Cargando…

Liquid Biopsy and Tissue Biopsy Comparison with Digital PCR and IHC/FISH for HER2 Amplification Detection in Breast Cancer Patients

Two hundred twenty-four breast cancer patients with paired tissue and plasma samples were enrolled from 3 clinical centers to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of a digital PCR HER2 amplification assay. All patients were histologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced and recurrent or meta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Suhong, Wang, Yan, Gong, Zhiyun, Li, Yuan, Yang, Wentao, Liu, Guangyu, Li, Jianwei, Hu, Xin, Wang, Yanchun, Tong, Yin, Yuan, Peng, Si, Yiran, Kang, Yikun, Mao, Yong, Qi, Xiaowei, Liu, Yankui, Ou, Jiajia, Li, Zhaoliang, Pan, Xin, Lv, Zhaoqing, Kaji, Kavanaugh, Guo, Lin, Lu, Renquan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ivyspring International Publisher 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35154443
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.66567
_version_ 1784647098538393600
author Xie, Suhong
Wang, Yan
Gong, Zhiyun
Li, Yuan
Yang, Wentao
Liu, Guangyu
Li, Jianwei
Hu, Xin
Wang, Yanchun
Tong, Yin
Yuan, Peng
Si, Yiran
Kang, Yikun
Mao, Yong
Qi, Xiaowei
Liu, Yankui
Ou, Jiajia
Li, Zhaoliang
Pan, Xin
Lv, Zhaoqing
Kaji, Kavanaugh
Guo, Lin
Lu, Renquan
author_facet Xie, Suhong
Wang, Yan
Gong, Zhiyun
Li, Yuan
Yang, Wentao
Liu, Guangyu
Li, Jianwei
Hu, Xin
Wang, Yanchun
Tong, Yin
Yuan, Peng
Si, Yiran
Kang, Yikun
Mao, Yong
Qi, Xiaowei
Liu, Yankui
Ou, Jiajia
Li, Zhaoliang
Pan, Xin
Lv, Zhaoqing
Kaji, Kavanaugh
Guo, Lin
Lu, Renquan
author_sort Xie, Suhong
collection PubMed
description Two hundred twenty-four breast cancer patients with paired tissue and plasma samples were enrolled from 3 clinical centers to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of a digital PCR HER2 amplification assay. All patients were histologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced and recurrent or metastatic breast cancer with stage III/IV and had tissue HER2 status determinations using IHC/FISH. For the whole 224 advanced breast cancer patients, the sensitivity between dPCR in plasma and IHC/FISH in tissue samples is 43.75% (42/96), the specificity is 84.38% (108/128) and the overall concordance is 66.96% (150/224). Interestingly, when we looked at stage III, stage IV and recurrent or metastatic breast cancer separately, compared with IHC/FISH in tissue samples, the sensitivity of dPCR in plasma increases from 37.93% (11/29) for stage III to 41.67% (15/36) for stage IV cancer. Recurrent breast cancer patient had an increased sensitivity of 51.61% (16/31). This is consistent with our expectation sensitivity would increase concordantly as tumor burden goes up. On the other hand, specificity decreased from 92.68% (38/41) for stage III to 86.44% (51/59) for stage IV cancer. Recurrent breast cancer patient had a specificity of only 67.86% (19/28). This is, in part, due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Many patients determined to be negative for HER2 amplification in tissue biopsy could have HER2 positive tumors at other sites, which was detected by the liquid biopsy. This study suggested the necessity of liquid biopsy for HER2 amplification detection and demonstrated digital PCR can be used as a companion diagnostic tool to determine HER2 amplification status. It also suggested that a liquid biopsy should follow a negative result from tissue biopsy to avoid false negative results especially for late-stage breast cancer patients and ones who experienced relapse or became resistant to current therapy. Future studies should focus on therapeutic effects on patients determined to be HER2 positive through liquid biopsy and collecting additional tissue biopsies to identify HER2 positive tumor when the original tissue biopsy and liquid biopsy don't agree.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8824896
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Ivyspring International Publisher
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88248962022-02-11 Liquid Biopsy and Tissue Biopsy Comparison with Digital PCR and IHC/FISH for HER2 Amplification Detection in Breast Cancer Patients Xie, Suhong Wang, Yan Gong, Zhiyun Li, Yuan Yang, Wentao Liu, Guangyu Li, Jianwei Hu, Xin Wang, Yanchun Tong, Yin Yuan, Peng Si, Yiran Kang, Yikun Mao, Yong Qi, Xiaowei Liu, Yankui Ou, Jiajia Li, Zhaoliang Pan, Xin Lv, Zhaoqing Kaji, Kavanaugh Guo, Lin Lu, Renquan J Cancer Research Paper Two hundred twenty-four breast cancer patients with paired tissue and plasma samples were enrolled from 3 clinical centers to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of a digital PCR HER2 amplification assay. All patients were histologically confirmed diagnosis of locally advanced and recurrent or metastatic breast cancer with stage III/IV and had tissue HER2 status determinations using IHC/FISH. For the whole 224 advanced breast cancer patients, the sensitivity between dPCR in plasma and IHC/FISH in tissue samples is 43.75% (42/96), the specificity is 84.38% (108/128) and the overall concordance is 66.96% (150/224). Interestingly, when we looked at stage III, stage IV and recurrent or metastatic breast cancer separately, compared with IHC/FISH in tissue samples, the sensitivity of dPCR in plasma increases from 37.93% (11/29) for stage III to 41.67% (15/36) for stage IV cancer. Recurrent breast cancer patient had an increased sensitivity of 51.61% (16/31). This is consistent with our expectation sensitivity would increase concordantly as tumor burden goes up. On the other hand, specificity decreased from 92.68% (38/41) for stage III to 86.44% (51/59) for stage IV cancer. Recurrent breast cancer patient had a specificity of only 67.86% (19/28). This is, in part, due to inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. Many patients determined to be negative for HER2 amplification in tissue biopsy could have HER2 positive tumors at other sites, which was detected by the liquid biopsy. This study suggested the necessity of liquid biopsy for HER2 amplification detection and demonstrated digital PCR can be used as a companion diagnostic tool to determine HER2 amplification status. It also suggested that a liquid biopsy should follow a negative result from tissue biopsy to avoid false negative results especially for late-stage breast cancer patients and ones who experienced relapse or became resistant to current therapy. Future studies should focus on therapeutic effects on patients determined to be HER2 positive through liquid biopsy and collecting additional tissue biopsies to identify HER2 positive tumor when the original tissue biopsy and liquid biopsy don't agree. Ivyspring International Publisher 2022-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8824896/ /pubmed/35154443 http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.66567 Text en © The author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). See http://ivyspring.com/terms for full terms and conditions.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Xie, Suhong
Wang, Yan
Gong, Zhiyun
Li, Yuan
Yang, Wentao
Liu, Guangyu
Li, Jianwei
Hu, Xin
Wang, Yanchun
Tong, Yin
Yuan, Peng
Si, Yiran
Kang, Yikun
Mao, Yong
Qi, Xiaowei
Liu, Yankui
Ou, Jiajia
Li, Zhaoliang
Pan, Xin
Lv, Zhaoqing
Kaji, Kavanaugh
Guo, Lin
Lu, Renquan
Liquid Biopsy and Tissue Biopsy Comparison with Digital PCR and IHC/FISH for HER2 Amplification Detection in Breast Cancer Patients
title Liquid Biopsy and Tissue Biopsy Comparison with Digital PCR and IHC/FISH for HER2 Amplification Detection in Breast Cancer Patients
title_full Liquid Biopsy and Tissue Biopsy Comparison with Digital PCR and IHC/FISH for HER2 Amplification Detection in Breast Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Liquid Biopsy and Tissue Biopsy Comparison with Digital PCR and IHC/FISH for HER2 Amplification Detection in Breast Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Liquid Biopsy and Tissue Biopsy Comparison with Digital PCR and IHC/FISH for HER2 Amplification Detection in Breast Cancer Patients
title_short Liquid Biopsy and Tissue Biopsy Comparison with Digital PCR and IHC/FISH for HER2 Amplification Detection in Breast Cancer Patients
title_sort liquid biopsy and tissue biopsy comparison with digital pcr and ihc/fish for her2 amplification detection in breast cancer patients
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8824896/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35154443
http://dx.doi.org/10.7150/jca.66567
work_keys_str_mv AT xiesuhong liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT wangyan liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT gongzhiyun liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT liyuan liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT yangwentao liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT liuguangyu liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT lijianwei liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT huxin liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT wangyanchun liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT tongyin liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT yuanpeng liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT siyiran liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT kangyikun liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT maoyong liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT qixiaowei liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT liuyankui liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT oujiajia liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT lizhaoliang liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT panxin liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT lvzhaoqing liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT kajikavanaugh liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT guolin liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients
AT lurenquan liquidbiopsyandtissuebiopsycomparisonwithdigitalpcrandihcfishforher2amplificationdetectioninbreastcancerpatients