Cargando…
The effect of biofeedback on smoking cessation—a systematic short review
PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to focus on the effect of biofeedback on smoking cessation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed original articles including biofeedback and/or neurofeedback training as an intervention for smoki...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34870741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-021-01977-x |
_version_ | 1784647257307480064 |
---|---|
author | Keilani, Mohammad Steiner, Margarete Crevenna, Richard |
author_facet | Keilani, Mohammad Steiner, Margarete Crevenna, Richard |
author_sort | Keilani, Mohammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to focus on the effect of biofeedback on smoking cessation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed original articles including biofeedback and/or neurofeedback training as an intervention for smoking cessation were included. The PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were screened for trials published up to July 2021. The effects on smoking rates and smoking behavior, and biofeedback/neurofeedback training measures are summarized here. RESULTS: In total, three articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The total Downs and Black checklist scores ranged from 11 to 23 points, showing that the articles were of poor to good methodological quality. The included studies were heterogeneous, both in terms of treatment protocols and in terms of outcome parameters. Pooling of data for a meta-analysis was not possible. Therefore, we were limited to describing the included studies. The included biofeedback study demonstrated that skin temperature training might improve the patients’ ability to raise their skin temperature aiming at stress alleviation. All three studies reported positive effects of biofeedback/neurofeedback in supporting smokers to quit. Furthermore, individualized electroencephalography neurofeedback training showed promising results in one study in modulating craving-related responses. CONCLUSION: The results of the present review suggest that biofeedback/neurofeedback training might facilitate smoking cessation by changing behavioral outcomes. Although the investigated studies contained heterogeneous methodologies, they showed interesting approaches that could be further investigated and elaborated. To improve the scientific evidence, prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate biofeedback/neurofeedback in clinical settings for smoking cessation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8825623 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-88256232022-02-23 The effect of biofeedback on smoking cessation—a systematic short review Keilani, Mohammad Steiner, Margarete Crevenna, Richard Wien Klin Wochenschr Main Topic PURPOSE: The aim of this systematic review was to focus on the effect of biofeedback on smoking cessation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Peer-reviewed original articles including biofeedback and/or neurofeedback training as an intervention for smoking cessation were included. The PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were screened for trials published up to July 2021. The effects on smoking rates and smoking behavior, and biofeedback/neurofeedback training measures are summarized here. RESULTS: In total, three articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The total Downs and Black checklist scores ranged from 11 to 23 points, showing that the articles were of poor to good methodological quality. The included studies were heterogeneous, both in terms of treatment protocols and in terms of outcome parameters. Pooling of data for a meta-analysis was not possible. Therefore, we were limited to describing the included studies. The included biofeedback study demonstrated that skin temperature training might improve the patients’ ability to raise their skin temperature aiming at stress alleviation. All three studies reported positive effects of biofeedback/neurofeedback in supporting smokers to quit. Furthermore, individualized electroencephalography neurofeedback training showed promising results in one study in modulating craving-related responses. CONCLUSION: The results of the present review suggest that biofeedback/neurofeedback training might facilitate smoking cessation by changing behavioral outcomes. Although the investigated studies contained heterogeneous methodologies, they showed interesting approaches that could be further investigated and elaborated. To improve the scientific evidence, prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate biofeedback/neurofeedback in clinical settings for smoking cessation. Springer Vienna 2021-12-06 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8825623/ /pubmed/34870741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-021-01977-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Main Topic Keilani, Mohammad Steiner, Margarete Crevenna, Richard The effect of biofeedback on smoking cessation—a systematic short review |
title | The effect of biofeedback on smoking cessation—a systematic short review |
title_full | The effect of biofeedback on smoking cessation—a systematic short review |
title_fullStr | The effect of biofeedback on smoking cessation—a systematic short review |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of biofeedback on smoking cessation—a systematic short review |
title_short | The effect of biofeedback on smoking cessation—a systematic short review |
title_sort | effect of biofeedback on smoking cessation—a systematic short review |
topic | Main Topic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8825623/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34870741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-021-01977-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keilanimohammad theeffectofbiofeedbackonsmokingcessationasystematicshortreview AT steinermargarete theeffectofbiofeedbackonsmokingcessationasystematicshortreview AT crevennarichard theeffectofbiofeedbackonsmokingcessationasystematicshortreview AT keilanimohammad effectofbiofeedbackonsmokingcessationasystematicshortreview AT steinermargarete effectofbiofeedbackonsmokingcessationasystematicshortreview AT crevennarichard effectofbiofeedbackonsmokingcessationasystematicshortreview |