Cargando…

A systematic approach for successful repair of radiated and non-radiated ureteral injuries

BACKGROUND: Successful ureteral reconstruction is challenging, particularly in radiated fields. We characterize and directly compare surgical outcomes in modern cohorts of radiated and non-radiated patients undergoing ureteral reconstruction utilizing a systematic approach to pre-operative assessmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Grimes, Matthew D., Schubbe, Morgan E., Erickson, Bradley A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242639
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-574
_version_ 1784647081487499264
author Grimes, Matthew D.
Schubbe, Morgan E.
Erickson, Bradley A.
author_facet Grimes, Matthew D.
Schubbe, Morgan E.
Erickson, Bradley A.
author_sort Grimes, Matthew D.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Successful ureteral reconstruction is challenging, particularly in radiated fields. We characterize and directly compare surgical outcomes in modern cohorts of radiated and non-radiated patients undergoing ureteral reconstruction utilizing a systematic approach to pre-operative assessment. We hypothesize that radiated patients will undergo more complex ureteral reconstructions and experience higher rates of surgical failure and complications compared to nonradiated patients. METHODS: Consecutive cases of ureteral reconstruction for acquired ureteral injury performed by a single surgeon from 2010–2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data were collected including pre-operative bladder capacity, ureteral injury characteristics, and surgical technique. Ileal ureter and autotransplantation were classified as “complex” ureteral repairs, and surgical success was defined as freedom from surgical revision of the ureteral anastomosis and/or ureteral stenting. RESULTS: There were 47 ureteral reconstructions performed including 17 (36%) radiated patients. Radiated patients had lower pre-operative bladder capacity and were more likely to undergo complex repairs compared to non-radiated patients (35% vs. 7%, P=0.01). Overall surgical success was high (98%) and similar between radiated (94%) and non-radiated groups (100%) at median follow up of 30 months. Clavien grade 3–4 complications occurred in 18% of radiated and 10% of non-radiated patients (P=0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Careful pre-operative evaluation and appropriate selection of surgical technique facilitates high and similar success of ureteral reconstruction in radiated and non-radiated patients. Complex ureteral repairs were more common in radiated patients, however the majority of radiated ureteral injuries (65%) were reconstructed without tissue transfer. Radiated patients had lower pre-operative bladder capacities, but similar surgical morbidity, renal function, and persistent urge incontinence compared to non-radiated patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8824819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88248192022-03-02 A systematic approach for successful repair of radiated and non-radiated ureteral injuries Grimes, Matthew D. Schubbe, Morgan E. Erickson, Bradley A. Transl Androl Urol Original Article BACKGROUND: Successful ureteral reconstruction is challenging, particularly in radiated fields. We characterize and directly compare surgical outcomes in modern cohorts of radiated and non-radiated patients undergoing ureteral reconstruction utilizing a systematic approach to pre-operative assessment. We hypothesize that radiated patients will undergo more complex ureteral reconstructions and experience higher rates of surgical failure and complications compared to nonradiated patients. METHODS: Consecutive cases of ureteral reconstruction for acquired ureteral injury performed by a single surgeon from 2010–2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical data were collected including pre-operative bladder capacity, ureteral injury characteristics, and surgical technique. Ileal ureter and autotransplantation were classified as “complex” ureteral repairs, and surgical success was defined as freedom from surgical revision of the ureteral anastomosis and/or ureteral stenting. RESULTS: There were 47 ureteral reconstructions performed including 17 (36%) radiated patients. Radiated patients had lower pre-operative bladder capacity and were more likely to undergo complex repairs compared to non-radiated patients (35% vs. 7%, P=0.01). Overall surgical success was high (98%) and similar between radiated (94%) and non-radiated groups (100%) at median follow up of 30 months. Clavien grade 3–4 complications occurred in 18% of radiated and 10% of non-radiated patients (P=0.48). CONCLUSIONS: Careful pre-operative evaluation and appropriate selection of surgical technique facilitates high and similar success of ureteral reconstruction in radiated and non-radiated patients. Complex ureteral repairs were more common in radiated patients, however the majority of radiated ureteral injuries (65%) were reconstructed without tissue transfer. Radiated patients had lower pre-operative bladder capacities, but similar surgical morbidity, renal function, and persistent urge incontinence compared to non-radiated patients. AME Publishing Company 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8824819/ /pubmed/35242639 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-574 Text en 2022 Translational Andrology and Urology. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Grimes, Matthew D.
Schubbe, Morgan E.
Erickson, Bradley A.
A systematic approach for successful repair of radiated and non-radiated ureteral injuries
title A systematic approach for successful repair of radiated and non-radiated ureteral injuries
title_full A systematic approach for successful repair of radiated and non-radiated ureteral injuries
title_fullStr A systematic approach for successful repair of radiated and non-radiated ureteral injuries
title_full_unstemmed A systematic approach for successful repair of radiated and non-radiated ureteral injuries
title_short A systematic approach for successful repair of radiated and non-radiated ureteral injuries
title_sort systematic approach for successful repair of radiated and non-radiated ureteral injuries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242639
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tau-21-574
work_keys_str_mv AT grimesmatthewd asystematicapproachforsuccessfulrepairofradiatedandnonradiatedureteralinjuries
AT schubbemorgane asystematicapproachforsuccessfulrepairofradiatedandnonradiatedureteralinjuries
AT ericksonbradleya asystematicapproachforsuccessfulrepairofradiatedandnonradiatedureteralinjuries
AT grimesmatthewd systematicapproachforsuccessfulrepairofradiatedandnonradiatedureteralinjuries
AT schubbemorgane systematicapproachforsuccessfulrepairofradiatedandnonradiatedureteralinjuries
AT ericksonbradleya systematicapproachforsuccessfulrepairofradiatedandnonradiatedureteralinjuries