $75,000 per annum. The results indicated the questionnaire has good reliability and construct validity for assessing attitudes and beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccines. In-fit mean-squares for included items ranged from 0.61 to 1.72 and outfit mean-squares ranged from 0.56 to 1.75, and correlation coefficients ranged from 0.25 to 0.75. The person-item map indicated normal distribution of logit scores measuring perceptions about COVID-19 vaccinations. CONCLUSIONS: The CoVHORT vaccine questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory reliability and construct validity in assessing attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines. Overall results provide a starting point for a reliable and valid tool to assess knowledge and perceptions about COVID-19 vaccination, ultimately providing public health professionals with an instrument to assess the factors that are associated with vaccine acceptance or hesitancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8824717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88247172022-02-09 A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire Habila, Magdiel A. Valencia, Dora Y. Khan, Sana M. Heslin, Kelly M. Hoskinson, Joshua Ernst, Kacey C. Pogreba-Brown, Kristen Jacobs, Elizabeth T. Cordova-Marks, Felina M. Warholak, Terri SSM Popul Health Article BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread availability of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States, many that have chosen not to be vaccinated have done so because of vaccine hesitancy. This highlights the need for tools that accurately capture the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs towards COVID-19 vaccines, and provide steps toward improving vaccine acceptance. METHODS: Participants of the Arizona CoVHORT (COVID-19 Cohort) received a one-time, electronic based cross-sectional questionnaire intended to capture underlying motivations regarding vaccination, as well as hesitations that may prevent people from getting vaccinated. Rasch analysis was conducted among 4703 CoVHORT participants who had completed the vaccine questionnaire to assess questionnaire reliability and validity. Response categories were grouped to optimize scale functioning and to ensure independent probabilities of participant endorsement. RESULTS: A total of 4703 CoVHORT participants completed the questionnaire, of whom 68% were female, and who had a mean age of 48 years. Participants were primarily White (90%), highly educated (63% with a college degree or above, with most respondents (45%) having an income of more than $75,000 per annum. The results indicated the questionnaire has good reliability and construct validity for assessing attitudes and beliefs about the COVID-19 vaccines. In-fit mean-squares for included items ranged from 0.61 to 1.72 and outfit mean-squares ranged from 0.56 to 1.75, and correlation coefficients ranged from 0.25 to 0.75. The person-item map indicated normal distribution of logit scores measuring perceptions about COVID-19 vaccinations. CONCLUSIONS: The CoVHORT vaccine questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory reliability and construct validity in assessing attitudes and beliefs about COVID-19 vaccines. Overall results provide a starting point for a reliable and valid tool to assess knowledge and perceptions about COVID-19 vaccination, ultimately providing public health professionals with an instrument to assess the factors that are associated with vaccine acceptance or hesitancy. Elsevier 2022-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8824717/ /pubmed/35155727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101040 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Habila, Magdiel A.
Valencia, Dora Y.
Khan, Sana M.
Heslin, Kelly M.
Hoskinson, Joshua
Ernst, Kacey C.
Pogreba-Brown, Kristen
Jacobs, Elizabeth T.
Cordova-Marks, Felina M.
Warholak, Terri
A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire
title A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire
title_full A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire
title_fullStr A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire
title_short A Rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the Arizona CoVHORT COVID-19 vaccine questionnaire
title_sort rasch analysis assessing the reliability and validity of the arizona covhort covid-19 vaccine questionnaire
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35155727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101040
work_keys_str_mv AT habilamagdiela araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT valenciadoray araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT khansanam araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT heslinkellym araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT hoskinsonjoshua araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT ernstkaceyc araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT pogrebabrownkristen araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT jacobselizabetht araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT cordovamarksfelinam araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT warholakterri araschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT habilamagdiela raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT valenciadoray raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT khansanam raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT heslinkellym raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT hoskinsonjoshua raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT ernstkaceyc raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT pogrebabrownkristen raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT jacobselizabetht raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT cordovamarksfelinam raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire
AT warholakterri raschanalysisassessingthereliabilityandvalidityofthearizonacovhortcovid19vaccinequestionnaire