Cargando…
mTICCS and its inter-rater reliability to predict the need for massive transfusion in severely injured patients
PURPOSE: The modified Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (mTICCS) presents a new scoring system for the early detection of the need for a massive transfusion (MT). This easily applicable score was validated in a large trauma cohort and proven comparable to more established complex scoring sy...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01523-w |
_version_ | 1784647202051719168 |
---|---|
author | Horst, Klemens Lichte, Philipp Bläsius, Felix Weber, Christian David Tonglet, Martin Kobbe, Philipp Heussen, Nicole Hildebrand, Frank |
author_facet | Horst, Klemens Lichte, Philipp Bläsius, Felix Weber, Christian David Tonglet, Martin Kobbe, Philipp Heussen, Nicole Hildebrand, Frank |
author_sort | Horst, Klemens |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The modified Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (mTICCS) presents a new scoring system for the early detection of the need for a massive transfusion (MT). This easily applicable score was validated in a large trauma cohort and proven comparable to more established complex scoring systems. However, the inter-rater reliability of the mTICCS has not yet been investigated. METHODS: Therefore, a dataset of 15 randomly selected and severely injured patients (ISS ≥ 16) derived from the database of a level I trauma centre (2010–2015) was used. Moreover, 15 severely injured subjects that received MT were chosen from the same databank. A web-based survey was sent to medical professionals working in the field of trauma care asking them to evaluate each patient using the mTICCS. RESULTS: In total, 16 raters (9 residents and 7 specialists) completed the survey. Ratings from 15 medical professionals could be evaluated and led to an ICC of 0.7587 (95% Bootstrap confidence interval (BCI) 0.7149–0.8283). A comparison of working experience specific ICC (n = 7 specialists, ICC: 0.7558, BCI: 0.7076–0.8270; n = 8 residents, ICC: 0.7634, BCI: 0.7183–0.8335) showed no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: In summary, reliability values need to be considered when making clinical decisions based on scoring systems. Due to its easy applicability and its almost perfect inter-rater reliability, even with non-specialists, the mTICCS might therefore be a useful tool to predict the early need for MT in multiple trauma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8825405 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88254052022-02-22 mTICCS and its inter-rater reliability to predict the need for massive transfusion in severely injured patients Horst, Klemens Lichte, Philipp Bläsius, Felix Weber, Christian David Tonglet, Martin Kobbe, Philipp Heussen, Nicole Hildebrand, Frank Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: The modified Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy Clinical Score (mTICCS) presents a new scoring system for the early detection of the need for a massive transfusion (MT). This easily applicable score was validated in a large trauma cohort and proven comparable to more established complex scoring systems. However, the inter-rater reliability of the mTICCS has not yet been investigated. METHODS: Therefore, a dataset of 15 randomly selected and severely injured patients (ISS ≥ 16) derived from the database of a level I trauma centre (2010–2015) was used. Moreover, 15 severely injured subjects that received MT were chosen from the same databank. A web-based survey was sent to medical professionals working in the field of trauma care asking them to evaluate each patient using the mTICCS. RESULTS: In total, 16 raters (9 residents and 7 specialists) completed the survey. Ratings from 15 medical professionals could be evaluated and led to an ICC of 0.7587 (95% Bootstrap confidence interval (BCI) 0.7149–0.8283). A comparison of working experience specific ICC (n = 7 specialists, ICC: 0.7558, BCI: 0.7076–0.8270; n = 8 residents, ICC: 0.7634, BCI: 0.7183–0.8335) showed no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.67). CONCLUSION: In summary, reliability values need to be considered when making clinical decisions based on scoring systems. Due to its easy applicability and its almost perfect inter-rater reliability, even with non-specialists, the mTICCS might therefore be a useful tool to predict the early need for MT in multiple trauma. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-10-14 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8825405/ /pubmed/33051727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01523-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Horst, Klemens Lichte, Philipp Bläsius, Felix Weber, Christian David Tonglet, Martin Kobbe, Philipp Heussen, Nicole Hildebrand, Frank mTICCS and its inter-rater reliability to predict the need for massive transfusion in severely injured patients |
title | mTICCS and its inter-rater reliability to predict the need for massive transfusion in severely injured patients |
title_full | mTICCS and its inter-rater reliability to predict the need for massive transfusion in severely injured patients |
title_fullStr | mTICCS and its inter-rater reliability to predict the need for massive transfusion in severely injured patients |
title_full_unstemmed | mTICCS and its inter-rater reliability to predict the need for massive transfusion in severely injured patients |
title_short | mTICCS and its inter-rater reliability to predict the need for massive transfusion in severely injured patients |
title_sort | mticcs and its inter-rater reliability to predict the need for massive transfusion in severely injured patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825405/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-020-01523-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT horstklemens mticcsanditsinterraterreliabilitytopredicttheneedformassivetransfusioninseverelyinjuredpatients AT lichtephilipp mticcsanditsinterraterreliabilitytopredicttheneedformassivetransfusioninseverelyinjuredpatients AT blasiusfelix mticcsanditsinterraterreliabilitytopredicttheneedformassivetransfusioninseverelyinjuredpatients AT weberchristiandavid mticcsanditsinterraterreliabilitytopredicttheneedformassivetransfusioninseverelyinjuredpatients AT tongletmartin mticcsanditsinterraterreliabilitytopredicttheneedformassivetransfusioninseverelyinjuredpatients AT kobbephilipp mticcsanditsinterraterreliabilitytopredicttheneedformassivetransfusioninseverelyinjuredpatients AT heussennicole mticcsanditsinterraterreliabilitytopredicttheneedformassivetransfusioninseverelyinjuredpatients AT hildebrandfrank mticcsanditsinterraterreliabilitytopredicttheneedformassivetransfusioninseverelyinjuredpatients |