Cargando…

Transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic valve using the J-valve system with locator device: early and mid-term outcomes

BACKGROUND: Prior to the approval of the Sapien valve in 2020, there were no commercially available short-frame valves for transapical mitral valve-in-valve (MVIV) implantation. In January 2019, we first attempted the reverse mounted J-valve for transapical MVIV implantation with good clinical resul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Kun, Shen, Jinglun, Wu, Kaisheng, Meng, Fei, Wang, Shengxun, Zheng, Shuai, Zhang, Haibo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242866
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6513
_version_ 1784647236390486016
author Liu, Kun
Shen, Jinglun
Wu, Kaisheng
Meng, Fei
Wang, Shengxun
Zheng, Shuai
Zhang, Haibo
author_facet Liu, Kun
Shen, Jinglun
Wu, Kaisheng
Meng, Fei
Wang, Shengxun
Zheng, Shuai
Zhang, Haibo
author_sort Liu, Kun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prior to the approval of the Sapien valve in 2020, there were no commercially available short-frame valves for transapical mitral valve-in-valve (MVIV) implantation. In January 2019, we first attempted the reverse mounted J-valve for transapical MVIV implantation with good clinical results. The present study aimed to explore the safety and effectiveness of transapical MVIV implantation with the J-valve reversely mounted on the delivery system. METHODS: Patients who underwent transapical MVIV implantation using the J-valve were analyzed from January 2019 to December 2020 with a 1-year follow-up. Before the procedure, computed tomography (CT) angiography data were analyzed to determine the inner diameter, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), and coaxial angel. An oversize rate of 5–10% was used to select the J-valve depending on the scanned inner diameter of the original mitral bioprosthesis. During the procedure, the three U-shape graspers were one-to-one buckled with the three tissue valve struts with the assist of echo and fluoroscopy. The implant depth into the left atrium was a 0–20% part of the J-valve, and the valve was then released under rapid pacing. Post-balloon dilatation was used when needed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (mean age 70.05±11.19 years), with a mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 8.01%±4.20%, were included. By transesophageal echocardiography, we found that the mean transvalvular gradient was 6.21±2.63 mmHg. The mean follow-up time was 20.31±7.23 months, and the survival rate was 94.74% at the last follow-up. The transvalvular gradient decreased from 15.06±3.00 mmHg at basal to 7.13±2.28 mmHg at the 1-year follow-up (P<0.001). The left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) increased from 60.31%±7.30% to 59.94%±7.72% at the 1-year follow-up (P=0.863). Thirteen (81.25%) patients had no or trace paravalvular leak (PVL), two (12.50%) patients had minor PVL, one (6.25%) patient had moderate PVL, and there were no cases of major regurgitation at the 1-year transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) examination results. CONCLUSIONS: The J-valve reversely mounted on the delivery system can be used for transapical MVIV implantation with less operative morbidity and favourable outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8825539
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88255392022-03-02 Transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic valve using the J-valve system with locator device: early and mid-term outcomes Liu, Kun Shen, Jinglun Wu, Kaisheng Meng, Fei Wang, Shengxun Zheng, Shuai Zhang, Haibo Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Prior to the approval of the Sapien valve in 2020, there were no commercially available short-frame valves for transapical mitral valve-in-valve (MVIV) implantation. In January 2019, we first attempted the reverse mounted J-valve for transapical MVIV implantation with good clinical results. The present study aimed to explore the safety and effectiveness of transapical MVIV implantation with the J-valve reversely mounted on the delivery system. METHODS: Patients who underwent transapical MVIV implantation using the J-valve were analyzed from January 2019 to December 2020 with a 1-year follow-up. Before the procedure, computed tomography (CT) angiography data were analyzed to determine the inner diameter, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT), and coaxial angel. An oversize rate of 5–10% was used to select the J-valve depending on the scanned inner diameter of the original mitral bioprosthesis. During the procedure, the three U-shape graspers were one-to-one buckled with the three tissue valve struts with the assist of echo and fluoroscopy. The implant depth into the left atrium was a 0–20% part of the J-valve, and the valve was then released under rapid pacing. Post-balloon dilatation was used when needed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients (mean age 70.05±11.19 years), with a mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons score of 8.01%±4.20%, were included. By transesophageal echocardiography, we found that the mean transvalvular gradient was 6.21±2.63 mmHg. The mean follow-up time was 20.31±7.23 months, and the survival rate was 94.74% at the last follow-up. The transvalvular gradient decreased from 15.06±3.00 mmHg at basal to 7.13±2.28 mmHg at the 1-year follow-up (P<0.001). The left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) increased from 60.31%±7.30% to 59.94%±7.72% at the 1-year follow-up (P=0.863). Thirteen (81.25%) patients had no or trace paravalvular leak (PVL), two (12.50%) patients had minor PVL, one (6.25%) patient had moderate PVL, and there were no cases of major regurgitation at the 1-year transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) examination results. CONCLUSIONS: The J-valve reversely mounted on the delivery system can be used for transapical MVIV implantation with less operative morbidity and favourable outcomes. AME Publishing Company 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8825539/ /pubmed/35242866 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6513 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Liu, Kun
Shen, Jinglun
Wu, Kaisheng
Meng, Fei
Wang, Shengxun
Zheng, Shuai
Zhang, Haibo
Transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic valve using the J-valve system with locator device: early and mid-term outcomes
title Transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic valve using the J-valve system with locator device: early and mid-term outcomes
title_full Transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic valve using the J-valve system with locator device: early and mid-term outcomes
title_fullStr Transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic valve using the J-valve system with locator device: early and mid-term outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic valve using the J-valve system with locator device: early and mid-term outcomes
title_short Transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic valve using the J-valve system with locator device: early and mid-term outcomes
title_sort transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantation for failed bioprosthetic valve using the j-valve system with locator device: early and mid-term outcomes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825539/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242866
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6513
work_keys_str_mv AT liukun transapicalmitralvalveinvalveimplantationforfailedbioprostheticvalveusingthejvalvesystemwithlocatordeviceearlyandmidtermoutcomes
AT shenjinglun transapicalmitralvalveinvalveimplantationforfailedbioprostheticvalveusingthejvalvesystemwithlocatordeviceearlyandmidtermoutcomes
AT wukaisheng transapicalmitralvalveinvalveimplantationforfailedbioprostheticvalveusingthejvalvesystemwithlocatordeviceearlyandmidtermoutcomes
AT mengfei transapicalmitralvalveinvalveimplantationforfailedbioprostheticvalveusingthejvalvesystemwithlocatordeviceearlyandmidtermoutcomes
AT wangshengxun transapicalmitralvalveinvalveimplantationforfailedbioprostheticvalveusingthejvalvesystemwithlocatordeviceearlyandmidtermoutcomes
AT zhengshuai transapicalmitralvalveinvalveimplantationforfailedbioprostheticvalveusingthejvalvesystemwithlocatordeviceearlyandmidtermoutcomes
AT zhanghaibo transapicalmitralvalveinvalveimplantationforfailedbioprostheticvalveusingthejvalvesystemwithlocatordeviceearlyandmidtermoutcomes