Cargando…

Learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy

BACKGROUND: Anatomical segmentectomy by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) is a delicate surgical procedure. Hitherto, only few studies have assessed the learning curves of anatomical segmentectomy by U-VATS, with varying data available. The present study aimed to investigate th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Lei, Shen, Yumei, Duan, Shanzhou, Jin, Xing, Wang, Yifei, Sang, Yonghua, Chen, Yongbing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242857
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6113
_version_ 1784647239067500544
author Chen, Lei
Shen, Yumei
Duan, Shanzhou
Jin, Xing
Wang, Yifei
Sang, Yonghua
Chen, Yongbing
author_facet Chen, Lei
Shen, Yumei
Duan, Shanzhou
Jin, Xing
Wang, Yifei
Sang, Yonghua
Chen, Yongbing
author_sort Chen, Lei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anatomical segmentectomy by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) is a delicate surgical procedure. Hitherto, only few studies have assessed the learning curves of anatomical segmentectomy by U-VATS, with varying data available. The present study aimed to investigate the learning curve and clinical advantages for U-VATS segmentectomy. METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent U-VATS or non-U-VATS segmentectomy between August 2017 and May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was employed to illustrate the learning curve of U-VATS segmentectomy. Perioperative parameters were used to determine the structural intervals of the learning curve, and to compare U-VATS and non-U-VATS segmentectomy. RESULTS: In total, 122 patients receiving U-VATS segmentectomy and 98 patients receiving non-VATS segmentectomy were included. Of these, 116 patients underwent successful U-VATS segmentectomy, while the other six patients underwent conversions. The structural intervals of 20–29 cases and 58–63 cases were determined as the threshold according to the CUSUM analyses. The learning process of U-VATS segmentectomy was therefore divided into three phases. Interestingly, the perioperative parameters differed significantly between Phases 1 and 3, including operative time (Op-T), postoperative hospital stays (Po-Hst), postoperative thoracic drainage (Po-D), and operative failure (Po-F) rates (P<0.05). Moreover, U-VATS segmentectomy in Phase 3 was associated with significantly shorter Po-Hst and Op-T, less Po-D, and reduced postoperative pain compared with non-U-VATS (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: U-VATS segmentectomy is an ideal alternative to non-U-VATS segmentectomy. Surgeons can preliminarily complete U-VATS anatomical segmentectomy after performing 20–29 cases, and can master the surgical techniques after completing 58–63 cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8825550
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-88255502022-03-02 Learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy Chen, Lei Shen, Yumei Duan, Shanzhou Jin, Xing Wang, Yifei Sang, Yonghua Chen, Yongbing Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Anatomical segmentectomy by uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (U-VATS) is a delicate surgical procedure. Hitherto, only few studies have assessed the learning curves of anatomical segmentectomy by U-VATS, with varying data available. The present study aimed to investigate the learning curve and clinical advantages for U-VATS segmentectomy. METHODS: The medical records of patients who underwent U-VATS or non-U-VATS segmentectomy between August 2017 and May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis was employed to illustrate the learning curve of U-VATS segmentectomy. Perioperative parameters were used to determine the structural intervals of the learning curve, and to compare U-VATS and non-U-VATS segmentectomy. RESULTS: In total, 122 patients receiving U-VATS segmentectomy and 98 patients receiving non-VATS segmentectomy were included. Of these, 116 patients underwent successful U-VATS segmentectomy, while the other six patients underwent conversions. The structural intervals of 20–29 cases and 58–63 cases were determined as the threshold according to the CUSUM analyses. The learning process of U-VATS segmentectomy was therefore divided into three phases. Interestingly, the perioperative parameters differed significantly between Phases 1 and 3, including operative time (Op-T), postoperative hospital stays (Po-Hst), postoperative thoracic drainage (Po-D), and operative failure (Po-F) rates (P<0.05). Moreover, U-VATS segmentectomy in Phase 3 was associated with significantly shorter Po-Hst and Op-T, less Po-D, and reduced postoperative pain compared with non-U-VATS (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: U-VATS segmentectomy is an ideal alternative to non-U-VATS segmentectomy. Surgeons can preliminarily complete U-VATS anatomical segmentectomy after performing 20–29 cases, and can master the surgical techniques after completing 58–63 cases. AME Publishing Company 2022-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8825550/ /pubmed/35242857 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6113 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Chen, Lei
Shen, Yumei
Duan, Shanzhou
Jin, Xing
Wang, Yifei
Sang, Yonghua
Chen, Yongbing
Learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy
title Learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy
title_full Learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy
title_fullStr Learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy
title_full_unstemmed Learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy
title_short Learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy
title_sort learning curve for uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical segmentectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825550/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35242857
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-6113
work_keys_str_mv AT chenlei learningcurveforuniportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicanatomicalsegmentectomy
AT shenyumei learningcurveforuniportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicanatomicalsegmentectomy
AT duanshanzhou learningcurveforuniportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicanatomicalsegmentectomy
AT jinxing learningcurveforuniportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicanatomicalsegmentectomy
AT wangyifei learningcurveforuniportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicanatomicalsegmentectomy
AT sangyonghua learningcurveforuniportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicanatomicalsegmentectomy
AT chenyongbing learningcurveforuniportalvideoassistedthoracoscopicanatomicalsegmentectomy